Risk and Return Characteristics of Islamic Indices: An Empirical Approach
Abstract
The main purpose of this research is to demonstrate the risk and return characteristics of Islamic indices. Islamic indices calculated by DJ and MSCI in the case of Turkey, Malaysia, USA, and the UK are examined in the widest time range. Respective conventional benchmark indices have also been included in the analysis to evaluate the empirical findings in a comparative manner. In the empirical research in which the mean-variance analysis framework is adopted, single and multi-factor asset pricing models are also applied together with ratio analysis. According to the empirical findings, there are noticeable differences between the risk and return characteristics of Islamic indices and their conventional counterparts depending on the country, index type and time period studied. Islamic indices tend to perform better and to have a lower level of systematic risk than their conventional counterparts. However, most of these findings and tests are not statistically significant. Therefore, in technical terms, this study concludes that there is no significant difference between the risk and return characteristics of Islamic indices and conventional counterparts. Some evidence has been found supporting the widely asserted claim that Islamic indices do not have an optimal risk-return profile by opponent researchers. However, when the absolute and risk-adjusted returns and alpha coefficients provided by Islamic indices are taken into account it appears that Islamic indices do not perform poorly than their conventional counterparts. In other words, it can be said that Islamic index investors do not bear extra costs in the examined cases.
Keywords
References
- Alam, N., & Rajjaque, M. S. (2010). Shariah-compliant equities: Empirical evaluation of performance in the European market during credit crunch. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 15(3), 228–240.
- Al-Khazali, O., Lean, H. H., & Samet, A. (2014). Do Islamic stock indexes outperform conventional stock indexes?: A stochastic dominance approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 28:29–46.
- Ashraf, D. (2016). Does Shari’ah screening cause abnormal returns?: Empirical evidence from Islamic equity indices. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 209–228.
- Ashraf, D., & Mohammad, N. (2014). Matching perception with the reality?: Performance of Islamic equity investments. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 28, 175–189.
- Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Rad, A. T. (2006). Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14(1), 33–48.
- BinMahfouz, S. S. (2012). Investment characteristics of Islamic investment portfolios: Evidence from Saudi mutual funds and global indices. Ph.D. Dissertation, Durham University. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4440/
- BinMahfouz, S., & Hassan, M. K. (2013). Sustainable and socially responsible investing: Does Islamic investing make a difference? Humanomics, 29(3), 164–186.
- Boujelbène Abbes, M. (2012). Risk and return of Islamic and conventional indices. International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, 5(1), 1–23.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Mevlut Camgoz
*
This is me
0000-0001-7106-3293
Türkiye
K. Ahmet Kose
This is me
0000-0002-4651-8839
Türkiye
Belkıs Seval
0000-0002-2212-2354
Türkiye
Publication Date
March 27, 2019
Submission Date
April 19, 2018
Acceptance Date
February 12, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2018 Volume: 47 Number: 2