Analyzing Common Market Options in the Scope of OIC

Year 2023, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 28 - 44, 14.03.2024

Cemaleddin Gulenay , İbrahim Güran Yumuşak

https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.1282596

Abstract

This paper initially employs the gravity model in order to analyze the trade data of selected 23 OIC countries and its 4 different subgroups. Then it applies stochastic frontier analysis to the model to gain efficiency scores and uncapped trade potential among countries in order to determine whether the group would have trade creation effect once they go for a Common Market structure. According to the statistical results, the 23 country group gives statistically significant results while deriving a %62 uncapped trade potential among group countries. Additionally, the 13-country subgroup also gives statistically significant results while deriving a %59 uncapped trade potential among them.
While there are a number of studies which applies stochastic frontier analysis to the gravity model and gains efficiency scores, this study is the first to employ the method for OIC countries in order to determine the best possible country group for a Common Market without having trade diversion affect. The purpose of this study is to determine the Common Market options for Turkiye in the scope OIC in order to be a reference point for future Common Market initiatives.

Keywords

gravity model, stochastic frontier analysis, common market, OIC

References

• Abdulghaffar, M. and O. Al-Ubaydli (2013). The Malfunctioning of the Gulf Cooperation Council Single Market: Features, Causes and Remedies. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 54-67.
• Aigner, D., C. Lovell and P. Schmidt (1977). Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics, 21-37.
• Akgül, M.S. (2013). Çekim Modeli Bulguları Işığında Türkiye’nin İslam İşbirliği Teşkilatı İle İlişkileri ve Ticari Potansiyeli. Adam Akademi, 83-110.
• Anderson, J.E. (1979). A Theoretical Foundation for Gravity Equation. American Economic Review, 106-116.
• Anderson, J.E. and E.van Wincoop (2003). Gravity With Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 170-192.
• Armstrong, S.P. (2015). East and South Asia: Managing Difficult Bilateral Relations and Regional Integration Globally. Asian Economic Journal, 303-324.
• Armstrong, S., P. Drysdale and K.Kalirajan (2008). Asian Trade Structures and Trade Potential: An Initial Analysis of South and East Asian Trade. Canberra, Australia.
• Ata, S. (2012). Turkey’s Export Potential: A Gravity Model Analysis. International Conference on Euroasian Economies, (pp. 276-282). Almaty.
• Baldwin, R.E. (1994). Towards an Integrated Europe. London: CEPR.
• Battese, G. and T. Coelli (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 325-332.
• Battese, G. and G. Corra. (1977). Estimation of a Production Frontier Model:With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 169-179.
• Bendjilali, B. (2000). An Intra-Trade Econometric Model for OIC Member Countries: A Cross Country Analysis. Jeddah: The Islamic Research and Teaching Institute (IRTI).
• Bergstrand, J.H. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor- proportions Theory in International Trade’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 53-143.
• Brulhart, M. and M.J. Kelly (1999). ‘Ireland’s Trading Potential with Central and Eastern European Countries: A Gravity Study. Economic and Social Review, 74-159.
• Dayal, R. and N. Dayal (1977). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion : New Concepts , New Methods of Measurement. Review of World Economics, 125-169.
• Deluna, R. and C. Edgardo (2014). Philippine Export Efficiency and Potential: An Application of Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model. World Journal of Economic and Finance, 6-15.
• Demir, M. A.and M. Bilik (2018). Türkiye'nin Ticaret Etkinliği : Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29-48.
• Drysdale, P., Z. Yunling and L. Song (1998). Chinaʹs Trade Efficiency: Measurement and Determinants. In P. Drysdale, Y. Huang, & K. P. Kalirajan, APEC and liberalisation of the Chinese economy (pp. 259-271).
• Egger, P. (2002). An Econometric View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potentials. The World Economy, 297-312.
• Gehrels, F. (1956). Customs Union from a Single-Country Viewpoint. The Review of Economic Studies, 61-64.
• Gencer, A.H.and V. Öngel (2011). Serbest Ticaret Bölgesi Çerçevesinde Türkiye ile Suriye, Ürdün ve Lübnan Arasındaki Potansiyel Dış Ticaret Hacminin Uluslararası Çekim Modeli Yoluyla Tahmini. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 71-94.
• Global Edge. (2019). Retrieved from GCC Statistics: https://globaledge.msu.edu/trade-blocs/gcc/statistics
• Gros, D. and A. Gonciarz (1996). A note on the trade potential of Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Economy, 709-721.
• Hamilton, C.B.and A.L.Winters. (1992). Opening up International Trade with Eastern Europe. Economic Policy, 77-116.
• Hassan, K. and B. Sanchez (2015). The Prospect of An Islamic Common Market. İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Dergisi, 69-113.
• ICDT. (2022). Annual Report On Trade Among The OIC Members States. Ankara: COMCEC.
• Jondrow, J., C. Lovell, I. Materov and P. Schmidt (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 233-238.
• Kalirajan, K. (2007). Regional Cooperation and Bilateral Trade Flows: An Empirical Measurement of Resistance. The International Trade Journal, 85-107.
• Kalirajan, K. and S. Kanhaiya (2008). A Comparative Analysis of China’s and India’s Recent Export Performances. Asian Economic Papers, 1-28.
• Kang, H. and M. Fratianni (2006). International Trade Efficiency, the Gravity Equation, and the Stochastic Frontier. Indiana, USA/IN.
• Karagöz, K. and M. Karagöz (2009). Türkiye’nin Küresel Ticaret Potansiyeli: Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 127-144.
• Kodde, D.A. and F.C. Palm (1986). Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restrictions. Journal of the Econometric Society, 1243-1248.
• Kumbhakar, S. C. and H.J. Wang, (2010). Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in Production Frontier Models Using Cross- Sectional Data. Indian Economic Review, 7-77.
• Lipsey, R.G. (1960). The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey. The Economic Journal, 496-513.
• Meade, J.E. (1956). The Theory of Customs Unions. The Economic Journal, 337-339.
• Nilsson, L. (2000). Trade integration and the EU economic membership criteria. European Journal of Political Economy, 807-827.
• Pitt, M.and L. Lee (1981). The Measurement and Sources of Technical Efficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry. Journal of Development Economics, 43-64.
• Poyhonen, P. (1963). A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 93-100.
• Ravishankar, G. and M.M. Stack (2014). The Gravity Model and Trade Efficiency: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Eastern European Countries’ Potential Trade. The World Economy, 690-704.
• Santos Silva, J. and T. Silvana (2006). The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 641-658. Schmidt, P. and R. Sickles (1984). Production Frontiers and Panel Data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 367-374.
• Tatlıcı, Ö. and A. Kızıltan (2011). Çekim Modeli: Türkiye’nin İhracatı Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 287-299.
• Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
• Viego, V. and V. Corbella (2017). Specialization and Exports in South America after Trade Agreements. Journal of Economic Integration, 433-487.
• Viner, J. (1950). The Economics of Customs Unions. In J. Viner, The Customs Union Issue (pp. 51-102). WITS. (1992). Retrieved from Wordl Integrated Trade Solution: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/DEU/Year/1992/Summary WITS. (2018). Retrieved from World Integrated Trade Solutions: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/DEU/Year/2018/Summary