Research Article

How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study

Volume: 9 Number: 1 April 30, 2022
EN

How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors underlying the fear of falling in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients and to determine the share of physical and psychological components in this fear.
Materials and Methods: Patients between the ages of 18-65 years, diagnosed with Relapsing-Remitting form of MS were included in the study. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) was used to assess gait functions and balance skills of patients during gait, Berg Balance Test (BBT) to assess balance skills in general, Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) to assess fear of falling, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) to assess MS severity of the patients.
Results: Forty-four patients (F:32 M:12) diagnosed with MS, with a mean age of 37.23±9.67 years, were included in our study. There was a statistically significant, positive and moderate correlation between the fear of falling and the number of attacks in the last 1 year (r=0.433, p=0.039), a statistically significant, positive and high-level correlation between fear of falling and falling history in the last 1 year (r=0.912, p=0.001), disability status (r=0.940, p=0.001) and TUG test (r=0.901, p=0.001) and a significant, negative and high-level correlation between fear of falling and balance skills (r=-0.944, p=0.001). According to the regression analysis, while the effects of falling history (p=0.043), BBT (p=0.025), TUG (p=0.004), and EDSS (p=0.007) on FES-1 were significant, the effect of TPLA was insignificant (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Patients with MS are right about their fear of falling in parallel with their disability and balance-gait skills. However, this relationship is bidirectional, and the fear of falling has the potential to increase these limitations even more in MS patients whose functional activities are already restricted or going to be restricted.

Keywords

Thanks

As the authors, we would like to thank Prof. Dr. Caner Feyzi DEMİR for his important contributions to our study.

References

  1. Ascherio, A. (2013). Environmental factors in multiple sclerosis. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 13(sup2), 3-9. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2013.865866
  2. Berg, K., Wood-Dauphinee, S., & Williams, J. I. (1995). The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 27(1), 27-36.
  3. Bernhard, F. P., Sartor, J., Bettecken, K., Hobert, M. A., Arnold, C., Weber, Y. G., et al. (2018). Wearables for gait and balance assessment in the neurological ward-study design and first results of a prospective cross-sectional feasibility study with 384 inpatients. BMC Neurology, 18(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1111-7
  4. Browne, P., Chandraratna, D., Angood, C., Tremlett, H., Baker, C., Taylor, B. V., & Thompson, A. J. (2014). Atlas of multiple sclerosis 2013: a growing global problem with widespread inequity. Neurology, 83(11), 1022-1024. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000768
  5. Cameron, M. H., & Nilsagard, Y. (2018). Balance, gait, and falls in multiple sclerosis. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 159, 237-250. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63916-5.00015-X
  6. Comber, L., Galvin, R., & Coote, S. (2017). Gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait & Posture, 51, 25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.026
  7. Delbaere, K., Close, J. C., Mikolaizak, A. S., Sachdev, P. S., Brodaty, H., & Lord, S. R. (2010). The falls efficacy scale international (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age and Ageing, 39(2), 210-216. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp225
  8. Hafler, D. A. (2004). More MS news articles for April 2004. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 113, 788-794.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 30, 2022

Submission Date

September 27, 2021

Acceptance Date

February 2, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 9 Number: 1

APA
Tekin, F., & Bilek, F. (2022). How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 9(1), 236-247. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1001761
AMA
1.Tekin F, Bilek F. How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study. HUFHSJ. 2022;9(1):236-247. doi:10.21020/husbfd.1001761
Chicago
Tekin, Fatih, and Furkan Bilek. 2022. “How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 9 (1): 236-47. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1001761.
EndNote
Tekin F, Bilek F (April 1, 2022) How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 9 1 236–247.
IEEE
[1]F. Tekin and F. Bilek, “How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study”, HUFHSJ, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 236–247, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.21020/husbfd.1001761.
ISNAD
Tekin, Fatih - Bilek, Furkan. “How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 9/1 (April 1, 2022): 236-247. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1001761.
JAMA
1.Tekin F, Bilek F. How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study. HUFHSJ. 2022;9:236–247.
MLA
Tekin, Fatih, and Furkan Bilek. “How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2022, pp. 236-47, doi:10.21020/husbfd.1001761.
Vancouver
1.Fatih Tekin, Furkan Bilek. How Right Are Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Fear of Falling? A Comparative Study. HUFHSJ. 2022 Apr. 1;9(1):236-47. doi:10.21020/husbfd.1001761