BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye'de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi

Year 2018, Issue: 3, 542 - 551, 01.12.2018

Abstract

Bu çalışma Türkiye’de son yıllarda yükseköğretimin yaygınlaşmasının toplumsal tabakalaşmaya dayalı sosyo-ekonomik eşitsizlikler üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. TÜİK Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi ve Yetişkin Eğitimi Araştırması verileri kullanılarak yapılan analizlerde ebeveyn mesleki statüsü, birey eğitim düzeyi ve birey mesleki statüsü üçgenindeki ilişkiler ele alınmış, yükseköğretimin yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte ebeveyn mesleki statüsü ile birey mesleki statüsü arasındaki ilişkilerin zayıfladığı görülmüştür. Ancak, ebeveyn mesleki statüsünün bireyin eğitim düzeyi üzerinde hâlâ yüksek bir etkisinin olduğu, dolayısıyla toplumsal tabakalaşmanın yeniden üretiminin eğitime eşit erişimin sağlanması yoluyla değil, bir bileşik etki ile azaldığı bulunmuştur. Bu azalma uluslararası literatürde olduğu gibi, üniversite düzeyinde eğitim alan bireylerin mesleki statülerinin ebeveynlerinin mesleki statüsünden daha az etkilenmesi ve Türkiye’de yükseköğretim düzeyinde eğitim alanların oranının hızla artmasıyla mümkün olmuştur. Lojistik regresyon analizi, üniversite derecesine erişim konusunda cinsiyet, ebeveyn mesleki statüsü, anne ve baba eğitim düzeyi ve kuşak değişkenlerinin hâlâ önemli ölçüde etkin olduğunu göstermektedir. Ebeveyn ve çocukların eğitim ve meslek düzeylerine ilişkin daha detaylı bilgiler içeren verilerle yapılacak analizler toplumsal eşitsizliklerin lisansüstü dereceler veya eğitimin niteliği üzerinden yeniden üretilip üretilmediğini gösterebilecektir

References

  • Ballarino, G., Bernardi, F., Requena, M., & Schadee, H. (2009). Persistent Inequalities? Expansion of Education and Class Inequality in Italy and Spain. European Sociological Review, 25(1), 123-138. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn031
  • Bar-Haim, E., & Shavit, Y. (2013). Expansion and inequality of educational opportunity: A comparative study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 31(1), 22-31. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.10.001
  • aktarılmış olabilir. Yakın zamanda Torche (2011), ABD örneğin
  • Hout, M. (1988). More universalism , less structural mobility : The American occupational structure in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 93(6), 1358-1400.
  • Hout, M., & Dohan, M. P. (1996). Two paths to educational opportunity: Class and educational selection in Sweden and the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Hout, M., Raftery, A. E., & Bell, E. O. (1993). Making the grade: Educational stratification in the United States, 1925–1989. In Y. Shavit & H.-P. Blossfeld (Eds.). Persistent ınequality. Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries (pp. 25-49). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Jennrich, R. (1970). An asymptotic chi2 test for the equality of two correlation matrices. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(330), 904-912.
  • Kılıç, Y. (2014). Türkiye’de eğitimsel eşitsizlik ve toplumsal tabakalaşma. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 243- 263. http://doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.42.14
  • Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained ınequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642-1690.
  • Mare, R. D. (1981). Change and stability in educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 46(1), 72-87. http://doi.org/10.2307/2095027
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ education/skills-beyond-school/education-at-a-glance-2016- indicators.htm
  • Özdemir, C. (2016). Equity in the Turkish education system: A multilevel analysis of social background influences on the mathematics performance of 15-year-old students. European Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 179-213. http://doi. org/10.1177/1474904115627159
  • Parsons, T. (1959). The school class as a social system: some of its functions in American society. Harvard Educational Review, 29(4), 297-318.
  • Pfeffer, F. T. (2008). Persistent ınequality in educational attainment and its institutional context. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 543-565. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn026
  • Raftery, A. E., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921-75. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 41-62. http://doi. org/10.2307/2112784
  • Reimer, D., & Pollak, R. (2010). Educational expansion and its consequences for vertical and horizontal inequalities in access to higher education in West Germany. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 415-430. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp029
  • Rotman, A., Shavit, Y., & Shalev, M. (2015). Nominal and Positional Perspectives on Educational Stratification in Israel. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(in press), 17-24. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.001
  • Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1993). Persisting barriers: Changes in educational opportunities in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Smith, H. L., & Cheung, P. P. (1986). Trends in the effects of family background on educational attainment in the Philippines. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1387-1408. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1086/228426
  • Vallet, L. A. (2004). Change in intergenerational class mobility in France from the 1970s to the 1990s and its explanation: An analysis following the CASMIN approach. Social Mobility in Europe, 1-37. http://doi.org/10.1093/0199258457.003.0005
  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Tam, T., Shavit, Y., & Park, H. (2018). A positional model of intergenerational educational mobility: Crucial tests based on 35 societies. https://doi.org/10.17605/ OSF.IO/7Q8NA
  • Wright, E. O. (2014). Sınıf analizine yaklaşımlar. (V. S. Öğütle, Trans.). Ankara: NotaBene Yayınları.
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2017). Yükseköğretim bilgi yönetim sistemi. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr
  • Retrieved from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri. do?id=24623
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2013). Yetişkin eğitimi, 2012. Ankara: TÜİK Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 15865, Tarih: 31 Temmuz 2013. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=15865

