BibTex RIS Cite

Eleştirel Söylem Analizi ve Sosyal Medya: Eleştirel Söylem Analizi Çalışmalarında Yeni Yaklaşımlar

Year 2019, Issue: 18, 193 - 210, 01.04.2019

Abstract

Bu çalışmada sosyal bilimlerde sıklıkla kullanılan bir yöntem olan Eleştirel Söylem Analizi CDA yaklaşımının farklı boyutları konu edinilmektedir. Söylem analizi metodu, süreç içerisinde ortaya çıkan farklı yaklaşımlarla birlikte ele alınmakta ve bu yaklaşımların birbirlerinden hangi noktalarda ayrıştıkları üzerinde durulmaktadır. Söylem analizinin tek bir yaklaşıma indirgenememesine rağmen birçok ortak nokta üzerinden analizlerini gerçekleştirdiği ortaya koyulmaktadır. Çalışmanın temel sorunsalı söylem analizi yaklaşımlarının sosyal medya ortamlarında üretilen içerikleri nasıl ve ne ölçüde analiz edebileceğidir. Sosyal medya incelemelerinde CDA yaklaşımı kullanılabilir mi? Yeni iletişim teknolojileri üzerinden dolayımlanan içerik ve söylem bu teknolojilerden ne ölçüde etkilenmektedir? Yeni internet teknolojileriyle birlikte ortaya çıkan sosyolojik bağlamın toplumsal alanda paradigmal bir dönüşümü beraberinde getirdiği çalışmanın ana argümanıdır. Bu tür bir paradigmal değişiminden hareketle soruların sorulduğu çalışmada, söylem analizi alanına katkı sunan isimlere değinilmekte ve sosyal medya ortamlarına söz konusu metodun uyarlanması gerektiğini ifade eden Majid Khosravinik’in ortaya koyduğu yaklaşımlardan yararlanılmaktadır.

References

  • Albert, Connie and A. F. Salam. “Critical Discourse Analysis: Toward Theories in Social Media”, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Ameri- cas Conference on Information Systems. August 15-17, 2013.
  • Androutsopoulos, Jannis. “Computer-Mediated Communication and Linguistic Landscapes”, in Janet Holmes and Kirk Hazen (Ed.), Research Methods in Sociolinguistic: A Practical Guide (74-90), Wiley- Blackwell, 2013
  • Balcı, Ali. “Michel Foucault’da Metod: Arkeoloji, Soybilim ve Etik”. International Journal of Political Studies Volume: 1, No: 1 (2015): p. 27.
  • Bouvier, Gwen and David Machin. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Challenges And Opportunities of Social Media”. Revıew of Communication. 18/3 (2018): 178–192.
  • Fairclough, Norman. “CDA as Dialectial Reasoning”, The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson (Ed.).Routledge Handbooks (2018): p. 13.
  • Fairclough, Norman. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in So- cial Scientific Research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Ruth Wodak and Micheal Meyer. London: Sage Publications, 2002, p. 1- 3.
  • Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Londra: Longman, 1995.
  • Forchtner, Bernhard. “Critique, The Discourse-Historical Approach, And The Frankfurt School.” Critical Discourse Studies. 8:1 (2011): 1- 14.
  • Foucault, Michel. The Archeology of Knowledge. Routledge. 2002.
  • Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, Newyork University, 2008.
  • Keskin, Ferda. Söylem, Arkeoloji ve İktidar. Doğu Batı, 1999.
  • Koshravinik, Majid and Nadia Sarkhoh. “Arabism and Anti-Persian Sentiments on Participatory Web Platforms: A Social Media Criti- cal Discourse Study”. International Journal of Communication, Vo- lume: 11 (2017): p. 36-115.
  • Khosravinik, Majid. “Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM- CDS) , Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis. Ed. John Flowerdew and John Richardson. London: Routledge, p. 582-596.
  • Khosravinik, Majid. “Social Media Discourse and Echo Chambers”. Insight Turkey, Vol. 19/3 (2017): p. 53-68.
  • Kress, Gunther. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual Review of App- lied Linguistics, Volume: 11, (March 1990).
  • Said, Edward. Michel Foucault: 1926-1984. Translation., Özgür Emir. Doğu Batı, 1999.
  • Seargeant, Philip and Caroline Tagg. The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
  • Herring and Jannis Androutsopoulos, Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. The handbook of discourse analysis, D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Second Edition, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 2015.
  • Urquhart, Cathy and Emmanuelle Vaast. “Building Social Media The- ory From Case Studies: A New Frontier for is Research. Thirty In- ternational Conference on Information Systems. Orlando. (2012): p. 2- 4.
  • Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer. “Critical Discourse Analysis: His- tory, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology”. Methods of Critical Dis- course Analysis. London: Sage Publications, 2009.
  • Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer. Methods for Critical Discourse Analy- sis, 2. Basım, SAGE, 2009.
  • Wodak, Ruth. “What CDA is about- a Summary of its History, Impor- tant Concepts and Its Developments. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Ruth Wodak ve Micheal Meyer. London: Sage Publicati- ons, 2002, p. 1-3.
  • Yetim, Mustafa ve Ramazan Erdağ. “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Eleştirel Söylem Analizi: Revizyonist Söylemin Gelişimi”. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Volume: 5, No: 1 (April 2018): p. 79-100.

Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Media: New Apporoaches in Critical Discourse Analysis Studies

Year 2019, Issue: 18, 193 - 210, 01.04.2019

Abstract

This study seeks to examine different dimensions of Critical Discourse Analysis CDA , which is frequently used in social sciences. The method of discourse analysis is discussed together with the different approaches that emerged in the process and the article underlines the points of divergence between the different approaches. While discourse analysis cannot be reduced to a single approach, it conducts its analyses on many common points. The main issue tackled in the article is how discourse analysis approaches and analyzes content produced within social media environments. Can CDA be used when examining social media? To what extent are content and discourse mediated through new communication channels affected by these technologies? The paradigmatic transformation of sociological context, which emerged with new internet technologies, is the main area of this study. Questions in this study are posted within this paradigmatic transformation and by giving reference to names that contributed to discourse analysis, this study adopts the view put forward by Majid Khosravinik that discourse analysis should be used within social media environments.

References

  • Albert, Connie and A. F. Salam. “Critical Discourse Analysis: Toward Theories in Social Media”, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Ameri- cas Conference on Information Systems. August 15-17, 2013.
  • Androutsopoulos, Jannis. “Computer-Mediated Communication and Linguistic Landscapes”, in Janet Holmes and Kirk Hazen (Ed.), Research Methods in Sociolinguistic: A Practical Guide (74-90), Wiley- Blackwell, 2013
  • Balcı, Ali. “Michel Foucault’da Metod: Arkeoloji, Soybilim ve Etik”. International Journal of Political Studies Volume: 1, No: 1 (2015): p. 27.
  • Bouvier, Gwen and David Machin. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Challenges And Opportunities of Social Media”. Revıew of Communication. 18/3 (2018): 178–192.
  • Fairclough, Norman. “CDA as Dialectial Reasoning”, The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson (Ed.).Routledge Handbooks (2018): p. 13.
  • Fairclough, Norman. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in So- cial Scientific Research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Ruth Wodak and Micheal Meyer. London: Sage Publications, 2002, p. 1- 3.
  • Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Londra: Longman, 1995.
  • Forchtner, Bernhard. “Critique, The Discourse-Historical Approach, And The Frankfurt School.” Critical Discourse Studies. 8:1 (2011): 1- 14.
  • Foucault, Michel. The Archeology of Knowledge. Routledge. 2002.
  • Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, Newyork University, 2008.
  • Keskin, Ferda. Söylem, Arkeoloji ve İktidar. Doğu Batı, 1999.
  • Koshravinik, Majid and Nadia Sarkhoh. “Arabism and Anti-Persian Sentiments on Participatory Web Platforms: A Social Media Criti- cal Discourse Study”. International Journal of Communication, Vo- lume: 11 (2017): p. 36-115.
  • Khosravinik, Majid. “Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM- CDS) , Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis. Ed. John Flowerdew and John Richardson. London: Routledge, p. 582-596.
  • Khosravinik, Majid. “Social Media Discourse and Echo Chambers”. Insight Turkey, Vol. 19/3 (2017): p. 53-68.
  • Kress, Gunther. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual Review of App- lied Linguistics, Volume: 11, (March 1990).
  • Said, Edward. Michel Foucault: 1926-1984. Translation., Özgür Emir. Doğu Batı, 1999.
  • Seargeant, Philip and Caroline Tagg. The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
  • Herring and Jannis Androutsopoulos, Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. The handbook of discourse analysis, D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Second Edition, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 2015.
  • Urquhart, Cathy and Emmanuelle Vaast. “Building Social Media The- ory From Case Studies: A New Frontier for is Research. Thirty In- ternational Conference on Information Systems. Orlando. (2012): p. 2- 4.
  • Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer. “Critical Discourse Analysis: His- tory, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology”. Methods of Critical Dis- course Analysis. London: Sage Publications, 2009.
  • Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer. Methods for Critical Discourse Analy- sis, 2. Basım, SAGE, 2009.
  • Wodak, Ruth. “What CDA is about- a Summary of its History, Impor- tant Concepts and Its Developments. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Ruth Wodak ve Micheal Meyer. London: Sage Publicati- ons, 2002, p. 1-3.
  • Yetim, Mustafa ve Ramazan Erdağ. “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Eleştirel Söylem Analizi: Revizyonist Söylemin Gelişimi”. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Volume: 5, No: 1 (April 2018): p. 79-100.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Turgay Yerlikaya This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Issue: 18

Cite

APA Yerlikaya, T. (2019). Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Media: New Apporoaches in Critical Discourse Analysis Studies. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(18), 193-210.