As the leading actor of the Democratic Left movement, Bülent Ecevit emerged in the Republican People’s Party (CHP). Firstly, he became the leader of the CHP and then came to power in the Republic of Turkey in a short time. However, his power struggles both within his party and in Turkey was formidable. The first protuberant in his way through accessing the power was a historical personality, that is İsmet İnönü. He was the leader of the CHP when Ecevit initiated the challenge. This paper aimed to analyse the elements of Ecevit’s ideological discourse in the 1970s within the confines of arguments concerning Mithat Paşaa, Kemalism, and Marxism. In the first part, the contribution of Mithat Paşa, a moderniser in the Ottoman Empire during Abdulhamid II’s reign, to Ecevit’s movement was evaluated. Then, the relationship between Kemalism and Ecevit’s Democratic Left was discussed. In the last part, the differences and similarities between Ecevit’s leftist outlook and Marxism were identified. In the conclusion part, there was a general assessment of Ecevit and his discourse.
As the leading actor of the Democratic Left movement, Bülent Ecevit emerged in the Republican People’s Party (CHP). Firstly, he became the leader of the CHP and then came to power in the Republic of Turkey in a short time. However, his power struggles both within his party and in Turkey was formidable. The first protuberant in his way through accessing the power was a historical personality, that is İsmet İnönü. He was the leader of the CHP when Ecevit initiated the challenge. This paper aimed to analyse the elements of Ecevit’s ideological discourse in the 1970s within the confines of arguments concerning Mithat Paşaa, Kemalism, and Marxism. In the first part, the contribution of Mithat Paşa, a moderniser in the Ottoman Empire during Abdulhamid II’s reign, to Ecevit’s movement was evaluated. Then, the relationship between Kemalism and Ecevit’s Democratic Left was discussed. In the last part, the differences and similarities between Ecevit’s leftist outlook and Marxism were identified. In the conclusion part, there was a general assessment of Ecevit and his discourse.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Political Science |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 31, 2017 |
Submission Date | September 11, 2017 |
Published in Issue | Year 2017 Issue: 2 |
Title of the Journal in Turkish: Iğdır Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Title of the Journal in English: Iğdır University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences
Abbreviated Title of the Journal: Iğdır iibf dergisi