Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences

Volume: 4 Number: 2 September 1, 2012
  • Asad Zaman
EN

Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences

Abstract

Econometric Methodology is based on logical positivist principles. Since logical positivism has collapsed, it is necessary to re-think these foundations. We show that positivist methodology has led econometricians to a meaningless search for patterns in the data. An alternative methodology which relates observed patterns to real causal structures is proposed.

Keywords

References

  1. Atiq-ur-Rahman, (2011). “Impact of Model Specification Decisions on Unit Root Tests,” International Econometric Review, 3(2), 22-33.
  2. Ayer, A. J. (2008). interview with Brian Magee, www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cnRJGs08hE
  3. Barzel, Y. (1972). “The rate of technical progress: The “Indianapolis 500” Journal of Economic Theory, 4(1), 72-81.
  4. Freedman, D.A. (1997). From Association to Causation via Regression.In Causality in Crisis?ed. V. McKim and S. Turner.University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend, (with discussion) 113-82. Reprinted in Advances in Applied Mathematics, 18, 59-110.
  5. Freedman, D. A (1991). “Statistical Models and Shoe Leather”. Sociological Methodology, 21, 291–313.
  6. Freedman, D.A. (2008). On types of scientific enquiry: Nine success stories in medical research. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, ed. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady and David Collier. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  7. Freedman, D.A.; Pisani, R. and R. Purves (2007). Statistics. Norton, New York
  8. Hendri, S.B. (2012), “Export Led Growth Hypothesis: An Analysis of Indonesia’s Trade Policy Pre and Post 1997 Financial Crises” Ph.D. Thesis submitted to IIIE, International Islamic University of Islamabad.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

-

Authors

Asad Zaman This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2012

Submission Date

September 1, 2012

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2012 Volume: 4 Number: 2

APA
Zaman, A. (2012). Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences. International Econometric Review, 4(2), 99-122. https://izlik.org/JA23AF26WC
AMA
1.Zaman A. Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences. IER. 2012;4(2):99-122. https://izlik.org/JA23AF26WC
Chicago
Zaman, Asad. 2012. “Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences”. International Econometric Review 4 (2): 99-122. https://izlik.org/JA23AF26WC.
EndNote
Zaman A (December 1, 2012) Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences. International Econometric Review 4 2 99–122.
IEEE
[1]A. Zaman, “Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences”, IER, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 99–122, Dec. 2012, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA23AF26WC
ISNAD
Zaman, Asad. “Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences”. International Econometric Review 4/2 (December 1, 2012): 99-122. https://izlik.org/JA23AF26WC.
JAMA
1.Zaman A. Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences. IER. 2012;4:99–122.
MLA
Zaman, Asad. “Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences”. International Econometric Review, vol. 4, no. 2, Dec. 2012, pp. 99-122, https://izlik.org/JA23AF26WC.
Vancouver
1.Asad Zaman. Methodological Mistakes and Econometric Consequences. IER [Internet]. 2012 Dec. 1;4(2):99-122. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA23AF26WC