Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 501 - 512, 01.10.2019

Abstract

DOI: 10.5152/hsp.2019.552657


Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, huzurevlerinde
yaşayan yaşlı bireylerin genel profilleri ile sağlık problemlerini belirlemek,
bu bireylerin yaşam doyumu ile sosyal destek algısını sosyo-demografik
değişkenler açısından değerlendirmek ve yaşam doyumu ile sosyal destek algısı
değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymaktır.



Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, Türkiye’de altı
huzurevinde gerçekleştirildi. Veriler, anket formu ile toplandı ve SPSS 17.0
for Windows paket programı kullanılarak analiz edildi.



Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması
75,926 bulundu. Katılımcıların çoğunluğunun erkek, kimsesiz ve bir kronik
hastalığı olan yaşlılardan oluştuğu belirlendi. Katılımcılarda en fazla tanı
konmuş kalp-damar hastalığı olduğu ve büyük çoğunluğunun günde en az bir ilaç
kullandığı saptandı. Genel olarak katılımcıların huzurevlerinden memnun olduğu
belirlendi. Ayrıca katılımcıların yaşam doyumu kısmen yüksek düzeyde ve sosyal
destek algısı orta düzeyde bulundu. Katılımcıların yaşam doyumunun medeni
durum, eğitim, sosyal güvence durumu, ekonomik durum, yakını olması, günlük
aktivite, aktiviteye isteklilik, diğer yaşlı bireylerle ilişki, çalışanlarla
ilişki ve huzurevinden genel memnuniyet değişkenlerine göre anlamlı fark
gösterdiği belirlendi (p<0.05). Ayrıca, katılımcıların sosyal destek
algısının cinsiyet, medeni durum, eğitim, sosyal güvence durumu, ekonomik
durum, çocukları ile görüşme, aktiviteye isteklilik, diğer yaşlı bireylerle
ilişki, çalışanlarla ilişki ve huzurevinden genel memnuniyet değişkenlerine
göre anlamlı fark gösterdiği bulundu (p<0.05).



Sonuç: Katılımcıların yaşam doyumu ve
sosyal destek algısı sosyo-demografik değişkenlere göre değişmektedir. Ayrıca
katılımcıların yaşam doyumu ve sosyal destek algısı arasında pozitif yönlü
güçlü bir ilişki vardır. 

Cite this article as: Yanık A, Sağlam Y.
Evaluation of Life Satisfaction and Social Support Perception of Elderly
Individuals. Journal of Health Science and Profession 2019; 6(3): 501-12.

