Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM

Year 2019, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 204 - 211, 31.12.2019

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is one of the
commonly used additive manufacturing methods to produce quality products with
low cost complex geometries with efficient manufacturing and delivery
logistics. Mechanical properties can be improved by examining numerous FDM
parameters and/or using new materials through this method. In this study,
mathematical models have been developed for estimation of some mechanical
properties of parts produced by using PLA+ plastic material by FDM method. For
this purpose, standard tensile and bending test samples were produced with 3D
printer at three different printing speeds and filling ratio with two different
raster angles. The effects of process parameters on tensile and bending
strength were analyzed experimentally and statistically. According to the
experimental results, the importance order of the parameters for mechanical
properties of PLA+ based samples were determined as filling ratio, raster angle
and printing speed. Tensile and bending strengths were higher in samples
produced at 0/90° raster angle. On the other hand, it was determined that the
increase in the printing speed decreased the tensile and bending strength
proportionally. Between the results obtained from the mathematical models
developed with multiple regression analysis and experimental results, an
average deviation of 3% for tensile strength and 2% for bending strength were
found.

References

  • 1. Dizon, J.R.C., Espera, A.H., Chen, Q., Advincula, R.C., “Mechanical characterization of 3d-printed polymers”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol 20, Pages 44–67, 2018.
  • 2. Lee, J.Y., An, J., Chua, C.K., “Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials”, Applied Materials Today, Vol 7, Pages 120–133, 2017.
  • 3. Mohamed, O.A., Masood, S.H., Jahar L.B., "Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects", Advances in Manufacturing, Vol 3, Pages 42-53, 2015.
  • 4. Turner, B.N., Strong, R., Gold, S.A., “A Review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. process design and modeling”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol 20, Issue 3, Pages 192-204, 2014.
  • 5. Casavola, C., Cazzato, A., Moramarco, V., Pappalettere, C. “Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory”, Material and Design, Vol 90, Pages 453–458, 2016.
  • 6. Rankouhi, B., Javadpour, S., Delfanian, F., Letcher, T., “Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3d printed abs respect to later thickness and orientation”, J. Fail. Anal. Prev., Vol 16, Pages 467–481, 2016.
  • 7. Domingo, M., Puigriol, J.M., Garcia, A.A., Lluma, J., Borros, S., Reyes, G., “Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate parts”, Material and Design, Vol 83, Pages 670–677, 2015.
  • 8. Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S., “Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts”, Material and Design, Vol 31, Pages 287–295, 2010.9. Arivazhagan, A., Masood, S.H., “Dynamic mechanical properties of ABS material processed by fused deposition modelling. Int J Eng Res Appl., Vol 2(3), Pages 2009–2014, 2012.
  • 10. Evlen, H., Erel, G., Yılmaz, E., “Açık ve kapalı sistemlerde doluluk oranının parça mukavemetine etkisinin incelenmesi”, Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt 21, Sayı 3, Sayfa 651-662, 2018.
  • 11. Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., Marinescu, R., “FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review”, Polymer Testing, Vol 69, Pages 157– 166, 2018.
  • 12. Vaezi, M., Chua, C.K., “Effects of layer thickness and binder saturation level parameters on 3D printing process”, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol 53, Pages 275–284, 2011.
  • 13. ESUN, http://www.esun3d.net/products/142.html (2018.02.02), 2018.
  • 14. Günay, M., Gündüz, S., Yılmaz, H., Yaşar, N., Kaçar, R., “Optimization of 3D printing operation parameters for tensile strength in PLA based sample”, Journal of Polytechnic, 2019.
  • 15. Ahn, S. H., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., “Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol 8, Issue 4, Pages 248–257, 2002.
  • 16. Chacon, J. M., Caminero, M. A., Garcia-Plaza, E., Nunez, P. J., “Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection”, Material and Design, Vol 124, Pages 143–157, 2017.
  • 17. Aydın, M., Yıldırım, F., Çantı, E., “Farklı yazdırma parametrelerinde PLA filamentin işlem performansının incelenmesi”, International Journal Of 3D Printing Technologies And Digital Industry, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, Sayfa 102-115, 2019.
  • 18. Wu, W., Geng, P., Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H., Zhao, J., “Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS”, Materials, Vol 8, Pages 5834–5846, 2015.

MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM

Year 2019, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 204 - 211, 31.12.2019

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is one of the
commonly used additive manufacturing methods to produce quality products with
low cost complex geometries with efficient manufacturing and delivery
logistics. Mechanical properties can be improved by examining numerous FDM
parameters and/or using new materials through this method. In this study,
mathematical models have been developed for estimation of some mechanical
properties of parts produced by using PLA+ plastic material by FDM method. For
this purpose, standard tensile and bending test samples were produced with 3D
printer at three different printing speeds and filling ratio with two different
raster angles. The effects of process parameters on tensile and bending
strength were analyzed experimentally and statistically. According to the
experimental results, the importance order of the parameters for mechanical
properties of PLA+ based samples were determined as filling ratio, raster angle
and printing speed. Tensile and bending strengths were higher in samples
produced at 0/90° raster angle. On the other hand, it was determined that the
increase in the printing speed decreased the tensile and bending strength
proportionally. Between the results obtained from the mathematical models
developed with multiple regression analysis and experimental results, an
average deviation of 3% for tensile strength and 2% for bending strength were
found.

References

  • 1. Dizon, J.R.C., Espera, A.H., Chen, Q., Advincula, R.C., “Mechanical characterization of 3d-printed polymers”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol 20, Pages 44–67, 2018.
  • 2. Lee, J.Y., An, J., Chua, C.K., “Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials”, Applied Materials Today, Vol 7, Pages 120–133, 2017.
  • 3. Mohamed, O.A., Masood, S.H., Jahar L.B., "Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects", Advances in Manufacturing, Vol 3, Pages 42-53, 2015.
  • 4. Turner, B.N., Strong, R., Gold, S.A., “A Review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. process design and modeling”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol 20, Issue 3, Pages 192-204, 2014.
  • 5. Casavola, C., Cazzato, A., Moramarco, V., Pappalettere, C. “Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory”, Material and Design, Vol 90, Pages 453–458, 2016.
  • 6. Rankouhi, B., Javadpour, S., Delfanian, F., Letcher, T., “Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3d printed abs respect to later thickness and orientation”, J. Fail. Anal. Prev., Vol 16, Pages 467–481, 2016.
  • 7. Domingo, M., Puigriol, J.M., Garcia, A.A., Lluma, J., Borros, S., Reyes, G., “Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate parts”, Material and Design, Vol 83, Pages 670–677, 2015.
  • 8. Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S., “Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts”, Material and Design, Vol 31, Pages 287–295, 2010.9. Arivazhagan, A., Masood, S.H., “Dynamic mechanical properties of ABS material processed by fused deposition modelling. Int J Eng Res Appl., Vol 2(3), Pages 2009–2014, 2012.
  • 10. Evlen, H., Erel, G., Yılmaz, E., “Açık ve kapalı sistemlerde doluluk oranının parça mukavemetine etkisinin incelenmesi”, Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt 21, Sayı 3, Sayfa 651-662, 2018.
  • 11. Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., Marinescu, R., “FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review”, Polymer Testing, Vol 69, Pages 157– 166, 2018.
  • 12. Vaezi, M., Chua, C.K., “Effects of layer thickness and binder saturation level parameters on 3D printing process”, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol 53, Pages 275–284, 2011.
  • 13. ESUN, http://www.esun3d.net/products/142.html (2018.02.02), 2018.
  • 14. Günay, M., Gündüz, S., Yılmaz, H., Yaşar, N., Kaçar, R., “Optimization of 3D printing operation parameters for tensile strength in PLA based sample”, Journal of Polytechnic, 2019.
  • 15. Ahn, S. H., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., “Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol 8, Issue 4, Pages 248–257, 2002.
  • 16. Chacon, J. M., Caminero, M. A., Garcia-Plaza, E., Nunez, P. J., “Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection”, Material and Design, Vol 124, Pages 143–157, 2017.
  • 17. Aydın, M., Yıldırım, F., Çantı, E., “Farklı yazdırma parametrelerinde PLA filamentin işlem performansının incelenmesi”, International Journal Of 3D Printing Technologies And Digital Industry, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, Sayfa 102-115, 2019.
  • 18. Wu, W., Geng, P., Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H., Zhao, J., “Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS”, Materials, Vol 8, Pages 5834–5846, 2015.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Mechanical Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mustafa Günay 0000-0002-1281-1359

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Submission Date September 23, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 3 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Günay, M. (2019). MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 3(3), 204-211.
AMA Günay M. MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM. IJ3DPTDI. December 2019;3(3):204-211.
Chicago Günay, Mustafa. “MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM”. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry 3, no. 3 (December 2019): 204-11.
EndNote Günay M (December 1, 2019) MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry 3 3 204–211.
IEEE M. Günay, “MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM”, IJ3DPTDI, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 204–211, 2019.
ISNAD Günay, Mustafa. “MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM”. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry 3/3 (December 2019), 204-211.
JAMA Günay M. MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM. IJ3DPTDI. 2019;3:204–211.
MLA Günay, Mustafa. “MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM”. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, vol. 3, no. 3, 2019, pp. 204-11.
Vancouver Günay M. MODELING OF TENSILE AND BENDING STRENGTH FOR PLA PARTS PRODUCED BY FDM. IJ3DPTDI. 2019;3(3):204-11.

download

International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry is lisenced under Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı