The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye

Ufuk Burak Karcıoğlu

TR EN

Değerin Dijital Yeniden Doğuşu: Uluslararası Modeller, Yapay Zekâ Merkezli Dönüşüm ve Türkiye İçin Stratejik Atılım

Abstract

Amaç: Bu makalenin amacı, değer odaklı sağlık bakımının (Value-Based Care – VBC) dijital dönüşüm sürecinde nasıl yeniden şekillendiğini incelemek ve yapay zekânın (AI) risk stratifikasyonu, klinik karar destek sistemleri ve operasyonel verimlilik üzerindeki etkilerini uluslararası uygulama örnekleri üzerinden analiz etmektir. Yöntem:Çalışma, Avrupa, Asya-Pasifik, ABD ve Birleşik Krallık’ta uygulanan değer odaklı ve dijitalleşmiş sağlık modellerinin karşılaştırmalı bir politika ve uygulama analizi üzerine kuruludur. Avrupa’daki VALUECARE projesi, Asya-Pasifik bölgesindeki nüfus ölçekli tele-tıp sistemleri, ABD’deki Cedars-Sinai ve Cleveland Clinic platformları ile Birleşik Krallık’taki Cera modeli incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Analiz bulguları, yapay zekâ destekli VBC uygulamalarının hasta sonuçlarını iyileştirirken sağlık hizmeti maliyetlerini anlamlı düzeyde azalttığını göstermektedir. Türkiye’de e-Nabız altyapısı güçlü bir dijital temel sunmakla birlikte, AI entegrasyonu, veri yönetişimi ve çıktı odaklı ödeme modellerinde gelişime ihtiyaç olduğu saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Makale, 2026–2030 dönemine yönelik bir yol haritası önererek Türkiye’nin değer odaklı ve yapay zekâ destekli sağlık sistemleri alanında bölgesel liderlik potansiyeline sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Başarılı bir dönüşüm için dijital altyapının AI ile bütünleştirilmesi, güçlü veri yönetişimi mekanizmalarının kurulması ve performans temelli ödeme modellerinin yaygınlaştırılması kritik öneme sahiptir.

Keywords

The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye

Abstract

Objective: This article examines the digital rebirth of value-based care (VBC), positioning artificial intelligence (AI) as a core enabler of outcome-oriented, efficient, and sustainable healthcare delivery. The primary objective is to analyze how AI-driven models operationalize risk stratification, personalized care pathways, and system-wide efficiency within value-based frameworks. Methods:A comparative policy and implementation analysis was conducted using leading international examples. The study draws on the European VALUECARE initiative; population-level telemedicine and connected health programs across the Asia–Pacific region; AI-enabled platforms in the United States, including Cedars-Sinai, Cleveland Clinic, and Johns Hopkins; and the United Kingdom’s proactive home-care model implemented by Cera. Results: The analysis demonstrates that AI-enabled value-based care models significantly enhance patient outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Although Türkiye has a strong digital health infrastructure through the nationwide e-Nabız platform, gaps remain in AI integration, full interoperability, ethical data governance, and outcome-linked payment mechanisms. Conclusion:The article proposes a phased roadmap for the period 2026–2030 to accelerate Türkiye’s transition toward AI-driven value-based care. Strengthening interoperability, embedding ethical and algorithmic governance, and expanding outcome-based reimbursement models are identified as critical priorities. With targeted reforms, Türkiye has the potential to emerge as a regional leader in sustainable, high-value healthcare delivery.

Keywords

References

Birinci, Ş. (2023). A digital opportunity for patients to manage their health: Turkey National Personal Health Record System (The e-Nabız). Balkan Medical Journal. https://balkanmedicaljournal.org/text.php?lang=en&id=2496
Brazie, R. (2026). Assessing the Impact of Value-Based Care on Hospital Readmissions and Healthcare Costs (Doctoral dissertation, South College).
Busch, F., Geis, R., Wang, Y. C., Kather, J. N., Khori, N. A., Makowski, M. R., ... & Bressem, K. K. (2025). AI regulation in healthcare around the world: what is the status quo?. medRxiv, 2025-01. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.25.25321061
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). Value-based care. https://www.cms.gov/
Chen, M., & Decary, M. (2020) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: An essential guide for health leaders. In Healthcare management forum (Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 10-18). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470419873123
Cornelius, K. (2022). Transformation of Healthcare Sector in Asia-Pacific in the Post-COVID-19 Era.
Declan, A. B., & Taylor, R. A. (2026). Integrating mission-aligned value with cost to assess the economic impact of AI in healthcare. npj Digital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02892-z
Dun, C., Hicks, C. W., & Lehmann, H. P. (2026). The Potential Implications of Informatics for Value-Based Bare. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 33(4), 914-921. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag009

Eastburn, J., Fowkes, J., Kellner, K., & Swanson, B. (2024). Digital transformation: health systems’ investment priorities. McKinsey & Company. 2024.
European Commission. (2025). Digital tools support value-based integrated care for older people – VALUECARE Project Results in Brief. CORDIS.
Hunter, J., Dentino, P., & Jayakumar, P. (2025). The emergence of applied artificial intelligence in the realm of value based musculoskeletal care. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 18(10), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-025-09982-7
Islami, X., Mulolli, E., & Mustafa, N. (2025). Artificial intelligence and value-based strategy: A literature review and future research directions. Management Review Quarterly, 1-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00549-x
Garcia, J., Reddy, C. L., & Atun, R. (2023). Transitioning to High-Value Health Systems in G20+ Countries. https://doi.org/10.54111/0001/HSIL/thvhs
Kocaman, E. (2025). The place of digital transformation and artificial intelligence in Türkiye’s health policies: A qualitative evaluation. Health Sciences Quarterly, 5(4), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.26900/hsq.2799
Li, Z., Maimaiti, Z., Fu, J., Chen, J. Y., & Xu, C. (2023). Global research landscape on artificial intelligence in arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis. Digital health, 9, 20552076231184048. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231184048
Mahajan, R., & Uberoy, R. M. (2025). Generative AI: Unlocking the Next Chapter in Healthcare. CRC Press.
Naidoo, R. M., Karamathulla, M. Y. S., & Mernissi, A. (2025). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Advance Value-Based Contracting in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403212
Obeidat, M. (2025). From Bottlenecks to Blockchain and AI NeoMediX360 as a Scalable Next-Generation Platform for US Healthcare Logistics. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5249235
Sanz MF, Gil-Salmerón A, Ferrando M, Zanutto O, Bally ELS, Ceron S, Cheng D. VALUECARE Model for Value-Based, Integrated Health and Social Care Services Delivery Supported by ICT for Older Adults. Int J Integr Care. (2025) 11;25(1):9. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8931
Shah, R., Bozic, K. J., & Jayakumar, P. (2025). Artificial intelligence in value-based health care. HSS Journal®, 21(3), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316251340074
Tan, A. J. Q., Lee, E. W. Y., Evans, C. J., Lin, X., Yong, S. E. F., & Yang, G. M. (2026). Integrating specialist palliative care delivery in nursing homes: A scoping review. Palliative Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163261416286
World Economic Forum (WEF) (2024). The future of health: Value-based care in a post-pandemic world. World Economic Forum.
World Economic Forum. (2026). The global risks report 2026. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-global-risks-report-2026/
Zhang, L., Bullen, C., & Chen, J. (2025). Digital health innovations to catalyze the transition to value-based health care. JMIR Medical Informatics, 13, e57385. https //doi.org/10.2196/57385
Zincircioglu, G., & Kose, I. (2025). Driving EMR adoption to transform Türkiye’s healthcare system. In Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Strategies, Frameworks, and Global Case Studies to Shape Future Healthcare (pp. 73-85). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80704-6_6

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Ufuk Burak Karcıoğlu ^*
0009-0006-9131-6407
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 21, 2026

Submission Date

April 20, 2026

Acceptance Date

August 18, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 4

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA69NT57UG

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Karcıoğlu, U. B. (2026). The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye. Health Services Research Journal, 4, 53-61. https://izlik.org/JA69NT57UG

AMA

1.Karcıoğlu UB. The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye. HES Journal. 2026;4:53-61. https://izlik.org/JA69NT57UG

Chicago

Karcıoğlu, Ufuk Burak. 2026. “The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye”. Health Services Research Journal 4 (September): 53-61. https://izlik.org/JA69NT57UG.

EndNote

Karcıoğlu UB (September 1, 2026) The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye. Health Services Research Journal 4 53–61.

IEEE

[1]U. B. Karcıoğlu, “The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye”, HES Journal, vol. 4, pp. 53–61, Sept. 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA69NT57UG

ISNAD

Karcıoğlu, Ufuk Burak. “The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye”. Health Services Research Journal 4 (September 1, 2026): 53-61. https://izlik.org/JA69NT57UG.

JAMA

1.Karcıoğlu UB. The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye. HES Journal. 2026;4:53–61.

