ARAÇSAL AĞLARIN AFET SENARYOLARINDAKİ PERFORMANSLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Abstract

Can ve mal kaybına yol açan doğal olaylara doğal afetler denilmektedir. Doğal afetler için önlem alınsa da önlemek mümkün değildir. Büyük çaplı doğal afetler ekonomi, enerji, sağlık, ulaştırma ve iletişim gibi konularda büyük zararlara yol açmaktadır. Ulaştırma ve telekomünikasyon, insan hayatının kaybı, ekonomik maliyet ve aksaklıkların en aza indirilmesi için afet müdahale ve yönetiminde kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Doğal afetlerden sonra iletişim kısmen veya tamamen tahrip olabilir. İletişimin devamlılığını sağlamak için yıllar boyunca Mobil bağlantı MANET , Araçlar Arası Bağlantı VANET , Gecikme Toleranslı Ağlar DTN gibi özel çözümler ortaya çıkmıştır

Keywords

• AODV,DSDV,DSR,NS3,OLSR,SUMO,ZRP

A Comparision of Vanet Routing Protocols Performance for Emergency Situations

Abstract

Natural phenomena that cause loss of life and property are called natural disasters. It is not possible to prevent natural disasters if measures are taken. Large-scale natural disasters cause major damage to the economy, energy, health, transport and communication. Transportation and telecommunications play a critical role in disaster response and management in order to minimize the loss of human life, economic costs and disruptions. After natural disasters, communication may be partially or completely destroyed. Over the years, special solutions have emerged to ensure the continuity of communication, such as Mobile connectivity MANET , Inter-Vehicle Connectivity VANET , and Delay Tolerant Networks DTN .

Keywords

• AODV,DSDV,DSR,NS3,OLSR,SUMO,ZRP

References

1. Baldessari, R., Bodekker, B., Deegener, M., Festag, A., Franz, W., Kellum, C. C., Kosch, T., Kovacs, A., Lenardi, M., Menig, C. et. al. (2007). Car-2-Car Communication Consortium - Manifesto.
2. Bhoopathy, V. M., Frej, M. B. H., Richard, S., Amalorpavaraj, E., & Bhoopathy, A. M. (2016). Zone Routing
3. Protocol (ZRP) - A novel routing protocol for vehicular ad-hoc networks. Cunha, F., Villas, L., Boukerche, A., Maia, G., Viana, A., Mini, R. A. F., & Loureiro, A. A. F. (2016). Data communication in VANETs: Protocols, applications and challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 44, 90–103.
4. Gupta, A., Singh, R., Ather, D. & Shukla, R. S. (2016). Comparison of various routing algorithms for VANETS.
5. International Conference System Modeling & Advancenment in Research Trends (SMART), Morabadabad, (pp. 157). India: IEEE Jagdale, B. N., Patil, P., Lahane, P., & Javale, D. (2012). Analysis and comparison of distance vector, DSDV and AODV protocol of MANET. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(2), 121-131.
6. Li, F., & Wang, Y. (2007). Routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey. IEEE Vehicular technology magazine, (2), 12-22.
7. OLSR Protocols. Network Sorcery, http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/olsr.htm Perkins, C. E., & Bhagwat, P. (1994). Highly dynamic destination- sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. SIGCOMM `94 Computer Communication Review, 24(4), 234–244.
8. Perkins, C. E. & Royer, E. M. (1999). Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 2nd IEEE Workshop WMCSA ’99 New Orleans, LA, (pp. 90-100). USA: IEEE

9. Toulni, H. & Nsiri, B. (2015). A hybrid routing protocol for vanet using ontology. Procedia Computer Science, , 94–101.