VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE NURSES’ ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY SCALE – ACUTE CARE VERSION: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 346 - 362, 30.09.2022

Meltem Akbaş , Emine İbici Akça , Cemile Onat Köroğlu , Şule Gökyıldız Sürücü

https://doi.org/10.52538/iduhes.1095052

Abstract

This is a methodological study that aims to adapt the NAQS-ACV scale to the Turkish context, as well as to test its validity and reliability. The study was conducted in 1 medical Faculty hospital, 2 public hospitals, and 1 private hospital in a city located in the southern part of Turkey between the 1st of January and 31st of March 2016. The study included 427 nurses who worked in the internal diseases, surgery, and obstetric clinics of the related hospitals. Data were collected through the “Nurse Information Form” and “Nurses’ Assessment of Quality Scale – Acute Care Version”. While the validity analysis of the NAQS-ACV included language, scope, and construct analysis, reliability analysis included internal consistency reliability analysis. The 77-item Turkish version of the NAQS-ACV was composed of 3 sections and 8 sub-scales. Sub-scale KMO values of the scale ranged between 0.775 and 0.948, and the Barlett test result was found p<0.001. CFA fit indices of the scale were in an acceptable range. Cronbach’s alpha values of the scale were found 0.814 -0.960. No items in the original scale were excluded from the scale as a result of the reliability and validity analyses of the Turkish form of the NAQS-ACV Scale. In conclusion, the Turkish form of the NAQS-ACV scale was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool. It is recommended to conduct the test-retest analysis of the scale in different groups.

Keywords

Nurse, Care, Quality, Validity-Reliability

References

• Akbas, M. (2019). Patient satisfaction on nursing care: the case of gynecology and obstetrics clinics. Acta bioethica, 25(1), 127-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2019000100127
• Alpar, C. (2016). Applied statistics and validity and reliability with examples from sports, health and education sciences. Ankara: Detail Publishing.
• Blasdell, N.D. (2017). The meaning of caring in nursing practice. Int J Nurs Clin Pract, 4(238), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2017/238
• Burhans, L.M., & Alligood, M.R. (2010). Quality nursing care in the words of nurses. Journal of advanced nursing, 66(8), 1689-1697.
• Capık, C. (2016). Use of confıdentıal factor analysıs ın valıdıty and relıabılıty studıes. Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 17(3):196-205.
• Celik H. E., & Yilmaz V (2016). Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd Ed. Ankara, Turkey: Anı Publishing, 23-51.
• Church, C.D. (2016). Defining competence in nursing and its relevance to quality care. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(5), E9-E14. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000289
• Costello, M. (2017). Nurses’ Self-Identified Characteristics and Behaviors Contributing to Patients’ Positive Perceptions of Their Nursing Care: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 35(1), 62-66. 10.1177/0898010116643835
• Gul, S. (2019). Nursıng care ın the lıght of care concept and affectıng factors. ACU Sağlık Bil Derg, 10(2), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.31067/0.2019.134
• Karaca, A., & Durna, Z. (2018). Nursing Care Quality and Associated Factors. Health and Society, 28(3), 16-23.
• Kol, E., Geckil, E., Arıkan, C., Ilter, M., Ozcan, O., Sakırgun, E., ... & Uslular, E. (2017). Investigation of nursing care perception in Turkey. Acibadem University Journal of Health Sciences , 8, 163-72.
• Koy, V., Yunibhand, J., Angsuroch, Y., & Fisher, M.L. (2015). Relationship between nursing care quality, nurse staffing, nurse job satisfaction, nurse practice environment, and burnout: literature review. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(8), 1825-1831. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150288
• Lynn, M.R., McMillen, B.J., & Sidani, S. (2007). Including the provider in the assessment of quality care: development and testing of the Nurses' assessment of quality scale—acute care version. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 22(4), 328-336. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000290414.42640.c0 Molina-Mula, J., & Gallo-Estrada, J. (2020). Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in decision-making. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), 835.
• Mororo, D.D.D.S., Enders, B. C., Lira, A.L.B.D.C., Silva, C.M.B.D., & Menezes, R.M.P.D. (2017). Concept analysis of nursing care management in the hospital context. Acta paulista de enfermagem, 30, 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201700043
• Ozturk, H., Demirsoy, N., Sayligil, O., & Florczak, K.L. (2020). Patients’ perceptions of nursing care in a university hospital. Nursing science quarterly, 33(1), 12-18. DOI: 10.1177/089431841988179
• Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147
• Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., Stockert, P., Hall, A., & Ostendorf, W.R. (2016). Fundamentals of Nursing. (9th Ed.), USD: Elsevier, Retrieved from: EVELVE.ELSEVIER.COM.
• Tavsancil, E. (2014). Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Publications.
• Yorke, D. (2016). Patient care: what is it. Journal of Patient Care, 2(2), DOI: 10.4172/2573-4598.1000e101
• Yurdugul, H. (2005). Using content validity indexes for content validity in scale development studies. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, 1, 771-774.