Research Article

Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals

Volume: 11 Number: 2 August 2, 2024
EN

Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the Q angle in individuals with hallux valgus (HV) and healthy individuals and to explore the correlation between HV and Q angle. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 15 individuals with HV (HV group-mean age: 41.60 ± 18.66 years) and 15 healthy individuals without HV with similar characteristics (Control group-mean age: 39.80 ± 8.59 years) participated. Hallux valgus angle (HVA) and Q angle were measured with a universal goniometer while demographic information was recorded. Results: No significant difference was found between the Q angle values on both the right and left sides in the HV group and the control group (p=0.056, Effect Size (ES)=0.730; p=0.376, ES=0.331, respectively). A weak positive correlation was found between the right-sided HV and right-sided Q angles of the study participants (r=0.446, p=0.013). When the relationship was analyzed according to the groups, a moderate positive correlation was found between right-sided HV and right-sided Q angles in the control group (r=0.533, p=0.041). Conclusion: There is a relationship, albeit weak, between HVA and Q angle in individuals with HV and healthy individuals. HVA should be taken into consideration when evaluating lower extremity alignment.

Keywords

References

  1. Aglietti, P., Insall, J. N., & Cerulli, G. (1983). Patellar pain and incongruence. I: Measurements of incongruence. Clin Orthop Relat Res (176), 217-224. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6851329
  2. Caylor, D., Fites, R., & Worrell, T. W. (1993). The Relationship between Quadriceps Angle and Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 17(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/DOI 10.2519/jospt.1993.17.1.11
  3. Condon, F., Kaliszer, M., Conhyea, D., T, O. D., Shaju, A., & Masterson, E. (2002). The first intermetatarsal angle in hallux valgus: an analysis of measurement reliability and the error involved. Foot Ankle Int, 23(8), 717-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070202300807
  4. Coughlin, M. J. (1995). Roger A. Mann Award. Juvenile hallux valgus: etiology and treatment. Foot Ankle Int, 16(11), 682-697. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079501601104
  5. Coughlin, M. J., & Freund, E. (2001). Roger A. Mann Award. The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities. Foot Ankle Int, 22(5), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070102200503
  6. Coughlin, M. J., & Jones, C. P. (2007). Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int, 28(7), 759-777. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0759
  7. Fournier, M., Saxena, A., & Maffulli, N. (2019). Hallux Valgus Surgery in the Athlete: Current Evidence. J Foot Ankle Surg, 58(4), 641-643. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.04.003
  8. Gaston, M. S., Rutz, E., Dreher, T., & Brunner, R. (2011). Transverse plane rotation of the foot and transverse hip and pelvic kinematics in diplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture, 34(2), 218-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.001

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

July 29, 2024

Publication Date

August 2, 2024

Submission Date

January 23, 2024

Acceptance Date

March 15, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 11 Number: 2

APA
Yılmaz, K., & Yurttaş, A. N. (2024). Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 11(2), 577-587. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1424616
AMA
1.Yılmaz K, Yurttaş AN. Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals. HUFHSJ. 2024;11(2):577-587. doi:10.21020/husbfd.1424616
Chicago
Yılmaz, Kamil, and Ayşe Nihal Yurttaş. 2024. “Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 11 (2): 577-87. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1424616.
EndNote
Yılmaz K, Yurttaş AN (August 1, 2024) Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 11 2 577–587.
IEEE
[1]K. Yılmaz and A. N. Yurttaş, “Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals”, HUFHSJ, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 577–587, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.21020/husbfd.1424616.
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Kamil - Yurttaş, Ayşe Nihal. “Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 11/2 (August 1, 2024): 577-587. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1424616.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz K, Yurttaş AN. Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals. HUFHSJ. 2024;11:577–587.
MLA
Yılmaz, Kamil, and Ayşe Nihal Yurttaş. “Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, Aug. 2024, pp. 577-8, doi:10.21020/husbfd.1424616.
Vancouver
1.Kamil Yılmaz, Ayşe Nihal Yurttaş. Comparison of Q Angle in Hallux Valgus and Healthy Individuals. HUFHSJ. 2024 Aug. 1;11(2):577-8. doi:10.21020/husbfd.1424616