The Effects of Expansion of Higher Education on Social Stratification in Turkey

Year 2018, Issue: 3, 542 - 551, 01.12.2018

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of expansion of Turkish higher education in recent years on socio-economic inequalities based on social stratification. The analyses based on the data from TURKSTAT Household Labor Force Survey and Adult Education Research focus on the relationships between parental social status, education level of the individual and occupational status of the individual. It is found that as higher education expanded, the relationship between occupational status of the parents and occupational status of the individual have been weakened. However, it is also observed that the effect of parental occupational status on the educational level of the individual is still high, and thus the reproduction of social stratification is not weakened through equal access to education but via a compositional effect. As in the international literature, this weakening relationship is a result of the fact that the occupational status of the individuals with higher education is affected less from the occupational status of their parents. With recent expansion in higher education in Turkey, the number of individuals with a university degree has increased rapidly. Logistic regression analysis reveals that gender, parental occupational status, mother education level, father education level and cohort variables still have significant effects on the attainment of a university degree. Further analyses with data containing detailed information about parental and individual educational level and occupational status would show whether the social inequalities are perpetuated via advanced degrees or the quality of education

References

  • Ballarino, G., Bernardi, F., Requena, M., & Schadee, H. (2009). Persistent Inequalities? Expansion of Education and Class Inequality in Italy and Spain. European Sociological Review, 25(1), 123-138. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn031
  • Bar-Haim, E., & Shavit, Y. (2013). Expansion and inequality of educational opportunity: A comparative study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 31(1), 22-31. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.10.001
  • aktarılmış olabilir. Yakın zamanda Torche (2011), ABD örneğin
  • Hout, M. (1988). More universalism , less structural mobility : The American occupational structure in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 93(6), 1358-1400.
  • Hout, M., & Dohan, M. P. (1996). Two paths to educational opportunity: Class and educational selection in Sweden and the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Hout, M., Raftery, A. E., & Bell, E. O. (1993). Making the grade: Educational stratification in the United States, 1925–1989. In Y. Shavit & H.-P. Blossfeld (Eds.). Persistent ınequality. Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries (pp. 25-49). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Jennrich, R. (1970). An asymptotic chi2 test for the equality of two correlation matrices. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(330), 904-912.
  • Kılıç, Y. (2014). Türkiye’de eğitimsel eşitsizlik ve toplumsal tabakalaşma. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 243- 263. http://doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.42.14
  • Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained ınequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642-1690.
  • Mare, R. D. (1981). Change and stability in educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 46(1), 72-87. http://doi.org/10.2307/2095027
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ education/skills-beyond-school/education-at-a-glance-2016- indicators.htm
  • Özdemir, C. (2016). Equity in the Turkish education system: A multilevel analysis of social background influences on the mathematics performance of 15-year-old students. European Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 179-213. http://doi. org/10.1177/1474904115627159
  • Parsons, T. (1959). The school class as a social system: some of its functions in American society. Harvard Educational Review, 29(4), 297-318.
  • Pfeffer, F. T. (2008). Persistent ınequality in educational attainment and its institutional context. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 543-565. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn026
  • Raftery, A. E., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921-75. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 41-62. http://doi. org/10.2307/2112784
  • Reimer, D., & Pollak, R. (2010). Educational expansion and its consequences for vertical and horizontal inequalities in access to higher education in West Germany. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 415-430. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp029
  • Rotman, A., Shavit, Y., & Shalev, M. (2015). Nominal and Positional Perspectives on Educational Stratification in Israel. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(in press), 17-24. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.001
  • Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1993). Persisting barriers: Changes in educational opportunities in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Smith, H. L., & Cheung, P. P. (1986). Trends in the effects of family background on educational attainment in the Philippines. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1387-1408. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1086/228426
  • Vallet, L. A. (2004). Change in intergenerational class mobility in France from the 1970s to the 1990s and its explanation: An analysis following the CASMIN approach. Social Mobility in Europe, 1-37. http://doi.org/10.1093/0199258457.003.0005
  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Tam, T., Shavit, Y., & Park, H. (2018). A positional model of intergenerational educational mobility: Crucial tests based on 35 societies. https://doi.org/10.17605/ OSF.IO/7Q8NA
  • Wright, E. O. (2014). Sınıf analizine yaklaşımlar. (V. S. Öğütle, Trans.). Ankara: NotaBene Yayınları.
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2017). Yükseköğretim bilgi yönetim sistemi. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr
  • Retrieved from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri. do?id=24623
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2013). Yetişkin eğitimi, 2012. Ankara: TÜİK Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 15865, Tarih: 31 Temmuz 2013. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=15865
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Caner Özdemir This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Özdemir, C. (2018). Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi. Yükseköğretim Ve Bilim Dergisi(3), 542-551.
AMA Özdemir C. Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi. J Higher Edu Sci. December 2018;(3):542-551.
Chicago Özdemir, Caner. “Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi”. Yükseköğretim Ve Bilim Dergisi, no. 3 (December 2018): 542-51.
EndNote Özdemir C (December 1, 2018) Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 3 542–551.
IEEE C. Özdemir, “Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi”, J Higher Edu Sci, no. 3, pp. 542–551, December 2018.
ISNAD Özdemir, Caner. “Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi”. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 3 (December 2018), 542-551.
JAMA Özdemir C. Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi. J Higher Edu Sci. 2018;:542–551.
MLA Özdemir, Caner. “Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi”. Yükseköğretim Ve Bilim Dergisi, no. 3, 2018, pp. 542-51.
Vancouver Özdemir C. Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Yaygınlaşmasının Toplumsal Tabakalaşmaya Etkisi. J Higher Edu Sci. 2018(3):542-51.