References

  • 1. Lupien SJ, Wan N. Successful ageing: from cell to self. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359(1449): 1413-26. [CrossRef] 2. World Health Organization. Ageing and health. Retrived from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs404/en/, 2017. 3. Ozmete E, Hussein S. Elderly Care Services Report in Turkey. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family and Social Policies, Ankara, 2017. 4. Aksoydan E. Are developing countries ready for ageing populations? An examination on the sociodemographic, economic and health status of elderly in Turkey. Turk Geriatri Dergisi 2009; 12(2): 102-9. 5. Banjare P, Dwivedi R, Pradhan J. Factors associated with the life satisfaction amongst the rural elderly in Odisha, India. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015; 13(201): 1-13. [CrossRef] 6. Tsuji K, Khan HTA. Exploring the relationship between social support and life satisfaction among rural elderly in Japan. Ageing International. 2016; 41: 414-26. [CrossRef] 7. Akin A, Yalniz A. Turkish version of contentment with life scale (Clas): the study of validity and reliability. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences. 2015; 14(54): 95-102. 8. Yalcin I. Relationships between well-being and social support: a meta-analysis of studies conducted in Turkey. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2015; 26(1): 1-11. 9. Bishop AJ, Martin P, Poon L. Happiness and congruence in older adulthood: A structural model of life satisfaction. Aging Ment Health, 2006; 10(5): 445-53. [CrossRef] 10. Oztop H, Sener A, Guven S, Dogan, N. Influences of intergeneratıonal support on life satısfaction of the elderly: A Turkısh Sample. Social Behavior And Personality. 2009; 37(7): 957-70. [CrossRef] 11. Natan MB. Perceptions of nurses, families, and residents in nursing homes concerning residents’ needs. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008; 14(3): 195-9. [CrossRef] 12. Meckl-Sloan C. How health relationship management services (HRMS) benefts the elderly. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2016; 6(2): 138-42. [CrossRef] 13. Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldiz H. Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 2001; 12(1): 17-25. [CrossRef] 14. Poulin J, Deng R, Ingersoll TS, Witt H, Swain M. Perceived family and friend support and the psychological well-being of American and Chinese elderly persons. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2012; 27(4): 305-17. [CrossRef] 15. Capezuti E, Hamers JPH. Perspectives on how to improve the nursing care of older adults. Int J Nurs Stud 2013; 50(9): 1153-5. [CrossRef] 16. Hu SXX, Lei WI, Chao KK, Hall BJ, Chung SF. Common chronic health problems and life satisfaction among Macau elderly people. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2016; 3(4): 367-70. [CrossRef] 17. Koc Z. Determination of older people’s level of loneliness. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21(21-22): 3037-46. [CrossRef] 18. Lee GE. Predictors of adjustment to nursing home life of elderly residents: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 47(8): 957-64. [CrossRef] 19. Lucchetti M, Corsonello A, Fabbietti P, Greco C, Mazzei B, Pranno L, et al. Relationship betweeen socio-economic features and health status in elderly hospitalized patient. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009; 49(1): 163-72. [CrossRef] 20. Wolff FC. Well-being of elderly people living in nursing homes: the benefits of making friends. International Review for Social Sciences (KYKLOS). 2013; 66(1): 153-71. [CrossRef] 21. Prevc P, Topic MD. Age identity, social influence and socialization through physical activity in elderly people living in a nursing home. Coll Antropol. 2009; 33(4): 1107-14. 22. Nakrem S, Vinsnes AG, Seim A. Residents’ experiences of interpersonal factors in nursing home care: A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011; 48(11): 1357-66. [CrossRef] 23. Park J, Roh S, Yeo Y. Religiosity, social support, and life satisfaction among elderly Korean immigrants. Gerontologist. 2012; 52(5): 641-9. [CrossRef] 24. Shen Y, Yeatts DE. Social support and life satisfaction among older adults in China: family-based support versus community-based support. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2013; 77(3): 189-209. [CrossRef] 25. Drages J, Kirkevold M, Espehaug B. Loneliness and social support among nursing home residents without cognitive impairment: A questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011; 48(5): 611-9. [CrossRef] 26. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Influences on loneliness in older adults: a meta-analysis. Basic And Applied Social Psychology. 2001; 23(4): 245-66. [CrossRef]

Evaluating the Perception of Life Satisfaction and Social Support of the Elderly Individuals

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 501 - 512, 01.10.2019

Abstract

DOI: 10.5152/hsp.2019.552657


Objective: We aimed to determine the
general profiles and health problems of the elderly individuals living in
nursing homes (NHs), evaluate the life satisfaction and social support
perception of these individuals in terms of sociodemographic variables, and
provide a relationship between life satisfaction and social support perception
variables.



Materials and methods: Six NHs in Turkey
were selected for the study. Data were collected through a questionnaire and
analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences Software (SPSS™)
version 17.00 software for Windows.



Results: The average age of the
participants was 75.926 years. Majority of them were males, homeless, and
elderly individuals with a chronic disease. Additionally, cardiovascular
disease was most commonly diagnosed, and majority of them took the least one drug
daily. The participants were generally satisfied with the NHs. Further, it was
found that life satisfaction of the participants was at a partially high level,
and social support perception was at the moderate level. It was determined that
life satisfaction of the participants showed significant differences according
to the marital status, education, social security, economic condition, having a
relative, daily activity, willingness toward performing the activities,
relation with other elders, relation with the staff, and general satisfaction
with the NH (p<0.05). The social support perception of the participants
showed significant differences according to the gender, marital status,
education, social security, economic condition, state of seeing children,
willingness toward performing activities, relations with other elders,
relations with the staff, and general satisfaction with NH (p<0.05).



Conclusions: Life satisfaction and social
support perception of the participants change according to the sociodemographic
variables. Further, a positive and strong correlation was found between life
satisfaction and social support perception. 

Cite this article as: Yanık A, Sağlam Y.
Evaluation of Life Satisfaction and Social Support Perception of Elderly
Individuals. Journal of Health Science and Profession 2019; 6(3): 501-12.

