Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models

Volume: 7 Number: 2 September 1, 2015
  • Mahmut Günay
EN

Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models

Abstract

In this paper, we forecast industrial production growth for the Turkish economy using static factor models. We evaluate how the performance of the models change based on the number of factors we extract from our data as well as the level of aggregation for the series in the data set. We consider two evaluation samples for the out-of-sample forecasting exercise to assess the stability of the forecasting performance. We find that the effect of the data set size on the forecasting performance is not independent from the number of factors extracted from this data set. Rankings of the models change in different evaluation samples. We conclude that using a dynamic approach to evaluate models from different dimensions is important in the forecasting process.

Keywords

References

  1. Altug, S. and E. Uluceviz (2013). Identifying Leading Indicators of Real Activity and Inflation for Turkey, 1988-2010: A Pseudo Out-of-Sample Forecasting Approach. OECD Journal: Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis, 2, 1-37.
  2. Angelini, E., M. Banbura and G. Rünstler (2010). Estimating and Forecasting the Euro Area Monthly National Accounts from a Dynamic Factor Model. OECD Journal: Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis, 1, 1-22.
  3. Bai, J. and S. Ng (2002). Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models. Econometrica, 70, 191-221.
  4. Barhoumi, K., O. Darne and L. Ferrara (2010). Are Disaggregate Data Useful for Factor Analysis in Forecasting French GDP? Journal of Forecasting, 29, 132-144.
  5. Barhoumi, K., O. Darne and L. Ferrara (2013). Testing the Number of Factors: An Empirical Assessment for a Forecasting Purpose. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75, 64-79.
  6. Boivin, J. and S. Ng (2005). Understanding and Comparing Factor Based Forecasts. International Journal of Central Banking, 1, 117-151.
  7. Boivin, J. and S. Ng (2006). Are More Data Always Better for Factor Analysis? Journal of Econometrics, 132, 169-194.
  8. Eickmeier, S. and C. Ziegler (2008). How Successful are Dynamic Factor Models at Forecasting Output and Inflation? A Meta-Analytic Approach. Journal of Forecasting, 27, 237-265.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

-

Authors

Mahmut Günay This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2015

Submission Date

September 1, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 7 Number: 2

APA
Günay, M. (2015). Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models. International Econometric Review, 7(2), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.278041
AMA
1.Günay M. Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models. IER. 2015;7(2):64-78. doi:10.33818/ier.278041
Chicago
Günay, Mahmut. 2015. “Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models”. International Econometric Review 7 (2): 64-78. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.278041.
EndNote
Günay M (December 1, 2015) Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models. International Econometric Review 7 2 64–78.
IEEE
[1]M. Günay, “Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models”, IER, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 64–78, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.33818/ier.278041.
ISNAD
Günay, Mahmut. “Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models”. International Econometric Review 7/2 (December 1, 2015): 64-78. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.278041.
JAMA
1.Günay M. Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models. IER. 2015;7:64–78.
MLA
Günay, Mahmut. “Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models”. International Econometric Review, vol. 7, no. 2, Dec. 2015, pp. 64-78, doi:10.33818/ier.278041.
Vancouver
1.Mahmut Günay. Forecasting Turkish Industrial Production Growth With Static Factor Models. IER. 2015 Dec. 1;7(2):64-78. doi:10.33818/ier.278041

Cited By