Evaluation and Classification of Behavioral Biases According to Thinking Styles, Risky Investment Intention, and Subjective Financial Literacy

Year 2023, , 133 - 160, 30.05.2023

Selim Aren , Hatice Nayman Hamamcı

https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2023.52.961368

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to classify the 20 biases into different groups (factors) and estimate each of them according to the variables of rational, experiential-affective, risky investment intention, and financial literacy. Behavioral finance, which combines the concepts and approaches of psychology with the theory of finance, evaluates individuals’ deviations from rational choices in their financial decisions with the concept of biases. In this context, the data were collected from 1188 subjects in Turkey through online surveys using a convenience sampling method between 14 May - 28 June 2020. Participants were gender-balanced, young, single, and highly educated. An exploratory factor analysis, ANOVA, an independent sample T-test, and a correlation analysis were performed using SPSS. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed using structural equation modeling. According to the results, these 20 biases were grouped into four groups according to the variables of thinking style, risky investment intention, and subjective financial literacy level. It was determined how both these four groups and individual biases differ according to thinking styles, risky investment intention and their levels of subjective financial literacy. In addition, it was also investigated whether both bias groups and other variables differed according to four demographic variables.

Keywords

Behavioral Biases, Thinking Styles, Risky Investment Intention, Subjective Financial Literacy

References

• Adamkovic, M., Martoncik, M., & Ropovik, I. (2020). The effect of economic situation on time and risk preferences: Does financial literacy matter?. Created: December 31, 2018 | Last edited: January 07, 2020. https://psyarxiv.com/5vaud 19.02.2021 google scholar
• Al-Dahana N.S.H., Hasan M.F., & Jadah H.M. (2019). Effect of Cognitive and Emotional Biases on Investor Decisions: An Analytical Study of the Iraq Stock Exchange. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9 (10), 30-47. google scholar
• Anwar, M., Khan, S.Z., & Rehman, A.U. (2017). Financial Literacy, Behavioral Biases and Investor’s Portfolio Diversification: Empirical Study of an Emerging Stock Market. Journal of Finance & Economics Research, 2(2), 144-163. google scholar
• Aren, S. (2019a). Evaluation of Psychological Biases in the Financial Framework. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 1 - 25. google scholar
• Aren, S. (2019b). Theoretical Evaluation Of Psychological Biases In Behavioral Finance. The Journal of Business Economics and Management Research, 2(2), 127-160. google scholar
• Aren, S., & Canikli, S. (2018a). Typology of Behavioral Biases and Heuristics. 14TH International Strategic Management Conference July 12-14, 2018 Prague-Czechia, 557-562, The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS Vol:54, 2019, pp. 290-296. google scholar
• Aren, S., & Canikli, S. (2018b). The effect of financial literacy and risk perception on investment choices of individual investors. 8th International Conference On Leadership, Technology, Innovation And Business Management, July 12-14, Prague-Czechia, pp. 143-149. google scholar
• Aren, S. & Hamamcı, H.N. (2020). Relationship between risk aversion, risky investment intention,investment choices: impact of personality traits and emotion. Kybernetes, 49(11), 2651-2682. DOI:10.1108/K-07-2019-0455. google scholar
• Aren, S., Nayman, H.H., & Özcan, S. (2021). Moderation Effect of Pleasure Seeking and Loss Aversion in The Relationshıp Between Personality Traits and Risky Investment Intention. Kybernetes. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1108/K-05-2020-0278 google scholar
• Aren, S. & Hamamcı, H.N. (2021). Risk-taking and risk aversion in the period of before and after the 2008 crisis: evaluation with bibliometric analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Vol. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1-16. DOI: 10.1108/JEAS-03-2021-0047 google scholar
• Ateş, S., Coşkun, A., Şahin, M.A., & Demircan, M.L. (2016). Impact of Financial Literacy on the Behavioral Biases of Individual Stock Investors: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(3), 1-19. google scholar
• Avşar, Y., & Özdemir, O. (2020). A Research on the Effects of Textual Presentation Order in Annual Reports on Non-Professional Investors’ Decisions. Journal of Selçuk University Social Sciences Vocational School, 23(1), 257-286. google scholar
• Ayadi, N., Paraschiv, C., & Vernette, E. (2017). Increasing Consumer Well-Being: Risk As Potential Driver of Happiness. Applied Economics, 49(43), 4321-4335. google scholar
