Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2025, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 31.01.2025

Abstract

References

  • 1. Velloso M, Stella SG, Cendon S, Silva AC, Jardim JR. Metabolic and ventilatory parameters of four activities of daily living accomplished with arms in COPD patients. Chest. 2003;123(4):1047-53.
  • 2. Meijer K, Annegarn J, Lima Passos V, Savelberg HH, Schols AM, Wouters EF, et al. Characteristics of daily arm activities in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(6):1631-41.
  • 3. Cakmak A, Kocaaga E, Sonbahar-Ulu H, Inal-Ince D, Vardar-Yagli N, Calik-Kutukcu E, et al. Upper Extremity Exercise Capacity and Activities of Daily Living in Individuals With Bronchiectasis Versus Healthy Controls. Phys Ther. 2023;103(4).
  • 4. Mackey M, Ellis E, Nicholls M. Breathing patterns and heart rate during simulated occupational upper limb tasks in normal subjects. Physiother Res Int. 1998;3(2):83-99.
  • 5. Kathiresan G, Jeyaraman SK, Jaganathan J. Effect of upper extremity exercise in people with COPD. J Thorac Dis. 2010;2(4):223-36.
  • 6. Lima VP, Iamonti VC, Velloso M, Janaudis-Ferreira T. Physiological Responses to Arm Activity in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Compared With Healthy Controls: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016;36(6):402-12.
  • 7. Takahashi T, Jenkins SC, Strauss GR, Watson CP, Lake FR. A new unsupported upper limb exercise test for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003;23(6):430-7.
  • 8. Hill CJ, Denehy L, Holland AE, McDonald CF. Measurement of functional activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the grocery shelving task. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(6):402-9.
  • 9. Shah KM, Baker T, Dingle A, Hansmeier T, Jimenez M, Lopez S, et al. Early Development and Reliability of the Timed Functional Arm and Shoulder Test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(6):420-31.
  • 10. Zhan S, Cerny FJ, Gibbons WJ, Mador MJ, Wu YW. Development of an unsupported arm exercise test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006;26(3):180-7; discussion 8-90.
  • 11. Janaudis-Ferreira T, Beauchamp MK, Goldstein RS, Brooks D. How should we measure arm exercise capacity in patients with COPD? A systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(1):111-20.
  • 12. Lima VP, Almeida FD, Janaudis-Ferreira T, Carmona B, Ribeiro-Samora GA, Velloso M. Reference values for the six-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy adults in Brazil. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia. 2018;44:190-4.
  • 13. Kulkarni MS, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, Ramakrishna A, Acharya V. Reference value for the six-minute peg board and ring test. A cross sectional study. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine. 2020;15(1).
  • 14. Calik-Kutukcu E, Tekerlek H, Bozdemir-Ozel C, Karaduz BN, Cakmak A, Inal-Ince D, et al. Validity and reliability of 6-minute pegboard and ring test in patients with asthma. J Asthma. 2022;59(7):1387-95.
  • 15. Kahraman BÖ, Özsoy İ, Tanriverdi A, Akdeniz B, Özpelit E, Şentürk B, et al. Validity and reliability of the 6-minute pegboard ring test in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2020;31(2):210-7.
  • 16. Felisberto RM, De Barros CF, Nucci KCA, De Albuquerque ALP, Paulin E, De Brito CMM, et al. Is the 6-minute pegboard and ring test valid to evaluate upper limb function in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD? International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2018:1663-73.
  • 17. Takeda K, Kawasaki Y, Yoshida K, Nishida Y, Harada T, Yamaguchi K, et al. The 6-minute pegboard and ring test is correlated with upper extremity activity of daily living in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2013:347-51.
  • 18. Leite HR, Queiroz IP, Santos JG, Barroso de Souza FL, Scheidt Figueiredo PH, de Cordoba Lanza F, et al. Measurement properties of the six-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adolescents. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;28:56-61.
  • 19. Ozsoy I, Ozcan Kahraman B, Ozsoy G, Ilcin N, Kahraman T, Acar S, et al. Determinants of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test as an unsupported upper-extremity exercise capacity measure in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9(6):863-70.
  • 20. Casadei K, Kiel J. Anthropometric Measurement. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL)2023.
  • 21. Daşkapan A, Kurtoğlu F, Kılıç F, Karakaş F, Özdemir F. The evaluation of physical activity levels in Turkish dialysis patients. 2018.
  • 22. Fix AJ DD. Human activity profile professional manual. . Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; 1998.
  • 23. Arzu Daşkapan BA, Metin Karataş, Didem Kumru Atalay. Evaluation of Physical Activity Level in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2011;14:75-9.
  • 24. Portney LG WM. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
  • 25. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
  • 26. Lima VP, Almeida FD, Janaudis-Ferreira T, Carmona B, Ribeiro-Samora GA, Velloso M. Reference values for the six-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy adults in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2018;44(3):190-4.
  • 27. Kulkarni MS, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, Ramakrishna A, Acharya V. Reference value for the six-minute peg board and ring test. A cross sectional study. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2020;15(1):670.
  • 28. Zullo A, Fleckenstein J, Schleip R, Hoppe K, Wearing S, Klingler W. Structural and Functional Changes in the Coupling of Fascial Tissue, Skeletal Muscle, and Nerves During Aging. Front Physiol. 2020;11:592.
  • 29. Ohara DG MC, Reis IM, Jamami M. . Functional capacity assessment of upper limbs in healthy young adult subjects. Fisioter Mov 2017;30:159-67.
  • 30. Fonseca AA, Scheidt Figueiredo PH, Costa HS, Costa Mota LT, Angelo de Deus F, Cardoso RF, et al. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic demand of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy young adults. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022;29:99-105.
  • 31. Seethamma KM JOR, Nithin Prakash, Kshama Shetty. Correlation of Forearm Circumference and Hand Length with Grip Strength in Healthy Young Adults. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 2019;2(10):10-5.
  • 32. Anakwe RE, Huntley JS, McEachan JE. Grip strength and forearm circumference in a healthy population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007;32(2):203-9.
  • 33. Takeda K, Kawasaki Y, Yoshida K, Nishida Y, Harada T, Yamaguchi K, et al. The 6-minute pegboard and ring test is correlated with upper extremity activity of daily living in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:347-51.