MLA

Karcıoğlu, Ufuk Burak. “The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye”. Health Services Research Journal, vol. 4, Sept. 2026, pp. 53-61, https://izlik.org/JA69NT57UG.

Vancouver

1.Ufuk Burak Karcıoğlu. The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye. HES Journal [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 1;4:53-61. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA69NT57UG

Manuscripts must be written in either Turkish or English. In order to ensure the smooth progress of the manuscript evaluation process, the following documents must be uploaded to the system completely and in accordance with the provided templates. The uploaded files will be reviewed, and in case of non-compliance with the template or missing documents, the author will be asked to make the necessary revisions.

Under the “Forms and Templates” page, the following documents can also be accessed:

The abstract should be written without a heading, must not exceed 250 words, and should include at least 3 and at most 5 keywords. Keywords must be separated by commas, and the first letter of each keyword must be capitalized.
A single space should be left after punctuation marks in the text.
In Turkish texts, commas should be used as decimal separators.
Lines should not begin with numbers, abbreviations, or symbols.
Frequently used terms consisting of multiple words should be abbreviated using their initials. Abbreviations should be defined at their first occurrence, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. Standard abbreviations such as TÜBİTAK or cm may be used without definition. Example: World Health Organization (WHO).
Similarity rates must not exceed 20% in total according to plagiarism detection software, and no single reference should exceed 1%.
APA (7th Edition) citation style must be used for both in-text citations and references. Accordingly, sources should be cited in parentheses with the author’s surname and year. Example: (Kaya, 2021; Aytaç and Yakın, 2024; Bulut et al., 2025).
References in the text must be consistent with the reference list. Reference management software (EndNote, Mendeley, etc.) may be used. DOI numbers must be included. If the manuscript is written in Turkish, “ve” should be used; if in English, “and” should be used.

Citation Format

Single Author
In-text (parenthetical):
→ (Kaya, 2021)

In-text (narrative):
→ Kaya (2021) stated that...

Reference list:
Kaya, M. (2019). Burnout levels and affecting factors among healthcare workers. Health and Society Journal, 29(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5455/stdergi.2019.14552

Two Authors
In-text (parenthetical):
→ (Yıldız and Demirtaş, 2020)

In-text (narrative):
→ Yıldız and Demirtaş (2020) stated that...

Reference list:
Yıldız, Z., Demirtaş, E. (2020). Problems encountered in the use of hospital information systems. Health Informatics Research Journal, 5(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.31023/sbad.2020.75

Three or More Authors
In-text (parenthetical):
→ (Evcili et al., 2012)

(Note: “vd.” is used in Turkish literature — “et al.” is used in English.)

In-text (narrative):
→ Evcili et al. (2012) stated that...

Reference list:
Evcili, H., Kara, F., Tunç, M. (2012). The use of electronic health records by nurses. Clinical and Experimental Research Journal, 4(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.17826/kdad.2012.22

Edited Books
Özbek, M. (Ed.) (2005). Public Sphere. Istanbul: Hil

Book Chapter in Edited Book
Kejanlıoğlu, B. (2005). The concept of public sphere in media studies. In Meral Özbek (Ed.), Public Sphere (pp. 689–713). Istanbul: Hil.

Books with Multiple Editions
Strunk, W. Jr., White, E. B. (2000). The Elements of Style (4th ed.). New York: Longman.

Electronic books and journals
Chan, H. F., Guillot, M., Page, L., Torgler, B. (2015). The inner quality of an article: Will time tell? Scientometrics, 104:19–41. DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1581y

Turner, S. J. (2010). Website statistics 2.0: Using Google Analytics to measure library website effectiveness. Technical Services Quarterly, 27:261–278. DOI: 10.1080/07317131003765910

Al, U., Soydal, İ. (2014). Library Turkey Project: Public library usage research. Turkish Librarianship, 28:288–307. Access link: http://www.tk.org.tr/index.php/TK

Web page
Hacettepe University. (n.d.). Mission, vision and values. Access link: http://hacettepe.edu.tr/hakkinda/misyonvizyondegerler (Access date: January 4, 2023)

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

The publication processes implemented by the Health Services Research Journal (HES Journal) serve as the foundation for the impartial and respected development and dissemination of knowledge. In this regard, the processes applied directly reflect the quality of the works of authors and the institutions supporting them. Peer-reviewed studies are those that concretely embody and support the scientific method. At this point, it is essential that all stakeholders of the process (authors, readers and researchers, publisher, reviewers, and editors) comply with ethical standards. Within the scope of publication ethics, our journal expects all stakeholders to adhere to the following ethical responsibilities.