• Aydemir, S.D., & Aren, S. (2017). Do the effects of individual factors on financial risk-taking behavior diversify with financial literacy?. Kybernetes, 46(10), 1706-1734. google scholar
• Baker, H.K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N., & Gaur, V. (2019). How financial literacy anddemographic variables relate tobehavioral biases. Managerial Finance, 45(1), 124-146. google scholar
• Baker, H.K., & Ricciardi, V. (2014). How Biases Affect Investor Behaviour. The European Financial Review, February-March, 7-10. google scholar
• Baker, K.H. (2019). The Psychology of Financial Professionals and Their Clients. Investment and Wealth Monitor, Sep/October, 15-20. google scholar
• Barron, G., & Yechiam, E. (2009). The coexistence of overestimation and underweighting of rare events and the contingent recency effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), 447-460. google scholar
• Baumeister, R.F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 670-676. google scholar
• Beasley, R. (2016). Dissonance and decision-making mistakes in the age of risk. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 771-787. google scholar
• Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. (2016). Biases and Heuristics in Decision Making and Their Impact on Autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(5), 5-15. google scholar
• Bommier, A., & Rochet, J. C. (2006). Risk aversion and planning horizons. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(4), 708-734 google scholar
• Borghans, L., Golsteyn, B.H.H., Heckman, J.J., & Meijers, H. (2009). Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion, Journal of the European Economic Association. MIT Press, 7(2-3), 649-658. google scholar
• Boyle, P. A., Yu, L., Buchman, A. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2012). Risk aversion is associated with decision making among community-based older persons. Frontiers in psychology, 3. google scholar
• Breuer, W., Riesener, M. & Salzmann, A.J. (2014). Risk aversion vs. individualism: what drives risktaking in household finance?. The European Journal of Finance, 20(5), 446-462. DOI:10.1080/135184 7X.2012.714792. google scholar
• Broihanne, M.H., Merli, M., & Roger, P. (2014). Overconfidence, Risk Perception and The Risk-Taking Behavior of Finance Professionals. Finance Research Letters, 11(2), 64-73. google scholar
• Brooks, C., Sangiorgi, I., Hillenbrand, C. & Money, K. (2018). Why older investors less willing to take financial risks?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 56(2018), 52-72. google scholar
• Bucciol, A., & Miniaci, R. (2011). Household portfolios and implicit risk preference. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1235-1250. google scholar
• Byder, J., Agudela, D.A. & Arango, I. (2019). Gender matters most. The impact on short-term riskaversion following a financial crash. Review of Financial Economics, 37, 106-117. google scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with AMOS Basic concepts, applications, and programming (Multivariate Applications Series), New York: Routledge. google scholar
• Ceschia, A., Costantinia, A., Sartoria, R., Weller, J., & Di Fabio, A. (2019). Dimensions of decision-making: An evidence-based classification of heuristics and biases. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 188-200. google scholar
• Charness, G., Gneezy, U. & Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 87, 43-51 google scholar
• Charness, G., & Dave, C. (2017). Confirmation Bias with Motivated Beliefs. Games and Economic Behavior, 104, 1-23. google scholar
• Chen, C.S., Cheng, J.C., Lin, F.C., & Chihwei, P. (2017). The Role of House Money Effect and Availability Heuristic in Investor Behavior. Management Decision, 55(8), 1598-1612. google scholar
• Chira, I., Adams, M., & Thornton, B. (2008). Behavioral Bias Within The Decision Making Process. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 6(8), 11-20. google scholar
• Cipriano, M., & Gruca, T.S. (2014). The Power of Priors: How Confirmation Bias Impacts Market Prices. The Journal ofPrediction Markets, 8(3), 34-56. google scholar
• Cole, S., Sampson, T. & Zia, B. (2008). Money or knowledge? What drives the demand for financial services in developing countries (Vol. 9, (117) 09-117). Harvard Business School Working Paper. google scholar
• Costa, D.F, Carvalho, F., Bruno, C.M., & Prado, J.W. (2017). Bibliometric Analysis on the Association Between Behavioral Finance and Decision Making With Cognitive Biases Such As Overconfidence, Anchoring Effect and Confirmation Bias. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1775-1799. google scholar
• Cristina, B. (2009). The influence of saving process to reduction the effects of international financial crisis. Metalurgia International, 14, 143-149. google scholar
