Pilgrims Speaking Angry Words: Change and Anger in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales

Abstract

Medieval literature presents emotions such as anger as negative and destructive for the development of the medieval subject and society and defines anger not as a positive constructive affect but as an emotive reaction that should be suppressed, controlled or avoided. Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, written against a background of tremendous change generated by political and religious conflict, the Black Death and the Peasants’ Revolt, acknowledges anger as an essential element of medieval culture although it does not give much space to the causes of it. The Canterbury pilgrims experience and perform anger as a result of the unstructured and fast change taking place in the traditional stabilities. Indeed, the changing society represented by the pilgrims in the Canterbury Tales appears to have anger issues and accordingly is characterised by situations of conflict and emotional crises. The pilgrims are presented as failing in terms of conformity and obedience to the regulatory principles of the feudal structure also because they foster anger and have angry responses when they are expected to suppress, avoid and control their anger. Anger in this context is presented as an essential element of the new culture that produces it. This paper reads Chaucer’s representation of anger as an affect/emotion in the Canterbury Tales and argues that as an emotive/affective agent, anger performed by the defiant pilgrims represents and forms the cultural response to the pervasive change and its results in the medieval feudal social structure represented in the Canterbury Tales.

Keywords

• Chaucer
• the Canterbury Tales
• anger
• anger and socio-cultural change
• Peasants’ Revolt and anger

References

1. Ahmed, Sara. “Happy Objects.” The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 29-51.
2. Amtower, Laurel and Jacqueline Vanhoutte. A Companion to Chaucer and His Contemporaries: Texts and Contexts. Broadview Press, 2009.
3. Blamires, Alcuin. Chaucer, Ethics and Gender. Oxford University Press, 2006.
4. Bryant L. Brantley. “Accounting For Affect in the Reeve’s Tale.” Medieval Affect, Feeling, and Emotion, edited by Glenn D. Burger and Holly A. Crocker, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 118-138.
5. Burger, Glenn D., and Holly A. Crocker. “Introduction.” Medieval Affect, Feeling, and Emotion, edited by Glenn D. Burger and Holly A. Crocker, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 1-24.
6. Burger, Glenn. “Becoming One Flesh, Inhabiting Two Genders: Ugly Feelings and Blocked Emotion in the Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale.” Medieval Affect, Feeling, and Emotion, edited by Glenn D. Burger and Holly A. Crocker, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 90-117.
7. Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer, edited by Larry D. Benson, Oxford University Press, 1987.
8. Cooper, Helen. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. Oxford University Press, 1996.

9. Crocker, Holly A. Chaucer’s Visions of Manhood. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
10. DeMarco, Patricia. “Imagining Jewish Affect in the Siege of Jerusalem.” Medieval Affect, Feeling, and Emotion, edited by Glenn D. Burger and Holly A. Crocker, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 47-69.
11. Dinshaw, Carolyn. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.
12. Downes, Stephanie. “Geoffrey Chaucer: Reading With Feeling”. The Routledge Companion to Literature, edited by Patrick Colm Hogan, Bradley J. Irish, and Lalita Pandit Hogan, Routledge, 2022, pp. 409-420.
13. Friedman, Paul. “Peasant Anger in the Late Middle Ages.” Anger’s Past: The Social Uses of an Emotion in the Middle Ages, edited by Barbara H. Rosenwein, Cornell University Press, 1998, pp.171-188.
14. Froissart, Jean. Chronicles. Selected, translated and edited by Geoffrey Brereton, Penguin Books, 1968.
15. Ganim, John M. “Identity and Subjecthood.” Chaucer: An Oxford Guide, edited by Stephen Paul Ellis. Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 224-38. E-book. http://opac.regestaimperii.de/lang_en/anzeige.php?sammelwerk=Chaucer.+An+Oxford+Guide&p=1047656.
16. Gower, John. “Vox Clamantis”, The Gower Project Translation. Edited by Robert J. Meindl, 2022. http://gowertranslation.pbworks.com/w/page/149185233/Vox%20Clamantis%20Book%20I.
17. Griffith, John Lance. Anger in the Canterbury Tales. 2005. University of Virginia, PhD Thesis.
18. Hilton Rodney H. Bond Men Made Free: Medieval Peasant Movements and the English Rising of 1381. Routledge, first publ.1973, 2003.
19. Lynch, Andrew. “The History of Emotions and Literature.” The Routledge Companion to Literature, edited by Patrick Colm Hogan, Bradley J. Irish and Lalita Pandit Hogan, Routledge, 2022, pp. 98-109.
20. Mann, Jill. “Anger and ‘Glosynge’ in the Canterbury Tales.” Life in Words: Essays on Chaucer, the Gawain-Poet, and Malory, edited and with an introduction by Mark David Rasmussen, University of Toronto Press, 2014, pp. 80-101.
21. ---. Chaucer and Medieval Estates Satire. Cambridge, 1973.
22. McNamer, Sarah. “Emotion.” A New Companion to Chaucer, edited by Peter Brown, Wiley-Blackwell, 2019, pp. 123–36.
23. Miller, Mark. “Ideology and Subjectivity in the Canterbury Tales.” A Companion to Medieval English Literature and Culture: C.1350-1500, edited by Peter Brown, Blackwell, 2007, pp. 554-68.
24. Olson, Paul A. The Canterbury Tales and the Good Society. Princeton University Press, 1986.
25. Patterson, Lee. Chaucer and the Subject of History. University of Wisconsin Press,1991.
26. ---. “‘No Man His Reson Herde’: Peasant Consciousness, Chaucer’s Miller, and the Structure of the Canterbury Tales.” Literary Practice and Social Change in Britain, 1380-1530, edited by Lee Patterson, University of California Press, 1990, pp.113-155.
27. ---. “‘The Parson’s Tale’ and the Quitting of the ‘Canterbury Tales’”. Traditio, Vol. 34, 1978, pp. 331-380.
28. Platt, Colin. King Death: The Black Death and Its Aftermath in Late-Medieval England. UCL Press, 1997.
29. Postan, M. M. Medieval Economy and Society: An Economic History of Britain 100-1500. University of California Press, 1972.
30. Rayner, Samantha J. Images of Kingship in Chaucer and His Ricardian Contemporaries. D.S. Brewer, 2006.
31. Rigby, S.H. “English Society in the Later Middle Ages: Deference, Ambition and Conflict.” A Companion to Medieval English Literature and Culture: C.1350-1500, edited by Peter Brown, Blackwell, 2007, pp. 25-39.
32. ---. “Ideology.” A New Companion to Chaucer, edited by Peter Brown, Wiley Blackwell, 2019, pp. 201-12.
33. Rosenwein, Barbara H. Anger: The Conflicted History of an Emotion. The Yale University Press, 2020.
34. ---. Generations of Feeling: A History of Emotions, 600–1700. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
35. Tupper, Frederick. “The Quarrels of the Canterbury Pilgrims.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology, Vol. 14, 1915, pp. 256–70.
36. Wawrzyniak, Agnieszka. “Cognitive Metaphors of Anger and Madness in The Canterbury Tales.” Eger Journal of English Studies, Vol. XV, 2015, pp. 35-48.
37. White, D. Stephen. “The Politics of Anger.” Anger’s Past: The Social Uses of an Emotion in the Middle Ages, edited by Barbara H. Rosenwein, Cornell University Press, 1998, pp. 127-152.