The Role of Parentification in Childhood in Individuals' Life Satisfaction

Abstract

Objectives: Life satisfaction is an important factor influencing individuals' overall happiness, and one of the elements shaping this condition is the level of parentification experienced during childhood. This study aims to determine the impact of being a parentified child on individuals' levels of life satisfaction. Materials and Methods: The research was conducted with 227 participants aged between 15 and 65 years. Data were collected using the Life Satisfaction Scale and the Parentified Child Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and CHAID analysis were utilized in the data analysis. Results: In conclusion, this study reveals that the main factors affecting individuals' life satisfaction are economic status and the adequacy of physical and emotional conditions. It was observed that participants with lower economic status had significantly lower life satisfaction scores. Additionally, crowded family environments and negative experiences during childhood were found to have a negative impact on life satisfaction. Furthermore, it was observed that the youngest children scored lower on both the parentification scale and the sibling-focused parentification scale, indicating that birth order plays a significant role in family relationships and parenting dynamics. Conclusion: These findings underscore the critical factors that should be considered to understand the impact of family structure, economic conditions, and childhood experiences on individuals' social relationships and developmental processes.

Keywords

• parentified child
• effects of parentification
• life satisfaction

Bireylerin Yaşam Doyumunda Çocuklukta Ebeveynleştirmenin Rolü

Abstract

Amaç: Yaşam doyumu, bireylerin genel mutluluğunu etkileyen önemli bir faktördür ve bu durumu şekillendiren unsurlardan biri, bireylerin çocukluk dönemlerinde yaşadıkları ebeveynleştirme düzeyidir. Bu çalışmada, bireylerin yaşam doyumu düzeylerine ebeveynleştirilmiş çocuk olma durumunun etkisini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, yaşları 15 ile 65 arasında değişen 227 katılımcıyla yürütülmüştür. Veriler Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği ve Ebeveynleştirilmiş Çocuk Ölçeği kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde betimsel istatistikler, pearson korelasyon ve CHAID analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Bulgular: Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, bireylerin yaşam doyumunu etkileyen başlıca faktörlerin ekonomik durum ve fiziksel-duygusal alanların yeterliliği olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ekonomik durumu düşük olan katılımcıların yaşam doyumu puanlarının belirgin şekilde daha düşük olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca, kalabalık aile ortamı ve çocukluk döneminde yaşanan olumsuz deneyimlerin yaşam doyumunu olumsuz etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, son doğan çocukların ebeveynleştirilme ölçeği ve kardeş odaklı ebeveynleşme ölçeği puanlarının daha düşük olduğu görülmüştür, bu durumun doğum sırasının aile içindeki ilişkilerde ve ebeveynlik dinamiklerinde önemli bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Sonuç: Bu bulgular, aile yapısının, ekonomik koşulların ve çocukluk deneyimlerinin bireylerin sosyal ilişkileri ve gelişimsel süreçleri üzerindeki etkilerini anlamak için dikkate alınması gereken kritik unsurlar olduğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Keywords

• ebeveynleştirilmiş çocuk
• ebeveynleştirmenin etkileri
• yaşam doyumu

References

1. Adisa, T. A., Aiyenitaju, O., & Adekoya, O. D. (2021). The work–family balance of British working women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwam-07-2020-0036
2. Bayar, Ö., & Doğan, T. (2023). Childhood psychological resilience factors in young adults with adverse childhood experiences: A qualitative preliminary study. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 15(Supplement 1), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1292636
3. Barnett, B., & Parker, G. (1998). The parentified child: Early competence or childhood deprivation?. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 3(4), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360641798001695
4. Belen, H., Yildirim, M., ve Belen, F.S. (2020). Mutluluk korkusunun gelişme üzerindeki etkisi: Umut ajansının ve umut yollarının aracı rolleri. Avustralya Psikoloji Dergisi , 72 (2), 165-173.
5. Błażek, M. (2016). Parental attitudes and parentification of children in families with limited parental care competencies. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(3), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjap-2015-0064
6. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. (1973). Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational. Harper & Row. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. Basic Books.
7. Buhl, H. M. (2008). Significance of individuation in adult child-parent relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 29(2), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07304272
8. Burton, L. (2007). Childhood adultification in economically disadvantaged families: Aconceptual model. Family Relations, 56(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x