• Czaja, D., & Röder, F. (2020). Self-Attribution Bias and Overconfidence among Nonprofessional Traders. The Quarterly Review ofEconomics and Finance, 78(November), 186-198. google scholar
• Czerwonka, M. (2019). Cultural, cognitive and personality traits in risk taking behavior: evidencefrom Poland and the United States of America. Economic Research- Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1), 894-908. DO I:10.1080/1331677X.2019.1588766. google scholar
• De Bondt, W., Muradoglu, G., Shefrin, H., & Staikouras, S.K. (2009). Behavioral finance. Quo vadis?. Journal ofApplied Finance, 18(2), 7-21. google scholar
• Dickason, Z., & Ferreira, S. (2018). Establishing a link between risktolerance, investor personality and behavioural finance in South Africa. Cogent Economics &Finance, 6(1), 1-13. google scholar
• Dimmock, S.G. & Kouwenberg, R. (2010). Loss-aversion and household portfolio choice. Journal ofEmpi-rical Finance, 33(3), 441-459 google scholar
• Dimmock, S. G., Kouwenberg, R., Mitchell, O. S., & Peijnenburg, K. (2016). Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(3), 559-577. google scholar
• Foltice, B., & Rogers, R. (2020). Ambiguity aversion and experiential learning: implications for long-term savings decisions. Review ofBehavioral Finance. Advance online publication. google scholar
• Goetzmann, W.N., & Massa, M. (2008). Disposition Matters: Volume, Volatility, and Price Impact of a Behavioral Bias. The Journal ofPortfolio Management, 34(2), 103-125. google scholar
• Gollier, C. (2002). What does classical theory have to say about household portfolios?. Household Portfolios, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 27-54. ISBN 978-0-262-07221-2 google scholar
• Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2018). Time varying risk aversion. Journal ofFinancial Economics, 128(3), 403-421. google scholar
• Hala, Y., Abdullah, M.W., Andayani, W., Ilyas, G.B., & Akob, M. (2020). The Financial Behavior of Investment Decision Making Between Real and Financial Assets Sectors. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 635-645. google scholar
• Halko, M.-L., Kaustia, M., & Alanko, E. (2012). The gender effect in risky asset holdings. Journal ofEcono-mic Behavior and Organization, 83(2012), 66-81. google scholar
• Hooks, T., Schuitema, G., & McDermott, F. (2019). Risk Perceptions Toward Drinking Water Quality Among Private Well Owners in Ireland: The Illusion of Control. Risk Analysis, 39(8), 1741-1754. google scholar
• Huangfu, G. (2014). Individual Differences in Risk-Taking Tendency and Framing Effect. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(2), 279-284. google scholar
• Humphrey, S.J. (2004). Feedback-Conditional Regret Theory and Testing Regret-Aversion in Risky Choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 839-857. google scholar
• Jain, N., & Kesari, B. (2019). Effect of Conservatism Bias and Self-Attrıbutıon Bias on Financial Risk Tolerance of Investors, Gap Gyan, 2(1), 83-87. google scholar
• Javed, H., Bagh, T., & Razzaq, S. (2017). Herding Effects, Over Confidence, Availability Bias and Representativeness as Behavioral Determinants of Perceived Investment Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Journal of Global Economics, 5(4), 1-13. google scholar
• Jetter, M., & Walker, J.K. (2017). Anchoring in Financial Decision-Making: Evidence From Jeopardy!. Journal ofEconomic Behavior & Organization, 141(Sep.), 164-176. google scholar
• Josef, N., & Vera, J. (2017). Financial Literacy and Behavioral Skills: The Influence of Financial Literacy Level on Behavioural Skills. KnE Social Sciences, 1(2), 366-373. google scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2013). Hızlı ve Yavaş Düşünmek [Thinking, Fast and Slow] (O.Ç. Deniztekin, & F.N. Deniz-tekin, Trans.). İstanbul, Turkey: Varlık Yayınları. google scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology. 3(3), 430-454. google scholar
• Kes, D., Şahin, F. & Sevencan, N.Ö. (2021). Sağlıklı Yaşam Tarzına Ulaşma Eğilimi Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlaması ve Psikometrik Ölçümlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Turk Journal of Cardiovasc Nurse, 12(28), 88-93. google scholar
• Kılınç, N., & Kılıç, Y. (2018). The Relationshıp Between Financial Literacy and Behavioral Finance: A Study For Investment Professionals. 22. Finance Symposium 10 -13 October 2018, Mersin Turkey, pp. 479-489. google scholar
• Kliger, D., & Kudryavtsev, A. (2010). The Availability Heuristic and Investors’ Reaction to Company-Specific Events. Journal ofBehavioral Finance, 11(1), 50-65. google scholar
• Kudryavtsev, A. (2018). The Availability Heuristic and Reversals Following Large Stock Price Changes. Journal ofBehavioral Finance, 19(2), 159-176. google scholar
