Investigation of Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Channel Capacity for Different Environment and System Parameters

Year 2020, , 279 - 285, 31.12.2020

Yiğit Mahmutoğlu Cenk Albayrak Kadir Türk

https://doi.org/10.17350/HJSE19030000197

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) systems using the blue / green bands of the visible light spectrum stand out as an important solution in underwater applications that require high data communication rate such as remote sensing and navigation, real-time video transmission and imaging. The main factor that limits the data communication distance and determines the data rate in UWOC systems is the disruptive (absorption and scattering) effects of the underwater environment on optical waves. In this study, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and channel capacity for UWOC systems are presented according to the divergence angle of the beam and the change in the aperture diameter of the receiver, which are the important parameters for UWOC systems. These examinations were repeated for pure sea water, clean ocean water, coastal ocean water and harbor water environments commonly used in the literature, and the obtained results were compared. With the presented results, the current limits for UWOC systems have been revealed and provide predictions about the applications that can be realized with UWOC systems for different environments.

Keywords

Underwater Wireless Optical Communication, Channel Capacity, Underwater Wireless Optical Channel, Underwater Optical Noise, Underwater Environments

References

• 1. Quazi AH, Konrad WL. Underwater acoustic communications. IEEE Communications Magazine 20 (1982) 24–30.
• 2. Miramirkhani F, Uysal M. Visible Light Communication Channel Modeling for Underwater Environments with Blocking and Shadowing. IEEE Access 6 (2017) 1082-1090.
• 3. Chen H, Chen X, Lu J, Liu X, Shi J, Zheng L, Liu R, Zhou X., Tian P. Toward Long-Distance Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Based on A High-Sensitivity Single Photon Avalanche Diode. IEEE Photonics Journal 12 (2020) 7902510.
• 4. Shihada B, Amin O, Bainbridge C, Jardak S, Alkhazragi O, Ng TK, Ooi B, Berumen M, Alouini MS. Aqua-Fi: Delivering Internet Underwater Using Wireless Optical Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 58 (2020) 84-89.
• 5. Kaushal H, Kaddoum G. Underwater Optical Wireless Communication. IEEE Access 4 (2016) 1518–1547.
• 6. Che X, Wells I, Dickers G, Kear P, Gong X. Re-Evaluation of RF Electromagnetic Communication in Underwater Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 48 (2010) 143–151.
• 7. Wu TC, Chi YC, Wang HY. Blue laser diode enables underwater communication at 12.4Gbps. Scientific Reports 7 (2017) 1–10.
• 8. Miller JK, Morgan K, Li W, Li Y, Johnson, E. Data Agile Underwater Optical Communication Link using Flexible Data Formats and Orbital Angular Momentum Multiplexing. Paper presented at OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE, Charleston, SC, USA, 22-25 October, IEEE, pp. 1–4, 2018.
• 9. Cochenour B, Mullen L, Laux A. Spatial and temporal dispersion in high bandwidth underwater laser communication links. Paper presented at IEEE Military Commununications Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 16-19 November, IEEE, pp. 1–7, 2008.
• 10. Jaruwatanadilok S. Underwater wireless optical communication channel modeling and performance evaluation using vector radiative transfer theory. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 26 (2008) 1620–1627.
• 11. Gabriel C, Khalighi A, Bourennane S, Léon R, Rigaud V. Optical communication system for an underwater wireless sensor network. Paper presented at EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 22-27 April, pp. 2685, 2012.
• 12. Ali M. Characteristics of Optical Channel for Underwater Optical Wireless Communication System. IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 10 (2015) 1-9.
• 13. .Li J, Ma Y, Zhou Q, Wang H. Channel capacity study of underwater wireless optical communications links based on Monte Carlo simulation. Journal Of Optics A: Pure And Applied Optics 14 (2012) 015403.
• 14. Matta G, Agrawal M, Bahl R. Channel Capacity for Underwater Visible Light Communication Systems. Paper presented at Oceans 2019, Marseille, France, 17-20 June, IEEE, pp. 1-4, 2019.
• 15. Shin M, Park K, Alouini M. Statistical Modeling of the Impact of Underwater Bubbles on an Optical Wireless Channel. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society 1(2020) 808-818.
• 16. Zhang S, Zhang L, Wang Z, Quan J, Cheng J, Dong Y. On Performance of Underwater Wireless Optical Communications Under Turbulence, Paper presented at IEEE 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 10-13 January, IEEE, pp. 1-2, 2020.
• 17. Arnon S. Underwater optical wireless communication network. Optical Engineering 49 (2010) 015001-1–015001-6.
• 18. Zeng Z, Fu S, Zhang H, Dong Y, Cheng J. A Survey of Underwater Optical Wireless Communications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19 (2017) 204–238.
• 19. Giles JW, Bankman IN. Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations. Paper presented at IEEE Military Communications Conference, Atlantic City, NJ, USA, 17-20 October, IEEE, pp. 1–6, 2005.
• 20. Zhang H, Dong Y, Hui L. On Capacity of Downlink Underwater Wireless Optical MIMO Systems With Random Sea Surface. IEEE Communications Letters 19 (2015) 2166–2169.
• 21. Sticklus J, Hoeher PA, Röttgers, R. Optical Underwater Communication: The Potential of Using Converted Green LEDs in Coastal Waters. IEEE Journal Of Oceanic Engineering 44 (2019) 535–547.
• 22. Manor H, Arnon S. Performance of an optical wireless communication system as a function of wavelength. Applied Optics 42 (2003) 4285–4294.
• 23. Boucouvalas AC. Underwater Optical Wireless Communications With Optical Amplification and Spatial Diversity. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 28 (2016) 2613–2616.