The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the 'Leverage Effect'

Volume: 8 Number: 1 April 1, 2016
  • Semen Son-turan
EN

The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the 'Leverage Effect'

Abstract

With the advent of the Internet and the availability of user search query data on a broader scale, since the early 2000s researchers have started using collective search query information instead of, or, in addition to, traditional investor sentiment proxies. This study examines whether the leverage (bad news) effect, as measured by the EGARCH (1,1) model, changes with the inclusion of a newly emerging sentiment proxy, internet search volume. The sample consists of 14 US companies belonging to the NASDAQ and NYSE Indices and 501 observations of data collected at weekly frequency spanning a nine year period. Empirical findings suggest that, inclusion of the investor sentiment variable has no clear impact on the bad news effect; there is, however, a discernible increase in volatility persistence. The implications of the findings are that the investor sentiment proxy has additional informational content. Behavioral finance theory and the availability and social proof heuristics serve as potential explanations for such findings.

Keywords

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on
  2. Automatic Control, 19 (6), 716-723. Antweiler, W. and M.Z. Frank (2004). Is all that talk just noise? The information content of internet stock message boards. The Journal of Finance, 59 (3), 1259-1294.
  3. Araghi, M.K. and M.M. Pak (2012). Assessing the Exchange Rate Fluctuation on Tehran's
  4. Stock Market Price: A GARCH Application. International Journal of Management and Business Research (IJMBR), 2(2), 95-107. Askitas, N. and K. Zimmermann (2009). Google econometrics and unemployment forecasting. Applied Economics Quarterly, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 55 (2), 107
  5. Baker, M. and J. Wurgler (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of
  6. Economic Perspectives, 21, 129-152. Bank, M., M. Larch and G. Peter (2011). Google search volume and its influence on liquidity and returns of German stocks. Financial markets and portfolio management, 25 (3), 264.
  7. Barber, B.M. and T. Odean (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2), 785-818.
  8. Barberis, N., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

-

Authors

Semen Son-turan This is me

Publication Date

April 1, 2016

Submission Date

April 1, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 8 Number: 1

APA
Son-turan, S. (2016). The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’. International Econometric Review, 8(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.278043
AMA
1.Son-turan S. The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’. IER. 2016;8(1):4-18. doi:10.33818/ier.278043
Chicago
Son-turan, Semen. 2016. “The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’”. International Econometric Review 8 (1): 4-18. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.278043.
EndNote
Son-turan S (June 1, 2016) The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’. International Econometric Review 8 1 4–18.
IEEE
[1]S. Son-turan, “The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’”, IER, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4–18, June 2016, doi: 10.33818/ier.278043.
ISNAD
Son-turan, Semen. “The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’”. International Econometric Review 8/1 (June 1, 2016): 4-18. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.278043.
JAMA
1.Son-turan S. The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’. IER. 2016;8:4–18.
MLA
Son-turan, Semen. “The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’”. International Econometric Review, vol. 8, no. 1, June 2016, pp. 4-18, doi:10.33818/ier.278043.
Vancouver
1.Semen Son-turan. The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the ’Leverage Effect’. IER. 2016 Jun. 1;8(1):4-18. doi:10.33818/ier.278043

Cited By