Evaluating the performance of inflation targeting regime in three   Asian economies

Abstract

We conduct empirical analysis in evaluating the performance of inflation targeting (IT) in three emerging East-Asian economies that have implemented this regime. These three economies are Korea, Philippines and Thailand. The performance of inflation targeting regime is evaluated by comparing the economic achievement and structure changed between the pre- and post- IT periods. In particular, evaluation is focused on the inter-relationship between inflation and output growth / gap in these emerging economies between the pre- and post-IT periods. The inflation rate and the change in the macroeconomic variables are observed through country specific data. A bivariate GARCH (1,1) model is applied to study the inter-relationship between inflation and output gap. The results also enable us to detect if IT regime induces disinflation cost by causing lower growth or higher output gap. We compare the results of GARCH with the results of structural VAR for robustness checking. Both analyses provide consistent results. We observe lower inflation rate in the post-IT period. However, there is no significant correlation between inflation and output gap and we find no evidence that lower inflation causes lower growth or higher output gap. Both output gap and inflation are determined mainly by their own impulses. Besides, output gap is more persistent than inflation. We conclude that IT regime has improved the economies of these countries.

Keywords

• inflation targeting, trade-off, persistency of shock, emerging markets

References

1. Adolfson, M. (2007). Incomplete exchange rate pass-through and simple monetary policy rules. Journal of International Money and Finance 26, 468-494.
2. Ball, L. (1999). Policy rules for open economies. In: Taylor, J.B. (Ed.). Monetary policy rules. The University of Chicago Press: 127-156.
3. Ball, L. and Sheridan, N. (2005). Does inflation targeting matter?.in B.S. Bernanke and M. Woodford, eds., inflation targeting, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Blanchard, O. J. and Quah, D. (1989). The Dynamic Effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review 79(4), 655-673.
5. Breitung, J. et al. (2004). Structural vector autoregressive modeling and impulse responses. In
6. Applied time series econometrics. Cambridge University Press.
7. Bernanke, B.S. ; Laubach, T. ; Mishkin, F.S. and Posen, A.S. (1999). Inflation targeting: lessons from the international experience, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
8. Berument, H and Yuksel, E. (2006). Effects of adopting inflation targeting regimes on inflation variability. Physica A. 375, 265-273.

9. Bleaney, M. (2000). Exchange rate regimes and inflation persistence. IMF Staff Papers 47(3), 387-402.
10. Brenner, M. and Sokoler, M. (2006). Inflation targeting and exchange rate regimes, evidence from the financial markets. New York University & Bank of Israel.
11. Cecchetti, S.G. and Ehrmann, M. (2000). Does inflation targeting increase output volatility?
12. An international, comparison of policymakers’ preferences and outcomes. Central
13. Bank of Chile working papers no. 69.
14. Cukierman, A. ; Webb, S. B. and Neyapti, B. (1992). Measuring the Independence of Central
15. Banks and its Effects on Policy Outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review, 6, 353- 398.
16. Debelle, G. (2000). The viability of inflation targeting for emerging market economies. Paper prepared for the conference on “Financial Markets and Policies in East Asia”, Australian National University, September.
17. Eichengreen, B.J. and Hausmann, R. (2003). Debt denominatin and financial instability in emerging market economies. Manuscript, UC Berkeley.
18. Engle, R. F. and Kroner, K. F. (1995). Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econometric Theory, 11, 122-150.
19. Fraga, A. ; Goldfajn, I. and Minella, A. (2003). Inflation targeting in emerging market economies. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 18: 365-400.
20. Ftiti, Z. and Essaadi, E. (2008). The inflation targeting effect on the inflation series: a new analysis approach of evolutionary spectral analysis. GATE Groupe d’ Analyse et de Théorie Économique. Working paper no 08-32.
21. Garcia, C.J. (2000). Chilean stabilization policy during the 1990. University of California at Los Angeles. Mimeo.
22. Goncalves, C.E.S. and Carvalho, A. (2006). Inflation targeting matters: Evidence from OECD economies’ sacrifice ratios. University of Sao Paulo.
23. Green, J.H. (1996). Inflation targeting: Theory and policy implications. Staff Papers– International Monetary Fund. 43(4), 779-795.
24. Hausmann,R., Panizza,U. & Rigobon,R. 2004. The long run volatility puzzle of the real exchange rate. NBER working paper no. 10751.
25. Honda,Y. (2000). Some tests on the effects of inflation targeting in New Zealand, Canada and UK. Economic Letters, 66, 1-6.
26. Huh C. (1996). Some evidence on the efficacy of the UK inflation targeting regime: an out-of sample forecast approach. International Discussion Papers, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, N. 565, Sep/1996. 30p.
27. Ito, T. and Hayshi, T. (2004). “Inflation Targeting in Asia”, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research, Occasional Paper No 1.
28. Kadioğlu, F. ; Özdemir, N. and Yilmaz, G. (2000). Inflation targeting in developing countries. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
29. Karanasos, M and Kim, J. (2005). The inflation-output variability relationship in the G3: A bivariate GARCH (BEKK) approach. Risk Letters 1(2), 17-22.
30. Lai, C. and Chang, J. (2001). A note on inflation targeting. The Journal of Economic Education 32(4), 369-380.
31. Lee, J. (1999). The inflation and output variability tradeoff: evidence from a GARCH model. Economic Letters 62: 63-67.
32. Mishkin, F.S. and Posen, A.S. (1997). Inflation targeting: lessons from four countries. Economic Policy Review 3: 9-110.
33. Mishkin, F.S. and Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2007). Does inflation targeting make a difference?.In: Frederic Mishkin and Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, eds., Series on Central Banking, Analysis and Economic Policies XI: Monetary policy under inflation targeting. Banco Central de Chile.
34. Monacelli, T. (2003). Monetary policy in a low pass through environment. European Central Bank working paper no. 227.
35. Pétursson, T.G. (2004). The effects of inflation targeting on macroeconomic performance. Central Bank of Iceland. Working paper no. 23.
36. Ramos-Francia, M. and Capistrán, C. (2007). Does inflation targeting affect the dispersion of inflation expectations? Banco de México. Working Paper 2007-11.
37. Senay, O. (2001). The role of exchange rate in monetary policy rules. Middle East Technical University & University of York.
38. Sek, S.K. (2010). The formation of monetary policy in the emerging East-Asian countries. Economic structures, the source of shocks and the role of exchange rate. VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller.
39. Senda, T and Smith, J. K. (2008). Inflation history and the sacrifice ratio: episode-specific evidence. Contemporary Economic Policy, 26 (3), 409-419.
40. Tunali, D. (2008). Inflation and the sacrifice ratio: the effect of monetary policy design. Rutgers University
41. Taguchi, H. and Kato, C. (2011). Assessing the performance of inflation targeting in East Asian economies. Asian Pacific Economic Literature, 93-102.
42. Vega, M. and Winkelried, D. (2005). Inflation targeting and inflation behavior: A successful story? International Journal of Central Banking, 3:153-75.