Striving for Equality: The Forces Shaping Equal Opportunities in the Recruitment of Female Faculty Members in Iran

Year 2025, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 37 - 51, 30.06.2025

Zahra Kamyabifar , Mohsen Nazarzadeh Zare , Abbas Khakpour

https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1651430

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the factors that influence equal opportunities in the recruitment of female faculty members in Iran. To achieve this aim, we adopted a qualitative approach employing the case study method. The participants in the study were individuals with an experienced background in the faculty members' recruitment committee who were selected with purposeful sampling methods of criterion type. To collect the data, we used a semi-structured interview and performed a thematic analysis for data analysis. The findings showed that the views of the participants in the study about the factors that influence equal opportunities in the recruitment of female faculty members in Iran can be classified into three inclusive themes, including trans-organizational factors, organizational factors, and individual factors. The study had three implications. First, feminist theory, change theory, equal opportunity theory, and role congruity theory justify equal opportunities in the recruitment of female faculty members. Second, despite Iran's constitutional support for creating equal opportunities for the recruitment of women, the prevalence of a patriarchal culture in the Iranian academic system has intensified gender inequalities. Third, creating equal opportunities for the recruitment of female faculty members in Iran not only requires changes in institutional-level laws but also demands a shift in the culture and practices governing universities.

Keywords

Equal Opportunities , Iran’s Higher Education , Female Academic Staff; , Female Recruitment