The ethical duties and responsibilities outlined below have been prepared in accordance with the guidelines and policies published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) under open access principles.

A- Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Authors

Submitted manuscripts are expected to be original. If authors use or benefit from other works, they must provide complete and accurate citations and/or quotations. Paraphrasing methods, etc., are considered ethical violations by our journal.
Individuals who do not intellectually contribute to the content of the study should not be listed as authors.
In copyrighted works, the author who contributes the most should be listed as the first author; academic title superiority alone does not justify first authorship.
Any potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed in submitted manuscripts.
Authors may be requested to provide raw data during the evaluation process and must be prepared to submit such data to the editorial and scientific boards when required.
Authors must possess documentation proving they have the rights to use the data, necessary permissions for research/analysis, or informed consent from participants. Even if not requested by the journal, such documentation must be available.
If authors identify an error or mistake in a published, early-view, or under-review manuscript, they are obliged to inform the editor and cooperate in correction or retraction processes.
Authors may not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously. Each submission must follow the completion of the previous process. Previously published works cannot be submitted to our journal.
Changes in authorship (addition, removal, or order change) are not permitted after the evaluation process has begun. However, in the DergiPark system, such requests may be considered by HES Journal if submitted by the corresponding or first author with signed consent forms from all co-authors.

B- Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Editors

HES Journal editors and section editors are required to adhere to the following ethical duties and responsibilities based on the open-access guidelines published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), namely the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors:

Editors are responsible for all publications in the journal. In this context, they undertake the following roles and obligations:
Strive to meet the information needs of readers and authors.
Continuously work toward the development and improvement of the journal.
Take an active role in improving the quality of published works.
Support freedom of thought and encourage the inclusion of original and foreign-language works.
Ensure processes comply with intellectual property rights and ethical standards.
Ensure transparency in cases requiring correction or clarification.
Support field editors through guidance and communication via digital and verbal means.
Consider feedback from readers, researchers, and practitioners and provide informative responses.
Manuscripts within scope should be included in preliminary evaluation unless there is a serious issue.
Positive reviewer recommendations should not be ignored unless justified by serious concerns.
Decisions made by previous editors should not be changed without serious justification.
Assist section editors in maintaining the blind review process and prevent breaches of anonymity.
Ensure efficient management of peer-review and editorial workflows.
Encourage the development of the reviewer pool.
Protect intellectual property rights of all published works and defend the rights of authors and the journal against violations.
Take constructive criticism of published works into account.
Ensure authors are given the right to respond to criticism.
Handle complaints from authors, reviewers, and readers carefully and respond clearly and informatively.
Editorial independence must not be influenced by the publisher or any political or commercial entity.
Ensure rapid correction of errors, inconsistencies, or misleading statements in published works.

C- Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Section Editors

Assign reviewers appropriate to the manuscript’s subject area.
Provide necessary guidance and information for reviewers.
Monitor potential conflicts of interest between authors and reviewers.
Ensure confidentiality in the blind review process.
Encourage objective, scientific, and impartial evaluations.
Evaluate reviewer performance based on timeliness and quality.
Implement policies to improve reviewer performance.
Maintain and regularly update the reviewer database.
If both reviewers reject a manuscript, the section editor may, if deemed scientifically valuable, send it to a third or fourth reviewer.
Maintain communication with authors throughout the process.
Rejection decisions should be communicated respectfully and with clear justification.

D- Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers

Review at HES Journal is conducted under a double-blind peer review system. Reviewers must not communicate directly with authors.
Accept reviews only within their area of expertise.
Maintain confidentiality and impartiality.
Decline review if a conflict of interest exists.
Destroy manuscripts after review; only published final versions may be used.
Base evaluations solely on academic content, without discrimination.
Provide constructive and respectful feedback.
Complete reviews in a timely manner.
Protect intellectual property rights and journal copyrights.
Take precautions against academic misconduct, citation manipulation, and plagiarism.

E- Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of the Editorial Board

The Editorial Board of HES Journal is responsible for ensuring that all published articles comply with journal policies and international standards.

The editorial board consists of the Editor-in-Chief, Section Editors, Language Editors, Layout Editors, and Technical Editors.
Address deficiencies in content, technical, and visual aspects of the journal.
Actively participate in editorial meetings.
Hold regular meetings to improve journal policies and development.
Editorial independence must be maintained without interference from publishers.
Editors are responsible for all processes of submitted manuscripts.

