Research Article

Cycle Duration in Production with Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey

Volume: 10 Number: 2 September 1, 2018
EN

Cycle Duration in Production with Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey

Abstract

In this paper, the sub-cycles in two economic activity measures are analyzed by using periodogram analyses. Our results from Turkish data suggest that industrial production and capacity utilization rate consist of various cycles including seasonal cycles. These series also have common cycles which correspond about four and seven years. Last, industrial production has also additional cycles compare to capacity utilization ratio cycle.

Keywords

References

  1. Akdi, Y. and D. A. Dickey (1998). Periodograms of unit root time series: distributions and test.Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 27(1), 69-87.
  2. Baxter, M. and R. G. King (1999). Measuring business cycles: approximate band-pass filters foreconomic time series. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 575-593.
  3. Beveridge, S. and C. R. Nelson (1981). A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the ‘business cycle’. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7(2), 151-174.
  4. Brockwell, P. J. and R. A. Davis (1987). Time series: theory and methods. Springer Science & Business Media.
  5. Bry, G. and C. Boschan (1971). Standard business cycle analysis of economic time series.In Cyclical Analysis of Time Series: Selected Procedures and Computer Programs, NBER Books, 64-150.
  6. Burns, A. F. and W. C. Mitchell (1946). Measuring business cycles. NBER Books.
  7. Campbell, J. Y. and N. G. Mankiw (1987). Are output fluctuations transitory?. The Quarterly Journalof Economics, 102(4), 857-880.
  8. Castro, V. (2010). The duration of economic expansions and recessions: More than durationdependence. Journal of Macroeconomics, 32(1), 347-365.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Yilmaz Akdi This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 1, 2018

Submission Date

July 3, 2018

Acceptance Date

November 27, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 10 Number: 2

APA
Akdi, Y., Varlik, S., & Berument, H. (2018). Cycle Duration in Production with Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey. International Econometric Review, 10(2), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.440103
AMA
1.Akdi Y, Varlik S, Berument H. Cycle Duration in Production with Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey. IER. 2018;10(2):24-32. doi:10.33818/ier.440103
Chicago
Akdi, Yilmaz, Serdar Varlik, and Hakan Berument. 2018. “Cycle Duration in Production With Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey”. International Econometric Review 10 (2): 24-32. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.440103.
EndNote
Akdi Y, Varlik S, Berument H (September 1, 2018) Cycle Duration in Production with Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey. International Econometric Review 10 2 24–32.
IEEE
[1]Y. Akdi, S. Varlik, and H. Berument, “Cycle Duration in Production with Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey”, IER, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 24–32, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.33818/ier.440103.
ISNAD
Akdi, Yilmaz - Varlik, Serdar - Berument, Hakan. “Cycle Duration in Production With Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey”. International Econometric Review 10/2 (September 1, 2018): 24-32. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.440103.
JAMA
1.Akdi Y, Varlik S, Berument H. Cycle Duration in Production with Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey. IER. 2018;10:24–32.
MLA
Akdi, Yilmaz, et al. “Cycle Duration in Production With Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey”. International Econometric Review, vol. 10, no. 2, Sept. 2018, pp. 24-32, doi:10.33818/ier.440103.
Vancouver
1.Yilmaz Akdi, Serdar Varlik, Hakan Berument. Cycle Duration in Production with Periodicity – Evidence from Turkey. IER. 2018 Sep. 1;10(2):24-32. doi:10.33818/ier.440103

Cited By