References

  • 1. Lupien SJ, Wan N. Successful ageing: from cell to self. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359(1449): 1413-26. [CrossRef] 2. World Health Organization. Ageing and health. Retrived from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs404/en/, 2017. 3. Ozmete E, Hussein S. Elderly Care Services Report in Turkey. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family and Social Policies, Ankara, 2017. 4. Aksoydan E. Are developing countries ready for ageing populations? An examination on the sociodemographic, economic and health status of elderly in Turkey. Turk Geriatri Dergisi 2009; 12(2): 102-9. 5. Banjare P, Dwivedi R, Pradhan J. Factors associated with the life satisfaction amongst the rural elderly in Odisha, India. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015; 13(201): 1-13. [CrossRef] 6. Tsuji K, Khan HTA. Exploring the relationship between social support and life satisfaction among rural elderly in Japan. Ageing International. 2016; 41: 414-26. [CrossRef] 7. Akin A, Yalniz A. Turkish version of contentment with life scale (Clas): the study of validity and reliability. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences. 2015; 14(54): 95-102. 8. Yalcin I. Relationships between well-being and social support: a meta-analysis of studies conducted in Turkey. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2015; 26(1): 1-11. 9. Bishop AJ, Martin P, Poon L. Happiness and congruence in older adulthood: A structural model of life satisfaction. Aging Ment Health, 2006; 10(5): 445-53. [CrossRef] 10. Oztop H, Sener A, Guven S, Dogan, N. Influences of intergeneratıonal support on life satısfaction of the elderly: A Turkısh Sample. Social Behavior And Personality. 2009; 37(7): 957-70. [CrossRef] 11. Natan MB. Perceptions of nurses, families, and residents in nursing homes concerning residents’ needs. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008; 14(3): 195-9. [CrossRef] 12. Meckl-Sloan C. How health relationship management services (HRMS) benefts the elderly. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2016; 6(2): 138-42. [CrossRef] 13. Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldiz H. Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 2001; 12(1): 17-25. [CrossRef] 14. Poulin J, Deng R, Ingersoll TS, Witt H, Swain M. Perceived family and friend support and the psychological well-being of American and Chinese elderly persons. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2012; 27(4): 305-17. [CrossRef] 15. Capezuti E, Hamers JPH. Perspectives on how to improve the nursing care of older adults. Int J Nurs Stud 2013; 50(9): 1153-5. [CrossRef] 16. Hu SXX, Lei WI, Chao KK, Hall BJ, Chung SF. Common chronic health problems and life satisfaction among Macau elderly people. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2016; 3(4): 367-70. [CrossRef] 17. Koc Z. Determination of older people’s level of loneliness. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21(21-22): 3037-46. [CrossRef] 18. Lee GE. Predictors of adjustment to nursing home life of elderly residents: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 47(8): 957-64. [CrossRef] 19. Lucchetti M, Corsonello A, Fabbietti P, Greco C, Mazzei B, Pranno L, et al. Relationship betweeen socio-economic features and health status in elderly hospitalized patient. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009; 49(1): 163-72. [CrossRef] 20. Wolff FC. Well-being of elderly people living in nursing homes: the benefits of making friends. International Review for Social Sciences (KYKLOS). 2013; 66(1): 153-71. [CrossRef] 21. Prevc P, Topic MD. Age identity, social influence and socialization through physical activity in elderly people living in a nursing home. Coll Antropol. 2009; 33(4): 1107-14. 22. Nakrem S, Vinsnes AG, Seim A. Residents’ experiences of interpersonal factors in nursing home care: A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011; 48(11): 1357-66. [CrossRef] 23. Park J, Roh S, Yeo Y. Religiosity, social support, and life satisfaction among elderly Korean immigrants. Gerontologist. 2012; 52(5): 641-9. [CrossRef] 24. Shen Y, Yeatts DE. Social support and life satisfaction among older adults in China: family-based support versus community-based support. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2013; 77(3): 189-209. [CrossRef] 25. Drages J, Kirkevold M, Espehaug B. Loneliness and social support among nursing home residents without cognitive impairment: A questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011; 48(5): 611-9. [CrossRef] 26. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Influences on loneliness in older adults: a meta-analysis. Basic And Applied Social Psychology. 2001; 23(4): 245-66. [CrossRef]
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Aygül Yanık

Yalçın Sağlam This is me

Publication Date October 1, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Yanık, A., & Sağlam, Y. (n.d.). Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi, 6(3), 501-512.
AMA Yanık A, Sağlam Y. Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi. HSP. 6(3):501-512.
Chicago Yanık, Aygül, and Yalçın Sağlam. “Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu Ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi”. Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi 6, no. 3 n.d.: 501-12.
EndNote Yanık A, Sağlam Y Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi 6 3 501–512.
IEEE A. Yanık and Y. Sağlam, “Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi”, HSP, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 501–512.
ISNAD Yanık, Aygül - Sağlam, Yalçın. “Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu Ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi”. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi 6/3 (n.d.), 501-512.
JAMA Yanık A, Sağlam Y. Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi. HSP.;6:501–512.
MLA Yanık, Aygül and Yalçın Sağlam. “Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu Ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi”. Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 501-12.
Vancouver Yanık A, Sağlam Y. Yaşlı Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyal Destek Algısının Değerlendirilmesi. HSP. 6(3):501-12.