The Effect of Organizational Identification on Green Organizational Behavior

Year 2023, Volume: 52 Issue: 2, 233 - 250, 28.11.2023

Neriman Çelik , Ali Erbaşı

https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2023.52.1008617

Abstract

There is a great deal of academic research that shows employees identified with their organization display behavior in favor of the organization. The subject of this research is based on the assumption that employees identified with the organization they work for will have more green organizational behavior. Simple random sampling method was used in the research. 250 administrative staff willing to participate in the survey from 250 different businesses working in Konya Organized Industrial Zone 1 constituted the sample of the research. The survey technique was used as the data collection technique and data were collected by face-to-face interview method. The total of 250 questionnaires was analyzed through the SPSS 21.0 program. According to descriptive statistics, it was determined that the organizational identification levels of the participants were at a medium level whereas they had a high level of green organizational behavior. In order to evaluate the main hypothesis of the research, regression analysis was performed, and as a result, it was determined that organizational identification significantly predicted green organizational behavior, and organizational identification had a positive and significant effect on green organizational behavior. Accordingly, as the organizational identification level of the employees increases, the green organizational behavior also increases.

Keywords

Identity, Organizational Identification, Ecological Sustainability, Green Organizational Behavior

References

• Alberth, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 7, 263-295. google scholar
• Alberth, S., Asforth, B. E., & Dutoon, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13-17. google scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory Of Planned Behaviour, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proces-ses, 50, 179-211. google scholar
• Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural envi-ronmental issues in U.S. business organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 548-570. google scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. google scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325-374. google scholar
• Başar, U., & Basım, N. (2015). Effects of organizational identification on job satisfaction: Moderating role of organizational politics. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 22(2), 663-683. google scholar
• Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi (3rd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Yayınları. google scholar
• Chen, S., Wu, Wen-Chuan, Chang, C., Lin, C., Kung, J., Weng, H., Lin, Y., & Lee, S. (2015). Organizational justice, trust and identification and their effects on organizational commitment in hospital nursing staff, BMC Health Services Research, 15(363), 1-17. google scholar
• Ciocirlan, C. E. (2017). Environmental workplace behaviors: Definition matters. Organization & Environ-ment, 30(1), 51-70. google scholar
• Drzensky, F., & van Dick, R. (2013). Organizational identification and organizational change. In S. Oreg, A. google scholar
• Michel, & R. T. By (Eds.), The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective (pp. 275-297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263. google scholar
• Erbaşı, A. (2019). Yeşil örgütsel davranış ölçeği: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. İstanbul Management Jo-urnal, 86, 1-23. google scholar
• Erbaşı, A., Sanioğlu, Z., & Çelik, A. (2015). Örgütsel sosyalleşme ve dayanışmanın örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisi: Sosyalleşme ve dayanışma ilişkisinde özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü. 3. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, 6-7 Kasım, Tokat, 178-186. google scholar
• Erbaşı, A., & Özalp, Ö. (2016). Çevre tutkusu ve yeşil örgütsel davranışın örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi. Eurasian Business and Economics Journal, 2, 297-306. google scholar
• Erdem, H., Gökmen, Y., & Türen, U. (2015). The impact of psychological capital on organizational iden-tification and mediating role of perceived organizational support: A structural equation modeling study. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 38-62. google scholar
• Foote, N. N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American Sociological Review, 16, 14-21. google scholar
• Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Member’s identification with multiple-identity organizations. Orga-nization Science, 13(6), 618-635. google scholar
• Ghannam, A. A., & Taamneh, M. M. (2017). The impact of organizational identification on organizational commitment among governmental employees in Jordan. International Review of Management and Busi-ness Research, 6(3), 1026-1034. google scholar
• Graves, L. M., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2013). How transformational leadership and employee motivation com-bine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81-91. google scholar
• Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Admi-nistrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 176-190. google scholar
• He, H., & Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for the future research, SageJournals.http://opus.bath.ac.uk/35147/1/Brown_ Group_and_Organization_Management_2013_38_1_3.pdf google scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (2001). Linking organizational and field level analyses: The diffusion of corporate environ-mental practice. Organization & Environment, 14(2), 133-156. google scholar
• Jones, C., & Volpe, E. H. (2010). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social iden-tities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(13), 413-434. google scholar
• Mael, F., & Ashforth B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123. google scholar
• Mael, F. A., & Tetric, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Pyschological Measurement, 52, 813-822. google scholar
• Miao, Q., Eva, N., Newman, A., & Schwarz, G. (2019) Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification. Public Money & Management, 39(2), 77-85. google scholar
• Olson, B., Megan J., Iyer, A., Fielding, K., & Zacher, H. (2013). Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. Journal of Organi-zational Behavior, 34, 156-175. google scholar
• Özdemir, C. (2001). Kimlik ve söylem. Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, 107-122. google scholar
• Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2015). The psychology of green organizations. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 217-233. google scholar
• Sammara, A., & Biggiero, L. (2001). Identity and identification in industrial districts. Journal of Manage-ment and Governance, 5, 61-82. google scholar
• Scott, C. R, Corman, S. R., & Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory Eight: Three August, 8(3), 298-336. google scholar
• Sökmen, A., & Bıyık, Y. (2016). Örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel özdeşleşme, kişi-örgüt uyumu ve iş tatmini ilişkisi: Bilişim uzmanlarına yönelik bir araştırma. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 9(2), 221-227. google scholar
• Subba, D. (2019). Antecedent and consequences of organizational identification: A study in the tourism sec-tor of Sikkim. Future Business Journal, 5(1), 1-9. google scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Reviews Psychol, 33, 1-39. google scholar
• Tatachari, S. (2014). Dynamics of organizational identification, psychological contract breach and prestige during early socialization. Indian Institute of Management Udaipur Research Paper Series No. 20122171274, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2378234 google scholar
• Tüzün, İ. (2006). Örgütsel güven, örgütsel kimlik ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisi; Uygulamalı bir çalışma (Doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara). google scholar
• Wiernik, B. M., Dilchert, S., & Ones, D. S. (2016) Age and employee green behaviors: A meta analysis, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/. google scholar