Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution?

Year 2020, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 109 - 125, 30.12.2020

Norzaini Azman

Abstract

This article analyses the academics’ role in the (shared) governance of the Malaysian higher education system over a period of five years (2007 – 2013). The aim is to provide a perspective of how Malaysian academics perceive the governance and management practices based on data from two similar studies of the Changing Academic Profession (CAP) in 2007 and 2013. Findings reveal that the academics clearly consolidated their hold over personnel decisions. However, the mid-level management maintained the control of decisions in areas related to the regulation of academic work. Furthermore, the respondents in the 2007 and 2013 studies acknowledged having little influence in determining institutional policies at the school/faculty and institutional levels. In the areas of selection of administrators and approval of new programmes, top management and boards retained their primary influence. While the quality of communication seemed to have improved since 2007, the academics’ perceptions of a stronger performance orientation, top-down management style and bureaucracy over the five years reflected the continued strength of the market coordinated system in the Malaysian higher education system. Middle management appeared to have made inroads in the management and governance of HEIs. The paper concludes by proposing a number of initiatives for ensuring that shared governance is effectively implemented in higher education institutions.

Keywords

shared governance, decision-making, Malaysia, management

References

• Altbach, P. G. (2010). The Realities of Mass Higher Education in a Globalized World. In B. Johnstone, M. Ambrosio, and P. Yakoboski (Eds). Higher Education in a Global Society (pp.25–41). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
• Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2016). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories, and practices. New York, US: Routledge.
• Author (2019). Teaching and learning: The Malaysian academic profession in transition. In C. D. Wan, M. Sirat & D. Abdul Razak (Eds.), Higher education in Malaysia: A critical review of the past and present for the future (pp. 75-94). Penang, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
• Author and Colleague. (2016). Imposing global university rankings on local academic culture: Insights from the National University of Malaysia. In M. Yudkevich, P. G. Altbach & L. E. Rumbley (Eds.), The global academic rankings game: Changing institutional policy, practice, and academic life (pp. 97-123). London, UK: Routledge.
• Author et al. (2016). Academic promotion in Malaysian public universities: A critical look at issues and challenges. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), 71-88.
• Author et al. . (2011). Malaysia: Perspectives of university governance and management within the academic profession. In W. Locke, K. Cummings & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy (pp. 83-106). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
• Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 127, 5-22.
• Bok, D. (2013). The trouble with the shared governance. Trusteeship, 2/(5). Retrieved from: http://agb.org/trusteeship/2013/9/trouble-shared-govemance
• Bowen, W. G., & Tobin, E. M. (2014). Locus of authority: The evolution of faculty roles in the governance of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Briggs, A.R.J. (2001) Academic middle managers in further education: reflections on leadership. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 6(2), 223-236.
• Bucklew, N., Houghton, J. D., & Ellison, C. N. (2012). Faculty union and faculty senate co-existence: A review of the impact of academic collective bargaining on traditional academic governance. Labor Studies Journal, 37(4), 373-390.
• Carroll, K., Dickson, L., & Ruseski, J. (2012). Do faculty matter? Effects of faculty participation in university decisions [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://economics.umbc.edu/files/2014/09/wp_13_06.pdf
• Crellin, M. A. (2010). The future of shared governance. New Directions for Higher Education, 151, 71-81.
• Dearlove, J. (2002). A continuing role for academics: The governance of UK Universities in the post-dearing era. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 257-275.
• Finkelstein, M., Ju, M., & Cummings, W. K. (2011). The United States of America: Perspectives on faculty governance 1992-2007. In W. Locke, K. Cummings & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy (pp. 199-222). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
• Fitzgerald, T. (2009). The Tyranny of Bureaucracy: Continuing Challenges of Leading and Managing from the Middle. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 37 (1): 51–65.
• Floyd, A. (2016). Supporting Academic Middle Managers in Higher Education: Do We Care? Higher Education Policy, 2016, 29, 167–183.
• Flynn, J. (2005). The moral foundations of faculty governance in colleges and universities. Unpublished manuscript. Caldwell College.
• Gerber, L. G. (2014). The rise and decline of faculty governance: Professionalization and the modern American university. Baltimore, US: John Hopkins University Press.
• Greene, J. P., Kisida, B., & Mills, J. (2010). Administrative bloat at American universities: The real reason for high costs in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: Goldwater Institute.
• Hambali, S. N., Faruqi, S. S., & Abdul Manan, N. (2009). The development of education law relating to the public universities in Malaysia: Towards liberalisation of the university governance and commercialisation of the academic activities. Paper presented at the 10th General Assembly of ASEAN Law Association. Hanoi, Vietnam.
• Harman, K., & Treadgold, E. (2007). Changing patterns of governance for Australian universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 13-29.
• Harun, M. F., & Komoo, I. (2020). Kecemerlangan penyelidikan [Research excellence]. In N. Author & I. Komoo (Eds.), Membina ekosistem akademik berasaskan akademik berbudaya cemerlang [Ecosystem for academic culture of excellence]. Bangi, Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. (In Print).
• Heaney, T. (2010). Democracy, shared governance, and the university. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 128, 69-79.
• Johnson, A. L., DuVivier, R. S., & Hambright, W. G. (2017). Shared university governance: Faculty perceptions on involvement and leadership. Leadership and Research in Education, 4(1), 10-26.
• Jones, W. A. (2012). Faculty involvement in institutional governance: A literature review. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 117-135.
• Kwiek, M. (2015). The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 4377-89.