Reference values for the six-minute pegboard and ring test in young-middle aged healthy adults in Turkey

Year 2025, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 31.01.2025

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the reference values of the 6 Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT) unsupported arm function exercise test in young and middle-aged healthy adults in Turkey and to correlate the results with arm length, dominant side arm and forearm circumference and physical activity level.
Methods: Arm length, arm and forearm circumference, unsupported arm exercise capacity, physical activity level were evaluated.
Results: A total of 132 participants (mean age= 33.59 ± 11.65 years), 88 women and 44 men, participated in the study. There were moderate, oppositeand significant (r=-0.402; p<0.001), weakly oppositeand significant (r=-0.195; p=0.025), weakly opposite and significant (r=-0.205; p=0.018), weakly and significant (r=0.312; p<0.001), and moderately significant (r=0.552; p<0.001) associations between number of rings and age, weight, maximum activity score (MAS), and adjusted activity score (AAS). When the whole model was evaluated separately by gender and in general; the effective variables on the number of rings for female were age (B=-1.063; t=-2.794;p=0.007) and AAS (B=0.591; t=3.993; p<0.001).Variables affecting the number of rings for male; Dyspnea difference (B=-11,537; t=-4.135; p<0.001) and MAS (B=1.740; t=3.773; p=0.001).Variables affecting the number of rings regardless of gender are age (B=-0.987; t=-3.743; p<0.001) and HAPaas (B=0.649; t=6.515; p<0.001).
Conclusion: In this study, reference values for 6PBRT were determined in healthy young and middle-aged adults in Turkey. It was found that there was a correlation between 6PBRT results and age, weight, BMI and physical activity level.

