The Effectiveness of Antiseptic Applications in Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Approach

Abstract

Introduction Surgical procedures carry a high risk of surgical site infections (SSIs), which can increase morbidity, mortality, and costs. Antiseptics play a fundamental role in infection control by reducing the microbial load on the surgical site. Development This review systematically evaluates the efficacy of the main antiseptic agents used in surgical procedures (alcohol-based solutions, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and some combined formulations) in preventing SSI, their safety profile, and clinical implications. Evidence-based studies show that the choice of antiseptic yields varying results depending on the formulation, concentration, and application technique. Randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses provide stronger evidence that chlorhexidine-alcohol combinations, in particular, reduce infection rates in some situations; observational studies emphasise that adherence to protocols (training, standard processes, team coordination) in real-life settings significantly affects outcomes. WHO guidelines recommend the appropriate use of antiseptics in preoperative skin preparation and hand hygiene as a fundamental safety measure. Conclusion General evidence indicates that antiseptics can significantly reduce the risk of surgical site infection when the correct agent is selected and applied in a standardised manner. However, side effects such as allergies/irritation and compliance with application must be taken into account; the use of antiseptics should be addressed holistically, alongside sterilisation and general infection control measures.

Keywords

• Surgical site infection
• antiseptic
• chlorhexidine
• povidone-iodine
• alcohol-based solution

Cerrahi Girişimlerde Antiseptik Uygulamalarının Etkinliği: Sistematik Bir Yaklaşım

Öz

Giriş Cerrahi girişimler, cerrahi alan enfeksiyonları (CAE) açısından yüksek risk taşır ve bu enfeksiyonlar morbidite, mortalite ve maliyetleri artırabilir. Antiseptikler, cerrahi alanın mikrobiyal yükünü azaltarak enfeksiyon kontrolünde temel bir yer tutar. Gelişme Bu derleme, cerrahi girişimlerde kullanılan başlıca antiseptik ajanların (alkol bazlı çözeltiler, povidon-iyot, klorheksidin ve bazı kombine formülasyonlar) CAE’yi önlemedeki etkinliğini, güvenlilik profilini ve klinik yansımalarını sistematik bir yaklaşımla değerlendirmektedir. Kanıta dayalı çalışmalar; antiseptik seçiminin formülasyon, konsantrasyon ve uygulama tekniğine bağlı olarak değişen sonuçlar doğurduğunu göstermektedir. Randomize kontrollü çalışmalar ve meta-analizler, özellikle klorheksidin–alkol kombinasyonlarının bazı durumlarda enfeksiyon oranlarını azaltmada daha güçlü kanıtlar sunduğunu; gözlemsel çalışmalar ise gerçek yaşamda protokollere uyumun (eğitim, standart süreçler, ekip koordinasyonu) sonuçları belirgin biçimde etkilediğini vurgulamaktadır. WHO rehberleri, cerrahi öncesi cilt hazırlığı ve el hijyeninde uygun antiseptik kullanımını temel bir güvenlik adımı olarak önermektedir. Sonuç Genel kanıtlar, antiseptiklerin doğru ajan seçimi ve standardize uygulama ile CAE riskini anlamlı düzeyde azaltabildiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bununla birlikte, alerji/tahriş gibi yan etkiler ve uygulama uyumu dikkate alınmalı; antiseptik kullanımı, sterilizasyon ve genel enfeksiyon kontrol önlemleriyle bütüncül biçimde ele alınmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cerrahi alan enfeksiyonu
• antiseptik
• klorheksidin
• povidon-iyot
• alkol bazlı solüsyon

References

1. Barker, L. K., Schneider, A. M., & Xu, M. (2017). Enhancing safety through infection prevention best practices: A strategy for effective perioperative care. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 32(4), 456–464.
2. Chowdhury, P. (2020). The efficacy of Betadine as an antiseptic agent: A review. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 13(5), 760–763.
3. Clarke, R. S., Hainsworth, S. R., & Shadbolt, C. D. (2015). Antisepsis in surgical practice. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 108(10), 398–402.
4. Dükkancı, K. (2021). Comparison of antibacterial effects of chlorhexidine and iodine based antiseptics. BMC Infectious Diseases, 21(1), 1–9.
5. Fitzgerald, J. (2018). Antisepsis in the modern surgical environment. Surgical Infections, 19(5), 511–520.
6. Friedman, M., Arjmand, E., & Makkar, P. (2020). Effectiveness of antiseptic solutions on surgical site infection rates: A systematic review. Surgical Infections, 21(3), 233–243.
7. Gould, D. J., Moralejo, D., Drey, N. S., & Chudleigh, J. (2010). Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9).
8. Gul, B., Yilmaz, S., & Kaplan, I. (2015). Infection control in surgery: A comprehensive approach. International Journal of Surgery, 21, 184–188.

9. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration.
10. Hoffman, P., Porr, K., & Lee, C. (2020). The role of antiseptics in preventing surgical site infections: A focus on the clinical application. Journal of Hospital Infection, 106(2), 13–19.
11. Holmes, N. (2018). Infection prevention and control. Journal of Hospital Infection, 98(2), 171–178.
12. Horan, T. C., Andrus, M., & Dudeck, M. A. (2008). CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care–associated infection. American Journal of Infection Control, 36(5), 309–332.
13. Huang, M., Kuo, M., Chen, C., & Chang, C. (2006). Risk factors for postoperative infections in open heart surgery. American Journal of Infection Control, 34(1), 27–30.
14. Hübner, N. O., Butters, P., & Hübner, C. (2020). Antiseptics and their impact on health care-acquired infections. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 41(7), 853–858.
15. Inoue, Y., Yoneyama, T., Yamamoto, T., & Koizumi, D. (2017). The effectiveness of antiseptics in preventing surgical site infections. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 38(5), 616–620.
16. Kampf, G., & Saglik, M. L. (2020). Antiseptic effectiveness in surgical infection prevention. Journal of Clinical Hygiene, 35(3), 205–215.
17. Kampf, G., & Santos, A. C. (2013). The influence of antiseptic hand rubs on the skin barrier: A review. Journal of Hospital Infection, 85(4), 275–281.
18. Kampf, G., & Sessler, C. (2013). The role of antiseptics in infection control in surgical settings. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 41(4), 256–265.
19. Kampf, G., Todt, D., Pfaender, S., & Steinmann, J. (2016). Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. Journal of Hospital Infection, 104(3), 246–251.
20. Kirkland, L. T., & McCulloh, R. J. (2013). Surgical site infections: Epidemiology and prevention. Journal of Hospital Infection, 84(3), 213–218.
21. Kumar, S., Verma, K., & Bhatia, N. (2014). Antiseptics: An overview of benefits and risks. International Journal of Pathology, 2(1), 31–35.
22. Lam, Y. M., & Hsu, Y. (2018). Efficacy of antiseptic agents in surgical site infections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Surgery, 45(3), 123–130.
23. Mackintosh, J. (2020). The role of antiseptics in infection control. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 70(3), 451–459.
24. McLaws, M. L., Berry, G., & Gilmour, T. (2009). Effectiveness of alcohol-based hand antiseptics in healthcare. Journal of Hospital Infection, 73(2), 110–112.
25. Niemann, T., Bronnimann, M., & Bock, M. (2020). Hydrogen peroxide applications as antiseptics in surgery: A review. International Journal of Surgery, 80, 122–128.
26. O’Hara, G., Sage, W., & Burns, P. (2020). The importance of antiseptics in a time of antibiotic resistance: A call to action. Healthcare, 8(4), 523.
27. Parikh, K., Cohen, S., & Sandhu, A. (2018). Surgical infection prevention: An integrated approach. American Journal of Surgery, 215(1), 12–18.
28. Pittet, D., & Boyce, J. M. (2001). Guidelines for hand hygiene in health care settings. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51(RR-16), 1–45.
29. Pittet, D., Allegranzi, B., & Boyce, J. M. (2006). The WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 11(6), 300–302.
30. Pittet, D., Hugonnet, S., Mourouga, P., & Sauvan, V. (2000). Effectiveness of a hospital-wide hand hygiene promotion program. The Lancet, 356(9238), 1307–1312.
31. Ranjan, R., Gupta, A., & Ahmad, S. (2019). Antimicrobial efficacy of hydrogen peroxide against MRSA. Surgical Infections, 20(7), 573–579.
32. Rutala, W. A., & Weber, D. J. (2019). Disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 40(5), 460–465.
33. Searle, M., & Gabel, D. (2017). Surgical hand antisepsis: A review of recent studies. Journal of Surgical Research, 214, 237–243.
34. Sharma, A., Khokhar, A., & Saha, S. (2020). Antiseptics in surgical practice: A review. Indian Journal of Surgery, 82(2), 133–140.
35. Sutton, R. C., Gregory, S. M., & Jones, D. H. (2015). Infection control practices and surgical outcomes. International Journal of Surgery, 23(1), 52–58.
36. Weiser, T. G., Haynes, A. B., Dziekan, G., et al. (2016). Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(3), 229–237.
37. Wenzel, R. P., & Edmond, M. B. (2003). Impact of infection control on surgical site infections. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 111(9), 1345–1350.
38. World Health Organization. (2009, May). WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care.  World Health Organization. (2016). Global guidelines on the prevention of surgical site infection.
39. World Health Organization. (2019). WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: A summary.
40. World Health Organization. (2020, May). WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care.