9. Burton, S., Hooper, L. M., Tomek, S., Cauley, B., Washington, A., & Possel, P. (2018). The mediating effects of parentification on the relation between parenting behavior and well-being and depressive symptoms in early adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(12), 4044–4059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1215-0
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (24. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
11. Byng‐Hall, J. (2008). The significance of children fulfilling parental roles: Implications for family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 30(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00423.x
12. Castro, D. M., Jones, R. A., & Mirsalimi, H. (2004). Parentification and the impostor phenomenon: An empirical investigation. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 32 (3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072518814308
13. Cho, A. R., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). Exploring effects of childhood parentification on adultdepressive symptoms in Korean college students. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75 (4), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22737
14. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
15. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Investigação qualitativa e projeto de pesquisa : Escolhendo entre cinco abordagens. Penso Editora.
16. Crittenden, P. M. (2006). A dynamic‐maturational model of attachment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 27(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608305X57978
17. Dağlı, A., & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin türkçe’ye uyarlanmasi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), 1250-1262. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.263229
18. DiCaccavo, A. (2006). Working with parentification: Implications for clients and counselling psychologists. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 79(3), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608305X57978
19. Diener, E. D. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
20. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., and Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
21. Diener, E. (1999). Introduction to the special section on the structure of emotion. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 803-804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.803
22. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological science in the public interest, 5(1), 1-31.
23. Earley, L., & Cushway, D. (2002). The parentified child. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104502007002005
24. Eskisu, M. (2021). The role of proactive personality in the relationship among parentification, psychological resilience and psychological well-being. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(2), 797-813.
25. Ersöz, A. (2019). Gender roles and family dynamics in Turkey: A sociological perspective. Turkish Journal of Sociology, 35(2), 210-225.
26. George, C., & Solomon, J. (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. Guilford
27. Gilford, T. T., & Reynolds, A. (2011). “My mother’s keeper”: The effects of parentification on black female college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 37(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798410372624
28. Goldthorpe, J., Epton, T., Keyworth, C., Calam, R., & Armitage, C. (2019). Who is responsible for keeping children healthy? A qualitative exploration of the views of children aged 8–10 years old. BMJ Open, 9(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025245
29. M. Gopfert, J. Webster, and M. V. Seeman (Eds) (2004). Parental psychiatric disorder: Distressed parents and their families (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
30. Gopfert, M. (2006). Cognitive-analytic therapy and parents in prison. In P. H. Pollock, M. Stowell-Smith, & M. Gopfert (Eds.), Cognitive-analytic therapy for offenders. Routledge.
31. Gromada, A., Richardson, D., & Rees, G. (2020). Childcare in a global crisis: The impact of COVID-19 on work and family life. In Innocenti Research Brief (Issue Covid-19 & Children).
32. Gutman, L. M., & Feinstein, L. (2010). Parenting behaviours and children’s development from infancy to early childhood: Changes, continuities and contributions. Early Child Development and Care, 180(4), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430802113042
33. Hetherington, E. M. (1999). Should we stay together for the sake of the children? In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Coping with divorce, single parenting, and remarriage: A risk and resiliency perspective (pp. 93–116). Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Hilton, I. (1967). Annelerin ilk ve sonraki doğan çocuklarına karşı davranışlarındaki farklılıklar. Kişilik ve Sosyal Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(3, Pt.1), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025074
35. Hooper, L. (2007). Expanding the discussion regarding parentification and its varied outcomes: Implications for mental health research and practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 29(4), 322-337. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.29.4.48511m0tk22054j5
36. Hotz, V. J., & Pantano, J. (2015). The effects of the early life environment on educational outcomes: Evidence from the U.S. The Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 631-672. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.3.631
37. Jurkovic, G. J. (1998). Destructive parentification in families: Causes and consequences. In L. L'Abate (Ed.), Family psychopathology: The relational doots of dyfunctional behavior (pp. 237–255). Guilford Press.
38. Jurkovic, G. J. (1997). Lost childhoods: The plight of the parentified child. Brunner/Mazel
39. Johnson, B. E., & Ray, W. A. (2016). Family systems theory. In C. L. Shehan (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of family studies (Vol. 2, pp. 782–787). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs130
40. Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for theory and practice. Human Development, 48(4), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959
41. Kerig, P. K. (2005). Revisiting the construct of boundary dissolution: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 5(2-3), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v05n02_02
42. Keser, A. (2005). İş doyumu ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisi: Otomotiv sektöründe bir uygulama. Çalışma ve Toplum, 4(7), 77-96.
43. Kılıç, S. (2013). Örnekleme yöntemleri. Journal of Mood Disorders, 3(1), 44-6. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20130325011730
44. Lafortune, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Intergenerational mobility and the role of educational attainment in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.1.91
45. Luthar, S. S., & Zelazo, L. B. (2003). Research on resilience: An integrative review. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 510–549). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615788.023
46. Maccoby, E. E. (2000). Parenting and its effects on children: On reading and misreading behavior genetics. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.1
47. Mahler, M. S. (1971). A study of the separation-individuation process and its possible application to borderline phenomena in the psychoanalytic situation. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 26, 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1971.11822279
48. Mechoulan, S., & Wolff, F. (2015). How do parents' employment decisions affect children's educational outcomes? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(4), 709-725. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00531
49. Md-Yunus, S. (2005). Childcare practices in three Asian countries. Faculty Research and Creative Activity, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165831
50. Milanović, M., & Stamenković, M. (2016). CHAID decision tree: Methodological frame and application. Economic Themes, 54(4), 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2016-0029
51. Parker, S., Greer, S., & Zuckerman, B. (1988). Double jeopardy: The impact of poverty on early child development. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 35(6), 1227-1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(16)36580-4
52. Połomski, P., Peplińska, A., Lewandowska-Walter, A., & Borchet, J. (2021). Exploring resiliency and parentification in Polish adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11454. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111454
53. Rana, R., & Das, A. (2021). Parentification: A review paper. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 9(1), 2349–3429. https://doi.org/10.25215/0901.006
54. Saha, A. (2016). Parentification: Boon or bane?. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 11(2), 289-301.
55. Schleider, J. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2017). Little treatments, promising effects? Meta-analysis of single-session interventions for youth psychiatric problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(2), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.11.007
56. Seid, S., & Gurmu, E. (2015). Family structure and ıts effects on educational outcomes: evidence from Ethiopia. Development Policy Review, 33(6), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12161
57. Stein, J. A., Rotheram-borusz, M., & Lester, P. (2007). Impact of parentification on longterm outcomes among children of parents with HIV/AIDS. Family Process, 46(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00214.x
58. Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. Pantheon Books.
59. Teng, J. C. C., Hilario, Angela Dionne F. Sauler, L. M. A., Reyes, M. C. M. D. L., & Arcinas, M. M. (2021). Parentification experiences of filipino young professional daughters during the COVID-19. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 3(4), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.
60. Tomeny, T. S., Barry, T. D., ve Fair, E. C. (2017). Parentification of adult siblings of individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Distress, sibling relationship attitudes, and the role of social support. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 42(4), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1248376
61. Tuzgöl Dost, M. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam doyumunun bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 132-143.
62. Wang, M., Liu, S., & Belsky, J. (2017). Triangulation processes experienced by children in contemporary China. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(6), 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416662345
63. Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. International Journal of psychoanalysis, 41(6), 585-595.
64. Yeung, W. J. J., Desai, S., & Jones, G. W. (2018). Families in Southeast and South Asia. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(May), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevsoc-073117-041124
65. Yew, W. P., Siau, C. S., & Kwong, S. F. (2017). Parentification and resilience among students with clinical and nonclinical aspirations: A cross-sectional quantitative study. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 45(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12063
66. Yıldırım, M., Arslan, G. ve Ahmad Aziz, I. (2020). COVID-19 endişesi yüksek olan kişilerde neden daha fazla ruhsal sağlık sorunu görülüyor? Dayanıklılık ve yaşamda anlamın rolleri. Danubina Psikiyatrisi , 32 (3-4), 505-512.
67. Żarczyńska-Hyla, ´ J., Zdaniuk, B., Piechnik-Borusowska, J., & Kromolicka, B. (2019). Parentification in the experience of Polish adolescents. The role of sociodemographic factors and emotional consequences for parentified youth. New Educational Review, 55(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2019.55.1.11
68. Zencir, T., & Haskan-Avcı, Ö. (2019). Development of the parentified child scale-adult version: A reliability and validity study. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(1), 531-553. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.443707