References

  • 1. Velloso M, Stella SG, Cendon S, Silva AC, Jardim JR. Metabolic and ventilatory parameters of four activities of daily living accomplished with arms in COPD patients. Chest. 2003;123(4):1047-53.
  • 2. Meijer K, Annegarn J, Lima Passos V, Savelberg HH, Schols AM, Wouters EF, et al. Characteristics of daily arm activities in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(6):1631-41.
  • 3. Cakmak A, Kocaaga E, Sonbahar-Ulu H, Inal-Ince D, Vardar-Yagli N, Calik-Kutukcu E, et al. Upper Extremity Exercise Capacity and Activities of Daily Living in Individuals With Bronchiectasis Versus Healthy Controls. Phys Ther. 2023;103(4).
  • 4. Mackey M, Ellis E, Nicholls M. Breathing patterns and heart rate during simulated occupational upper limb tasks in normal subjects. Physiother Res Int. 1998;3(2):83-99.
  • 5. Kathiresan G, Jeyaraman SK, Jaganathan J. Effect of upper extremity exercise in people with COPD. J Thorac Dis. 2010;2(4):223-36.
  • 6. Lima VP, Iamonti VC, Velloso M, Janaudis-Ferreira T. Physiological Responses to Arm Activity in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Compared With Healthy Controls: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016;36(6):402-12.
  • 7. Takahashi T, Jenkins SC, Strauss GR, Watson CP, Lake FR. A new unsupported upper limb exercise test for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003;23(6):430-7.
  • 8. Hill CJ, Denehy L, Holland AE, McDonald CF. Measurement of functional activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the grocery shelving task. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(6):402-9.
  • 9. Shah KM, Baker T, Dingle A, Hansmeier T, Jimenez M, Lopez S, et al. Early Development and Reliability of the Timed Functional Arm and Shoulder Test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(6):420-31.
  • 10. Zhan S, Cerny FJ, Gibbons WJ, Mador MJ, Wu YW. Development of an unsupported arm exercise test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006;26(3):180-7; discussion 8-90.
  • 11. Janaudis-Ferreira T, Beauchamp MK, Goldstein RS, Brooks D. How should we measure arm exercise capacity in patients with COPD? A systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(1):111-20.
  • 12. Lima VP, Almeida FD, Janaudis-Ferreira T, Carmona B, Ribeiro-Samora GA, Velloso M. Reference values for the six-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy adults in Brazil. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia. 2018;44:190-4.
  • 13. Kulkarni MS, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, Ramakrishna A, Acharya V. Reference value for the six-minute peg board and ring test. A cross sectional study. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine. 2020;15(1).
  • 14. Calik-Kutukcu E, Tekerlek H, Bozdemir-Ozel C, Karaduz BN, Cakmak A, Inal-Ince D, et al. Validity and reliability of 6-minute pegboard and ring test in patients with asthma. J Asthma. 2022;59(7):1387-95.
  • 15. Kahraman BÖ, Özsoy İ, Tanriverdi A, Akdeniz B, Özpelit E, Şentürk B, et al. Validity and reliability of the 6-minute pegboard ring test in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2020;31(2):210-7.
  • 16. Felisberto RM, De Barros CF, Nucci KCA, De Albuquerque ALP, Paulin E, De Brito CMM, et al. Is the 6-minute pegboard and ring test valid to evaluate upper limb function in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD? International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2018:1663-73.
  • 17. Takeda K, Kawasaki Y, Yoshida K, Nishida Y, Harada T, Yamaguchi K, et al. The 6-minute pegboard and ring test is correlated with upper extremity activity of daily living in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2013:347-51.
  • 18. Leite HR, Queiroz IP, Santos JG, Barroso de Souza FL, Scheidt Figueiredo PH, de Cordoba Lanza F, et al. Measurement properties of the six-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adolescents. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;28:56-61.
  • 19. Ozsoy I, Ozcan Kahraman B, Ozsoy G, Ilcin N, Kahraman T, Acar S, et al. Determinants of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test as an unsupported upper-extremity exercise capacity measure in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9(6):863-70.
  • 20. Casadei K, Kiel J. Anthropometric Measurement. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL)2023.
  • 21. Daşkapan A, Kurtoğlu F, Kılıç F, Karakaş F, Özdemir F. The evaluation of physical activity levels in Turkish dialysis patients. 2018.
  • 22. Fix AJ DD. Human activity profile professional manual. . Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; 1998.
  • 23. Arzu Daşkapan BA, Metin Karataş, Didem Kumru Atalay. Evaluation of Physical Activity Level in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2011;14:75-9.
  • 24. Portney LG WM. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
  • 25. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
  • 26. Lima VP, Almeida FD, Janaudis-Ferreira T, Carmona B, Ribeiro-Samora GA, Velloso M. Reference values for the six-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy adults in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2018;44(3):190-4.
  • 27. Kulkarni MS, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, Ramakrishna A, Acharya V. Reference value for the six-minute peg board and ring test. A cross sectional study. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2020;15(1):670.
  • 28. Zullo A, Fleckenstein J, Schleip R, Hoppe K, Wearing S, Klingler W. Structural and Functional Changes in the Coupling of Fascial Tissue, Skeletal Muscle, and Nerves During Aging. Front Physiol. 2020;11:592.
  • 29. Ohara DG MC, Reis IM, Jamami M. . Functional capacity assessment of upper limbs in healthy young adult subjects. Fisioter Mov 2017;30:159-67.
  • 30. Fonseca AA, Scheidt Figueiredo PH, Costa HS, Costa Mota LT, Angelo de Deus F, Cardoso RF, et al. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic demand of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy young adults. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022;29:99-105.
  • 31. Seethamma KM JOR, Nithin Prakash, Kshama Shetty. Correlation of Forearm Circumference and Hand Length with Grip Strength in Healthy Young Adults. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 2019;2(10):10-5.
  • 32. Anakwe RE, Huntley JS, McEachan JE. Grip strength and forearm circumference in a healthy population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007;32(2):203-9.
  • 33. Takeda K, Kawasaki Y, Yoshida K, Nishida Y, Harada T, Yamaguchi K, et al. The 6-minute pegboard and ring test is correlated with upper extremity activity of daily living in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:347-51.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Physiotherapy
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Hacer Öncü 0000-0001-8677-0302

Ebru Çalık Kütükcü 0000-0001-5215-5125

Ulaş Ar 0000-0001-6598-4184

Nurel Ertürk 0000-0002-9910-6336

Ayşe Akdal 0000-0002-5051-8807

Şeyma Bülbül 0000-0002-2087-304X

Ferhat Ünal 0000-0002-8314-6181

Publication Date January 31, 2025
Submission Date December 24, 2024
Acceptance Date January 20, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

Vancouver Öncü H, Çalık Kütükcü E, Ar U, Ertürk N, Akdal A, Bülbül Ş, Ünal F. Reference values for the six-minute pegboard and ring test in young-middle aged healthy adults in Turkey. JHUPTR. 2025;3(1):1-8.