• Kaplan, G. E. (2006). Institutions of academic governance and institutional theory: A framework for further research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 213-281). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
• Kater, S. T. (2017). Community college faculty conceptualizations of shared governance: Shared understandings of a socio-political reality. Community College Review, 45(3), 234-257.
• Kaur, S., & Manan, S. A. (2010). Market forces and globalization: Implications for higher education in Malaysia. In M. Sirat & S. Kaur (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the global higher education marketplace: Prospects and challenges (pp. 55-69). Penang, Malaysia: National Higher Education Research Institute, University Sains Malaysia.
• Kekäle, J. (2003). Academic leaders as thermostats. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(4), 281-298.
• Leach, W. (2008). Shared governance in higher education: Structural and cultural responses to a changing national climate. Sacramento, California: Center for Collaborative Policy, California State University.
• Lee, M. N. N. (2002). Educational change in Malaysia (Monograph series no. 3). Penang, Malaysia: School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
• Lee, M. N. N. (2004). Global trends, national policies and institutional responses: Restructuring higher education in Malaysia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(1), 31-46.
• Maassen, P. (2017). The university's governance paradox. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 290-298. McGrane, W. L. (2013). Shared governance and regional accreditation: Institutional processes and perceptions. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Capella University.
• Merritt, K. (2016). The new flagship university: Changing the paradigm from global ranking to national relevancy. Planning for Higher Education, 44(3), 105.
• Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (MOHE). (2015a). Higher education statistics 2015. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.
• Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (MOHE). (2015b). University transformation programme green book: Enhancing university board governance and effectiveness. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.
• Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (MOHE). (2018). Higher education statistics 2018. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.
• Mohd Yusoff, Y., Syed Hassan, S. N., Che Omar, I., & Ahmad, Y. (2020). Pengurusan akademik cemerlang [Management of academic excellence]. In N. Author & I. Komoo (Eds.), Membina ekosistem akademik berasaskan akademik berbudaya cemerlang [Ecosystem for academic culture of excellence]. Bangi, Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. (In Print).
• Mok, K. H. (2007). The search for new governance: Corporatisation and privatisation of public universities in Malaysia and Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27(3), 271-290.
• Mok, K. H. (2008). Varieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberalization of the higher education market and changing governance in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. The Pacific Review, 21(2), 147-170.
• Moran, P. (2012). Higher education governance: Penn State and the land grant tradition. Penn State, Altoona: The Pennsylvania State University.
• Nadler, D. P., Miller, M. T., & Modica, J. (2010). Organizational performance through staff governance: Improving shared governance in the higher education environment. Journal of Organizational Learning & Leadership, 8(1), 76-85.
• Nelson, A. (2010). New study documents growing role for higher education in driving economic development efforts in states. Retrieved from http://www.rockinst.org/newsroom/news_releases/2010/03-15-new_paradigm_for_ economic_development.aspx
• Pierce, S. R. (2014). Governance reconsidered: How boards, presidents, administrators, and faculty can help their colleges thrive. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons.
• Ramo, K. (1997). Reforming shared governance: Do the arguments hold up? Academe, 83(5), 38-43. Santiago, R., Carvalho, T. & Cardoso, S. (2015). Portuguese academics' perceptions of higher education institutions' governance and management: a generational perspective. Studies in Higher Education (8), 1471-1484.
• Schwartz, M., Skinner, R., & Bowen, Z. (2009). Faculty, governing boards, and institutional governance. New York, NY: TIAA-CREF Institute.
• Shattock, M. (2014). University governance in the UK: Bending the traditional model. In M. Shattock (Ed.), International trends in university governance: Autonomy, self-governance and the distribution of authority (pp. 127-144). London, UK: Routledge.
• Shattock, M. (2013) University Governance, Leadership and Management in a Decade of Diversification and Uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), pp. 217–233.
• Sheets, R., Crawford, S., & Soares, L. (2012). Rethinking higher education business models [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2012/03/pdf/higher_ed_business_models.pdf.
• Sirat, M. (2010). Strategic planning directions of Malaysia’s higher education: University autonomy in the midst of political uncertainties. Higher Education, 59(4), 461-473.
• Stensaker, B., & Vabø, A. (2013). Re‐inventing shared governance: Implications for organisational culture and institutional leadership. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 256-274.
• Taib, F. M., & Abdullah, M. N. L. Y. (Eds.). (2016). Governance reforms in public universities of Malaysia. Penang, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
• Taylor, M. (2013). Shared governance in the modern university. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(1), 80-94.
• Teichler, U., Arimoto, A., & Cummings, W. K. (2013). The changing academic profession. Routledge, United Kingdom: Springer.
• Tierney, W. G. (2008). The impact of culture on organizational decision making. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
• Tierney, W. G. & Minor, J. T., (2004). A cultural perspective on communication and governance. New Directions in Higher Education, 127, 85-94.
• Tierney, W., & Minor, J. (2003). Challenges for governance: A national report. Los Angeles: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.
• Tinberg, N. (2009). A call for faculty reengagement in governance. Academe, 95(6), 8-10.
• Trakman, L. (2008). Modelling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1‐2), 63-83.
• University and University Colleges Act Amendment Act (UUCA). (1971). Act 30. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.
• University and University Colleges Act Amendment Act (UUCA). (2009). Act of parliament. clause 5 article 66. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.
• Wan Abdul Manan, W. M. (2008). The Malaysian National Higher Educational Plan: Redefining autonomy and academic freedom under the APEX experiment. Paper presented at the Association of Southeast Asian Institutions of Higher Learning Conference on University Autonomy. University Sains Malaysia, Penang