Patients With Cystic Echinococcosis Suspected Applicant Laboratory between 2005-2012 Anti-Echinococcus IgG IFA Seropositivity Designated Assessment Method

Abstract

Background: Cystic Echinococcosis is a significant health problem seen in our country and region, as well. Purpose: The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the anti-Echinococcus IgG seropositivity rates of the patients retrospectively who admitted to Dicle University, Department of Medical Microbiology Laboratory between January 2005 and June 2012 with the diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis. Method: The serum samples of 1612 patients 901 of whom were females and 711 males, sent to variety of clinics and polyclinics with the suspicion of cystic echinococcosis were studied. Indirect fluorescent antibody method was used in determining Echinococcus IgG antibodies (IFA). Results: The anti-Echinococcus IgG seropositivity was found to be 41.0% (662) in 1612 cases. 23.8% of seropositive patients were children and 76.1% of them were adults. Furthermore, seropositivity was detected in 43.3% of 901 females and 38.1% 711 of the males. Conclusion: The serological test can be implemented to support the radiological diagnosis of KE, to determine asymptomatic cyst carriers, the prevalence of disease in the community and, if there is to demonstrate the effectiveness of the control program. On the other hand, echinococcosis continues to be a common public health problem in our province.

Keywords

• Cystic Echinococcosis, anti-Echinococcus IgG seropositivity, rate

References

1. Altıntaş N, Yazar S, Yolasığmaz A, Akısu C, Şakru N, Karacasu F, et al. A serum epidemiological study of cystic echinocococcosis in İzmir and its surrounding area. Turkey Helminthologia 1999; 36: 19 - 23. 2. Özbilgin A, Kilimcioğlu AA.Kistik Echinococcosis. Özcel MA, Özbel Y, Ak M, editors. Özcel’in Tıbbi Parazit Hastalıkları. İzmir: Meta basım;2007. 541-66. 3. Şenlik B. Echinococcosis. Altıntaş N, Tınar R, Çoker A, Edi. Hidatidoloji Derneği No: 1, 2004;31-37.
2. Gottstein B. Molecular and immunological diagnosis of echinococcosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 1992; 5: 248-61. 5. Yazar S, Altıntaş N. Serodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis in Turkey. Helminthologia 2003; 40: 9-13.
3. Çetinkaya Z, Ciftci IH, Demirel R, Altındiş M, Ayaz E. A sero-epidemiologic study on cystic
4. echinococcosis in Midwestern region of Turkey. Saudi Med J 2005; 26: 350-1.
5. Kilimcioğlu AA, Ozkol M, Bayindir P, Girginkardeşler N, Ostan I, Ok UZ. The value of
6. ultrasonography alone in screening surveys of cystic echinococcosis in children in Turkey. Parasitol Int 2006; 55: 273-5.
7. Aydın M, Adıyaman G, Doğruman-Al F, Kuştimur S, Ozkan S.Determination of anti-echinococcus IgG
8. antibodies by ELISA in patients with suspected hydatid cyst.Türkiye Parazitol Derg. 2012;36(2):61-4.

9. Bakal U, Kazez A, Akyol M, Kocakoc E, Simsek S.A portable ultrasound based screening study on the
10. prevalence and risk factors of cystic echinococcosis in primary school children in East Turkey.Acta Trop. 2012; 123(2):91-5.
11. Cetinkaya U, Hamamcı B, Kaya M, Gücüyetmez S, Kuk S, Yazar S, Sahin I.Investigation of Anti
12. Echinococcus granulosus Antibodies in Patients with Suspected Cystic Echinococcosis.Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2012;36(2):57-60.
13. Karaman U, Miman O, Kara M, Gıcık Y, Aycan MO, Atambay M. Hydatid cyst prevalence in the
14. region of Kars. Turkiye Parazitol Derg, 2005; 29: 238-40.
15. Sönmez Tamer G. Toxoplasmosisandthe incidence ofCysticEchinococcosis in Kocaeli ,Turkey.Turkiye
16. Parazitoloji Dergisi, 2009; 33 (2): 125 – 130.
17. Canda MŞ,. Echinococcosis:Reportof 47 cases andEchinococcosisdiagnosis ofthe problemin Turkey.Turkiye
18. Parazitol Derg, 1995;19: 64 -82.
19. Ertabaklar H, Pektaş B, Turgay N, Yolasığmaz A, Dayangaç M, Özdamar A, Karaca İ, Olgaç G, Dağcı
20. H, Göksel T, Menteş A, Çoker A, Altıntaş N, 2003. Hospitalsin aroundand in Izmir’January 1997-May 2001between thedetectedCysticEchinococcosisCases.Turkiye Parazitol Derg, 27 (2): 125-128.
21. Tevfik M, Aldemir OS, Karadaş K, Çelik T, Daldal N,.UnilocularcysticechinococcosisinMalatya.Türkiye
22. Parazitol Derg, 2000;24 (1): 33-36.
23. Biava MF, Dao A, Fortier B. Laboratory diagnosis of cystic hydatic disease. World J Surg, 2001;25(1):10-4.
24. Sari C, Ertuğ S, Karadam SY, Ozgun H, Karaoğlu AO, Ertabaklar H. The comparative evaluation of
25. Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), Indirect Hemagglutination Test (IHA) and Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT) in the diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2009; 33: 73-6.
26. Akpolat N, Gedik Ercan.The Importance of Indirect Fluoresan Antibody Test in the Diagnosis of Cystic
27. Echinococcosis.Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2009;29(6):1594-7.