F- Protection of Personal Data

HES Journal ensures the protection of personal data of research participants unless written consent is provided.
Protects personal data of editors, reviewers, authors, and readers.
Ensures protection of human and animal rights; manuscripts without ethics committee approval may be rejected.

G- Measures Against Misconduct

HES Journal takes necessary measures against misconduct and abuse of duty. Allegations are carefully investigated, and findings are evaluated objectively and reported by the editorial board.

H- Research and Publication Ethics

Research ethics ensures that studies are designed and conducted in accordance with ethical principles such as autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. The journal ensures that ethical issues, including conflicts of interest, are evaluated within international legal and ethical frameworks and ultimately decided by the ICAM Network Ethics Committee.

I- Handling Ethical Violations

Any unethical behavior or content beyond the responsibilities stated above should be reported to the HES Journal email address. Reports are evaluated by the editorial board and concluded with a final decision.

Baş Editör

Funda EVCILI

Health Sciences

Editor

Gülay DEMIR

Decision Support and Group Support Systems, Data Analysis, Biostatistics, Large and Complex Data Theory, Statistical Analysis, Spatial Statistics, Quantitative Decision Methods , Theory of Sampling, Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Alan Editörleri

ŞE

Şükran ERTEKIN PINAR

Mental Health Nursing

Gülay DEMIR

Decision Support and Group Support Systems, Data Analysis, Biostatistics, Large and Complex Data Theory, Statistical Analysis, Spatial Statistics, Quantitative Decision Methods , Theory of Sampling, Multiple Criteria Decision Making

HG

Handan GÜLER

Health Sciences, Midwifery, Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynocology Nursing

Gülşen GÜÇLÜ

Biological Sciences, Plant Biochemistry, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Genetics

Ferdağ YILDIRIM

Pediatric Health and Illnesses Nursing

Mine BEKAR

Obstetrics and Gynocology Nursing

Fatma HASTAOĞLU

Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health Sciences, Nursing, Internal Diseases Nursing, Aged Health Care

Berna BAYSAL BAKAY

Medical Parasitology

Sebahattin KARABULUT

Medical Physiology (Other)

Songül ULUSOY

Analytical Chemistry, Analytical Spectrometry, Bioassays, Instrumental Methods, Separation Science

SH

Sevda HASTAOĞLU ÖRGEN

Terrestrial Ecology, Evolutionary Ecology, Animal Systematics and Taxonomy, Entomology

Erdoğan ÖZDEMIR

Physics Education

PÇ

Pelin ÇELIK

Nursing, Internal Diseases Nursing

Ayşegül ÖZTÜRK

Physiopathology, Cell Physiology

AÇ

Arzuhan ÇETINDAĞ

Physiopathology, Health Sciences, Nursing

Fatma TOK YILDIZ

Nursing, Fundamentals of Nursing

Kübra ASLAN

Health Policy, Health Literacy, Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation, Digital Health, People With Disability, Patient Safety, Health Management, Aged Health Care, Health Services and Systems (Other)

Yazım ve Dil Editörleri

TH

Tuğba HERGÜNER

Prosthodontics, Dental Public Health

Ezgi YILDIZ

Fundamentals of Nursing

BÇ

Betül Esra ÇEVIK

Health Sciences Education and Development of Programs: Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Public Health Nursing

Mizanpaj Editörleri

BS

Buse SEMERCI ARIKAN

Medical Biochemistry - Amino Acids and Metabolites, Medical Biochemistry - Carbohydrates, Medical Biochemistry - Proteins, Peptides and Proteomics

Kübra ASLAN

Health Policy, Health Literacy, Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation, Digital Health, People With Disability, Patient Safety, Health Management, Aged Health Care, Health Services and Systems (Other)

Teknik Editörler

Burak ATIK

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation

Mehmed KOÇ

Artificial Intelligence (Other), Nanotechnology

The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye

Değerin Dijital Yeniden Doğuşu: Uluslararası Modeller, Yapay Zekâ Merkezli Dönüşüm ve Türkiye İçin Stratejik Atılım

Abstract

Keywords

The Digital Rebirth of Value: International Models, AI at the Core, and Strategic Leap for Value-Based Care in Türkiye

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite

Aim & Scope

Author Guidelines

Citation Format

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Indexes

Other Indexes

Journal Boards

Baş Editör

Editor

Alan Editörleri

Yazım ve Dil Editörleri

Mizanpaj Editörleri

Teknik Editörler

	Türk Medline Ulusal Sağlık Bilimleri Süreli Yayınlar Veritabanı
	ResearchBib