• Lam, D., & Ozorio, B. (2015). An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between Digit Ratio, Illusion of Control, and Risk-Taking Behavior Among Chinese College Students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(4), 1377-1385. google scholar
• Lambert, J., Bessiere, V., & N’Goala, G. (2012). Does Expertise Influence The Impact of Overconfidence on Judgment, Valuation And Investment Decision?. Journal ofEconomic Psychology, 33(6), 1115-1128. google scholar
• List, J. A. (2003). Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?. Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, 118, 41-71. google scholar
• Loewenstein, G., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286 google scholar
• Luo, G. Y. (2013). Conservatism bias in the presence of strategic interaction. Quantitative Finance, 13(7), 989-996. google scholar
• Maggi, M.A. (2006). Loss aversion and perceptual risk aversion. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50(4), 426-430. google scholar
• Maner, J.K., Gailliot, M.T., Butz, D.A., & Peruche, B.M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 451-462. google scholar
• Mannberg, A. (2012). Risk and rationalization—The role of affect and cognitive dissonance for sexual risk taking. European Economic Review, 56(6), 1325-1337. google scholar
• Martinez, F., Le Floch, V., Gaffie, B., & Villejoubert, G. (2011). Reports of Wins and Risk Taking: An Investigation of the Mediating Effect of the Illusion of Control. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(2), 271-285. google scholar
• Meertens, R.M., & Lion, R. (2011). The effects of risk-taking tendency on risk choice and pre- and post-decisional information selection. Journal of Risk Research, 14(6), 647-656. google scholar
• Mehmood, F., Bashir, T., & Khan, A. (2019). Financial Literacy as a Life-Saver: Moderating the Contribution of Behavioral Biases towards Investment Decisions, Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR), 4(3), 106-114. google scholar
• Menkhoff, L., Schmeling, M., & Schmidt, U. (2013). Overconfidence, Experience, and Professionalism: An Experimental Study. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86, 92-101. google scholar
• Merkle, C. (2017). Financial overconfidence over time: Foresight, hindsight, and insight of investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 84, 68-87. google scholar
• Meziani, A.S. and Noma, E. (2018). A New Method of Measuring Financial Risk Aversion Using Hypothetical Investment Preferences: What Does It Say in the Case of Gender Differences?. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 19(4), 450-461. google scholar
• Mishra, S., Gregson, M., & Lalumiére, M. L. (2011). Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making. British Journal of Psychology, 103(1), 83-97. google scholar
• Mota, J.H., Moreira, A.C., & Cossa, A.J.(2015). Behavioural Factors in The Financial Decisions of Young Mozambicans. South African Journal of Business Management, 46(4), 11-22. google scholar
• Mouna, A., & Jarboui, A. (2015). Financial literacy and portfolio diversification: an observation from the Tunisian stock market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(6), 808-822. google scholar
• Mrkva, K., Johnson, E.J., Gaechter, S., & Herrmann, A. (2020). Moderating Loss Aversion: Loss Aversion Has Moderators, But Reports of its Death are Greatly Exaggerated, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 407-428. google scholar
• Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2019). Individual Differences in Mental Accounting. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-15. google scholar
• Nelson, J.A. (2014). The Power of Stereotyping and Confirmation Bias To Overwhelm Accurate Assessment: The Case of Economics, Gender, and Risk Aversion. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(3), 211-232. google scholar Nickerson, R.S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: An Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. google scholar
• Peon, D., Antelo, M., & Calvo-Silvosa, A. (2017). An inclusive taxonomy of behavioral biases. European Journal of Government and Economics, 6(1), 24-58. google scholar
• Plonsky, O., & Erev, I. (2016). Learning in settings with partial feedback and the wavy recency effect of rare events. Cognitive Psychology, 93, 18-43. google scholar
• Pompian, M.M. (2008). Using Behavioral Investor Types to Build Better Relationships with Your Clients. Journal of Financial Planning. October, 64 - 76. google scholar
• Pompian, M.M. (2012). Behavioral Finance and Investor Types Managing Behavior to Make Better Investment Decisions, Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. google scholar
• Pompian, M.M. (2006). Behavioral finance and wealth management: how to build investment strategies that account for investor biases, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. google scholar
