The Effect of Institutional Environment, General Self Efficacy and Desirability On Social Entrepreneurship Intentions in Turkey

Year 2021, Volume: 50 Issue: 2, 411 - 434, 07.10.2021

Aydın Kayabaşı , Ceren Karavelioğlu , Nezire Derya Ergun Özler

https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2021.50.859186

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of the institutional environment on general self-efficacy and desirability as well as the impact of general self-efficacy and desirability on social entrepreneurship intentions. For data collection a structured questionnaire was used. In total 500 questionnaires were distributed among university students and 367 usable questionnaires were returned and analysed. The structural equation modelling was used to investigate the relationship between the study variables. The findings revealed significant relationships among the research variables. It was found that the dimension of the regulatory environment has a positive impact on desirability and the dimension of the cognitive environment has a positive impact on general self-efficacy. The findings also showed a positive relationship among general self-efficacy, desirability and social entrepreneurship intentions. This study was carried out by using a convenience sampling method on university students. Within the scope of the research, the variables of the institutional environment, general self-efficacy and desirability are discussed in terms of social entrepreneurship intention. The study provides a new understanding of the factors that affect the intention of social entrepreneurship and provides an insight into which variables can be prioritized in countries with problems such as environmental pollution, migration and unemployment.

Keywords

Institutional Environment, General Self-Efficacy, Desirability, Social Entrepreneurship Intentions

Thanks

We would like to thank the journal editor and two anonymous IBR reviewers for their suggestions and comments for organizing, structuring and improving the quality of manuscript