References

• Ahmadi, V. (2013). Changes in attitude towards gender inequality in the process of demographic transition. Journal of Applied Sociology, 24(3), 15-34. (In Persian)
• Alaedini, P., & Razavi, M. R. (2005). Women’s participation and employment in Iran: A critical examination. Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies, 14(1), 57-73. DOI: 10.1080/10669920500057062 (In Persian)
• Alonso, P., Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2017). Structured behavioral interview as a legal guarantee for ensuring equal employment opportunities for women: A meta-analysis. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(1), 15-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.03.002 Arêas, R., Abreu, A. R. D. P., Santana, A. E., Barbosa, M. C., & Nobre, C. (2020). Gender and the scissors graph of Brazilian science: From equality to invisibility. Open Science Framework. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/m6eb4
• Armstrong, C. (2002). Complex equality: Beyond equality and difference. Feminist Theory, 3(1), 67-82. DOI: 10.1177/1460012002003001066 Azam Azadeh, M., & Moshtaghian, M. (2016). Obstacles of female participation in social development. Social Problems of Iran, 7(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jspi.7.1.31. DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.jspi.7.1.31 (In Persian)
• Azizi, F., & Moradi, F. (2022). An analysis of barriers to woman’s economic participation in Iran. The International Journal of Humanities, 29(3), 79-107. DOI: 10.1001.1.25382640.2022.29.3.6.0 Bailey, A. H., LaFrance, M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2019). Is man the measure of all things? A social cognitive account of androcentrism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 307-331. DOI: 10.1177/1088868318782848
• Bird, S. R., & Rhoton, L. A. (2021). Seeing isn’t always believing: Gender, academic STEM, and women scientists’ perceptions of career opportunities. Gender & Society, 35(3), 422-448. DOI: 10.1177/08912432211008814 Bryant, L. D., Burkinshaw, P., House, A. O., West, R. M., & Ward, V. (2017). Good practice or positive action? Using Q methodology to identify competing views on improving gender equality in academic medicine. BMJ Open, 7(8), e015973. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015973
• Burkinshaw, P., & White, K. (2017). Fixing the women or fixing universities: Women in HE leadership. Administrative Sciences, 7(3), 30. DOI: 10.3390/admsci7030030 Bush, T., & Middlewood, D. (2013). Leading and managing people in education. Sage. p. 145.
• Campos-Serna, J., Ronda-Pérez, E., Artazcoz, L., Moen, B. E., & Benavides, F. G. (2013). Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: A systematic review. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-57 Cardel, M. I., Dhurandhar, E., Yarar-Fisher, C., Foster, M., Hidalgo, B., McClure, L. A., ... & Angelini, C. (2020). Turning chutes into ladders for women faculty: A review and roadmap for equity in academia. Journal of Women's Health, 29(5), 721-733. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8027
• Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (2019). Postmodern management theory. Routledge. p. 16. DOI: 10.4324/9780429431678 Carlsson, M., Finseraas, H., Midtbøen, A. H., & Rafnsdóttir, G. L. (2021). Gender bias in academic recruitment? Evidence from a survey experiment in the Nordic region. European Sociological Review, 37(3), 399-410. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcaa052
• Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Manwell, L. B., Byars-Winston, A., Fine, E., Ford, C. E., ... & Sheridan, J. (2015). Effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 90(2), 221. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552 Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13-23. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24631
• Casad, B. J., Garasky, C. E., Jancetic, T. R., Brown, A. K., Franks, J. E., & Bach, C. R. (2022). US women faculty in the social sciences also face gender inequalities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 792756. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792756 Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75-141. DOI: 10.1177/1529100614541236
• Dabbaghi, H. (2020). A multiple narrative of the work-life relationships of academic women. Iranian Journal of Anthropology, 17(31), 15-30. DOI: 10.1001.1.17352096.1399.17.31.6.8. (In Persian) Del Carmen Triana, M., Song, R., Um, C. T., & Huang, L. (2023). Stereotypical perception in management: A review and expansion of role congruity theory. Journal of Management, 50(1), 1-20. DOI: 10.1177/01492063231180836
• Ferreira, F. H., & Peragine, V. (2013). Equality of opportunity: Theory and evidence (IZA Discussion Paper No. 8994),p. 3. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2598934. Ghasemi, M. (2022). The perception of female faculty members about attending the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Training Institute in Bushehr Center. New Paradigms in Educational Research, 1(1), 21-36. (In Persian)
• Ghoraishi Khorasgani, M. S., & Nazarzadeh Zare, M. (2021). A look at the challenges of boundary-spanner academic leaders. Journal of Iranian Higher Education, 13(2), 72-95. DOI: 20.1001.1.20088000.1400.13.2.5.1 (In Persian) Golubchik, L., & Redel, M. (2018). Diversity in faculty recruiting: A WiSE approach. In Abstracts of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (pp. 140-142). DOI: 10.1145/3292040.3219676
• International Labour Organization. (2022). Theory of Change towards a transformative agenda for gender equality in the world of work. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/WCMS_859781/lang--en/index.htm Janalizadeh Choub Basti, H., Moghimi, A., & Amini, M. (2009). A sociological explanation of the professional status of academic women. Women in Development and Politics (Women's Studies), 6(2), 47-77. (In Persian)
• Keshavarz, K. (2015). The gap between women's access to higher education and their presence in the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Socio - Cultural Development Studies, 4(1), 177-202. (In Persian) Keshavarz, K. (2020). Difficulties for women to enter the academic career: Qualitative study. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 13(1), 39-71. DOI: 10.22035/jicr.2020.2299.2784
• Klysing, A., Renström, E. A., Gustafsson‐Sendén, M., & Lindqvist, A. (2022). Gender diversity in recruitment: Influence of gender trouble on applicant attraction and evaluation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(8), 781-802. DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12964 Konrad, A. M., & Linnehan, F. (1995). Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 787–820. DOI: 10.2307/256741
• Kostić, N. D., Čolak, A., & Vrbaški, S. (2022). Gender-based discrimination and labour in Serbia. Women's Rights Center. p.20. Kray, L. J., Howland, L., Russell, A. G., & Jackman, L. M. (2017). The effects of implicit gender role theories on gender system justification: Fixed beliefs strengthen masculinity to preserve the status quo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 98. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000086
• Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., & Dronkers, N. F. (2021). Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron, 109(13), 2047-2074. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.04.023 Looze, J. (2017). Why do (n't) they leave?: Motherhood and women's job mobility. Social Science Research, 65, 47-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.03.001
• Mithaug, D. E. (1996). Equal opportunity theory. Sage. Nazari, L. (2021). Women's leadership: An approach to breaking the glass ceiling. Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society, 12(47), 33-44. DOI: 10.30495/jzvj.2021.24468.3185 (In Persian)
• Nouri, A., & Mohammadi, Y. (2015). A practical guide to research in the humanities. Virayesh.p.206. (In Persian) Ramezani, M. (2021). A three-fold increase in female faculty members in two decades. Farhikhtegan Newspaper. Retrieved from https://farhikhtegandaily.com/news (In Persian)
• Rezaeinasab, Z. (2022). Study of the fields and contexts of the formation of unemployment of female graduates of Ilam universities. Woman in Development & Politics, 20(2), 315-341. DOI: 10.22059/jwdp.2022.337198.1008143 (In Persian) Saadat, E. (2018). Human resources management. SAMT. p. 120 (In Persian)
• Safiri, Kh., & Baghestani, A. (2014). A review of sensing gender discrimination among faculty members and factors causing it. Journal of Iranian Higher Education, 6(3), 31-62. (In Persian) Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40, 173-213. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12542
• Shahbazi, S., Tajvar, M., Khaledian, Z., Yekaninejad, M. S., & Dargahi, H. (2021). The relationship between gender inequality and happiness in Iran's provinces: An ecological study. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, 18(4), 403-416. (In Persian) Shaditalab, J., & Ebrahimpour, S. (2017). Narrative of women's experiences in promotion to professorship at universities of Iran. Refahj, 17(66), 53-106. (In Persian)
• Shirbagi, N., Salimi, J., & Barkhoda, S. J. (2018). Investigating the attitudes of teacher students in towards the perception of job equality. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 9(34), 51-76. (In Persian) Stoilkovska, A., Ilieva, J., & Gjakovski, S. (2015). Equal employment opportunities in the recruitment and selection process of human resources. UTMS Journal of Economics, 6(2), 281-320.
• Taj Mazinani, A. A., & Yaseri, Z. (2013). Investigating women's employment policy-making in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Women's Strategic Studies, 15(59), 7-58. (In Persian) Taylor, L. S. (2022). The myth of meritocracy in the pharmaceutical sciences. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 19(3), 729-730. DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c01002 Thirusanku, J. (2021). Equal opportunity within the workplace. Economics and Business Quarterly Reviews, 4(3), 1-14. Yousaf, R., & Schmiede, R. (2017). Barriers to women’s representation in academic excellence and positions of power. Asian Journal of German and European Studies, 2, 1-13. DOI: 10.1186/s40856-017-0015-6