• Pretz, J.E., & Totz, K.S. (2007). Measuring individual differences in affective, heuristic, and holistic intuition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1247-1257. google scholar
• Rahim, A., Shah, M.H., & Aamir, A. (2019). Impact of Conservatism Bias Effect On Investment. City University Research Journal, 9(1), 85-97. google scholar
• Ramiah, V., Xu, X., & Moosa, I.A. (2015). Neoclassical finance, behavioral finance and noise traders: A review and assessment of the literature. International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 89-100. google scholar
• Rasool, N., & Ullah, S. (2020). Financial literacy and behavioural biases of individual investors: empirical evidence of Pakistan stock exchange. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 25(50), 261-278. google scholar
• Reb, J. (2008). Regret Aversion and Decision Process Quality: Effects of Regret Salience on Decision Process Carefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(2), 169-182. google scholar Ritika, N.K. (2020). Risk preferences for financial decisions: Do emotional biases matter?. Journal of Public Affairs. Advance online publication. google scholar
• Sahi, S.K., Arora, A.P., & Dhameja, N. (2013). An Exploratory Inquiry into the Psychological Biases in Financial Investment Behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14, 94-103. google scholar
• Sakha, S. (2019). Determinants of risk aversion over time: experimental evidence from ruralThailand. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80(2019), 184-198. google scholar
• Salman, M., Khan, B., & Javed, A. (2020). Moderated Mediation: The Impact of Heuristic Representativeness Bias on Investment Decision-Making. Academic Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 354-363. google scholar
• Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59. google scholar
• Shams, M.A. (2002). The Availability Heuristic in Judgments of Research Findings: Manipulations of Subjective Experience. The Osprey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry, All Volumes (2001-2008), 114-127. google scholar
• Shefrin, H. (2008). A Behavioral Approach to Asset Pricing (Academic Press Advanced Finance), (2nd Edition), Academic Press Elsevier, USA. google scholar
• Shefrin, H.M., & Thaler, R.H. (1988). The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609-643. google scholar
• Simon, H. (1972). Theories of Bounded Rationality. In: C. B. McGuire, & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and Organization, Amsterdam: North-Holland. (pp. 161-176). google scholar
• Smith, I., & Giroux, I. (2019). The Illusion of Control in Gambling among University Students: The Benefit of the Doubt?. Journal of Gambling Issues, 42, 107-129. google scholar
• Smith, A.R., Windschitl, P.D., & Bruchmann, K. (2013). Knowledge Matters: Anchoring Effects Are Moderated By Knowledge Level. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 97-108. google scholar
• Thaler R.H. & Sunstein C.R. (2008). Nudge. New Haven London: Yale University Press (Çev. Enver Günsel, 2013, İstanbul: Pegasus Yayınları). google scholar
• Teovanovic, P., Knezevic, G., & Stankov, L. (2015). Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality. Intelligence, 50, 75-86. google scholar
• Trehan, B., & Sinha, A.K. (2020). The Effect of Behavioral Biases on Retirement Planning. Test Engineering and Management, 82, 5367-5377. google scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. google scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. google scholar
• Van de Ven, N., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). Regret Aversion and the Reluctance to Exchange Lottery Tickets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 194-200. google scholar
• Waltz, C.F., Strcikland, O.L. & Lenz, E.R. (2010). Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company. google scholar
• Wang, J., Sheng, J., & Yang, J. (2013). Optimism bias and incentive contracts in portfolio delegation. Economic Modelling, 33, 493-499. google scholar
• Wong, K.P. (2014). Fixed Versus Variable Rate Loans Under Regret Aversion. Economic Modelling, 42, 140-145. google scholar
• Yaşlıoğlu, M.M. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Faktör Analizi ve Geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizlerinin Kullanılması. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 46(Özel Sayı), 74-85. google scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., & Beattie, J. (1997). Consequences of Regret Aversion 2: Additional Evidence for Effects of Feedback on Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(1), 63-78. google scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., Pligt, V.J., & Vries, N.K. (1996). Consequences of Regret Aversion: Effects of Expected Feedback on Risky Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(2), 148-158. google scholar
• Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972-987. google scholar