References

• Ahmed, I., Nawaz, M. M., Ahmad, Z., Shaukat, M. Z., Usman, A., Rehman, W. U. and Ahmed, N. (2010). Determinants of students’ entrepreneurial career intentions: Evidence from business graduates. European Journal of Social Sciences, 15(2), 14-22.
• Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 27-58.
• Amine, L. S. and Staub, K. M. (2009). Women entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan Africa: An institutional theory analysis from a social marketing point of view. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(2), 183-211.
• Arasti, Z., Pasvishe, F. A. and Motavaseli, M. (2012). Normative institutional factors affecting entrepreneurial intention in iranian information technology sector. Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(2), 16.
• Austin, J., Stevenson, H. and Wei-Skillern, J. (2012). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?. Revista de Administração, 47(3), 370-384.
• Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y. and Philips, L. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organisational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458.
• British Council, Turkiye, (2019). Situation of Social Venture in Turkey. https://www.britishcouncil.org.tr/programmes/education/social-enterprise-research (Access: 13.11.2019).
• Buli, B. M. and Yesuf, W. M. (2015). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions: Technical-vocational education and training students in Ethiopia. Education+Training, 57(8/9), 891-907.
• Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, And Programming. Routledge. Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72(2), 263.
• Díaz-Casero, J.C., Ferreira, J.J.M., Mogollón, R.H. and Raposo, M.L.B. (2012). Influence of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intention: a comparative study of two countries university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), pp. 55-74. El Ebrashi, R. (2013), “Social entrepreneurship theory and sustainable social impact”, Social Responsibility Journal, 9(2), 188-209.
• Estrada-Robles,M., Williams, N. and Vorley, T. (2018). Navigating institutional challenges inMexico: the role of social capital in entrepreneurial families. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, available at: https://doi-org.proxy.library.dmu.ac.uk/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2017-0180.
• Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., ur Rehman, S., Fayolle, A., Jaafar, N. and Ayupp, K. (2018). Impact of support from social network on entrepreneurial intention of fresh business graduates: A structural equation modelling approach. Education+Training, 60(4), 335-353.
• Farrukh, M., Khan, A. A., Shahid Khan, M., Ravan Ramzani, S. and Soladoye, B. S. A. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions: the role of family factors, personality traits and self-efficacy. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(4), 303-317.
• Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• Gómez-Haro, S., Aragón-Correa, J. A. and Cordón-Pozo, E. (2011). Differentiating the effects of the institutional environment on corporate entrepreneurship. Management Decision, 49(10), 1677-1693.
• Gökbulut Özdemir, Ö. (2013). Entrepreneurial marketing and social value creation in Turkish art industry: An ambidextrous perspective. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 39-60.
• Guerrero, M., Rialp, J. and Urbano, D. (2008). The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions: A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1), 35-50.
• Gupta, V. K., Guo, C., Canever, M., Yim, H. R., Sraw, G. K. and Liu, M. (2014). Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 367-384.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. and G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014a). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research”, European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
• Hair, Jr. J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2014b). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edition. Pearson New International Edition, UK.
• Hallam, C., Zanella, G., Dorantes Dosamantes, C. A. and Cardenas, C. (2016). Measuring entrepreneurial intent? Temporal construal theory shows it depends on your timing. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 22(5) 671-697.
• Helvacıoğlu, E. (2013). Social entrepreneurship dimensions of Libraries. Bilgi Dünyası, 14(1), 199-203.
• Hockerts K. (2006). Entrepreneurial Opportunity in Social Purpose Business Ventures. In: Mair J., Robinson J., Hockerts K. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Hockerts, K. (2015). The social entrepreneurial antecedents scale (SEAS): A validation study. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(3), 260-280.
• Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
• Huang, C. C., Wang, Y. M., Wu, T. W. and Wang, P. A. (2013). An empirical analysis of the antecedents and performance consequences of using the moodle platform. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(2), 217.
• Işık, V. (2015). Analysis of social venture structuring in Turkey: A Field Study on Ashoka Fellow Social Initiatives. Journal of Karatahta Business Writing, 1(1): 63-76.
• Jerusalem, M. and Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195-213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
• Jiao, H. (2011). A conceptual model for social entrepreneurship directed toward social impact on society. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(2), 130-149.
• Kannampuzha, M. and Hockerts, K. (2019). Organizational social entrepreneurship: scale development and validation. Social Enterprise Journal. Emerald Publishing Ltd. 1750-8614.
• Lacap, J. P. G., Mulyaningsih, H. D. and Ramadani, V. (2018). The mediating effects of social entrepreneurial antecedents on the relationship between prior experience and social entrepreneurial intent: The case of Filipino and Indonesian university students. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(3), 329-346.
• Lee, J. W. and Tai, S. W. (2010). Motivators and inhibitors of entrepreneurship and small business development in Kazakhstan. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 6(1/2), 61-75.
• Liñán, F. and Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
• Liñán, F. and Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907-933.
• Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U. and Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439-457.
• Mair, J. and Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
• Miranda, F. J., Chamorro-Mera, A., Rubio, S. and Pérez-Mayo, J. (2017). Academic entrepreneurial intention: the role of gender. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 66-86.
• Muñoz, P. (2018). A cognitive map of sustainable decision-making in entrepreneurship: A configurational approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 24(3), 787-813.
• Omorede, A. (2014). Exploration of motivational drivers towards social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(3), 239-267.
• Otache, I. (2019). Enhancing the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education: the role of entrepreneurial lecturers. Education+Training, 61(7/8), 918-939.
• Petrella, F. and Richez-Battesti, N. (2014). Social entrepreneur, social entrepreneurship and social enterprise: semantics and controversies. Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 2(14), 143-156.
• Petrovskaya, I. and Mirakyan, A. (2018). A mission of service: social entrepreneur as a servant leader. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 24(3), 755-767.
• Pihie, Z.A.L., (2009). Entrepreneurship as a career choice: An analysis of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention of university students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 338-349.
• Pinho, J. C. M. and Thompson, D. (2017). Institutional-driven dimensions and the capacity to start a business: A preliminary study based on two countries. International Marketing Review, 34(6), 787-813.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5). 879-903.
• Politis, K., Ketikidis, P., Diamantidis, A. D. and Lazuras, L. (2016). An investigation of social entrepreneurial intentions formation among South-East European postgraduate students. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(4), 1120-1141.
• Ramseook-Munhurrun, P., Seebaluck, V. N. and Naidoo, P. (2015). Examining the structural relationships of destination image, perceived value, tourist satisfaction and loyalty: case of Mauritius. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175, 252-259.
• Roper, J. and Cheney, G. (2005). The meanings of social entrepreneurship today. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 95-104.
• Sambharya, R. and Musteen, M. (2014). Institutional environment and entrepreneurship: An empirical study across countries”, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 12(4), 314-330.
• Schumacker, R.E. and Lomax, R.G. (2004). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Second Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey.
• Seelos, C., Mair, J., Battilana, J. and Tina Dacin, M. (2011). The embeddedness of social entrepreneurship: understanding variation across local communities. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 33(4), 333-363.
• Shahab, Y., Chengang, Y., Arbizu, A. D. and Haider, M. J. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: do entrepreneurial creativity and education matter?. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 25(2), 259-280.
• Sine, W.D. and David, R.J. (2010). Institutions and entrepreneurship. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Research in the Sociology of Work, 21, 1–26.
• Solesvik, M. Z. (2013). Entrepreneurial motivations and intentions: investigating the role of education major. Education+Training, 55(3), 253-271.
• Sundin, E. (2011). Entrepreneurship and social and community care. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 5(3), 212-222.
• Taş, H.Y. and Şemşek, İ. (2017). Examples from Turkey and the world on social entrepreneurship and contribution to employment, HAK-İŞ International Journal of Labour and Society, 6(6): 481-497.
• Tillmar, M. (2009). Societal entrepreneurs in the health sector: crossing the frontiers. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 282-298.
• Tiwari, P., Bhat, A.K. and Tikoria, J. (2017). An empirical analysis of the factors affecting social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7(9), 1-25.
• Toledano, N. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: the new narrative for the practice of the social economy. CIRIEC-España Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 73, 9-31.
• Tran, A.T. and Von Korflesch, H. (2016). A conceptual model of social entrepreneurial intention based on the social cognitive career theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 17-38.
• Turkina, E. and Thi Thanh Thai, M. (2013). Social capital, networks, trust and immigrant entrepreneurship: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 7(2), 108-124.
• Urban, B. (2013). Social entrepreneurship in an emerging economy: A focus on the institutional environment and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, 11(1), 3-25.
• Urban, B. (2015). Evaluation of social enterprise outcomes and self-efficacy. International Journal of Social Economics, 42(2), 163-178.
• Urban, B. and Kujinga, L. (2017). The institutional environment and social entrepreneurship intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 23(4), 638-655.
• Uysal, B. and Güney, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial Intentions of Turkish Business Students: An Exploration Using Shapero’s Model. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(28), 27-47.
• Veciana, J. M., Aponte, M. and Urbano, D. (2005). University students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship: A two countries comparison. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(2), 165-182.
• Weerawardena, J. and Mort, G.S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35.
• Welsh, D.H. and Krueger, N. (2012). The evolution of social entrepreneurship: what have we learned?. Journal of Technology Management in China, 7(3), 270-290.
• Welter, F. and Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107-125.
• Zebryte, I., and Jorquera, H. (2017). Chilean tourism sector “B Corporations”: evidence of social entrepreneurship and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 23(6), 866-879.
• Zhao, H., Seibert, S.E. and Hills, G.E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272.