INFLUENCED OF BOTTOM HEAT TREATMENT AND TYPES OF CUTTING ON THE REGENERATION OF EUGENIA (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) STEM CUTTINGS

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 66 - 74, 08.12.2018

Derby Polıquıt , Arsenio Ramos

Abstract

Eugenia (Eugenia
myrtofolia L.) is one of the most demanded ornamental plant in landscaping
industry but the availability of planting material of this plant is limited due
to its difficulty in propagating by stem cutting. Thus, this study was
conducted to: (1) determine the influence of bottom heat on the regeneration of
Eugenia stem cuttings; (2) determine the influence of type of cutting on the
regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings; and (3) evaluate the interaction effect
of the type of cutting and bottom heat application on the regeneration of
Eugenia stem cuttings. This was conducted at NwSSU of San Jorge Campus, San
Jorge, Samar. The experiment was laid-out in 2 x 3 factorial in split-plot
arranged in RCBD with three replications. The rooting medium temperature
manipulation (B1- with bottom heat and B2- without bottom heat) was assigned in
the Main-plot while type of cuttings (T1-with no axillary shoot, T2- with
single axillary shoot, and T3- with two axillary shoot) in the sub-plot.
Regardless of the type of cuttings, bottom heat application did not significantly influenced all cutting
regeneration parameters evaluated but significantly affected some  horticultural characteristics of the
successfully regenerated cutting 30 days after potting. Application of bottom
heat significantly promoted shoot production both in terms of number of shoot
and size of leaves of successfully regenerated cuttings. The type of cutting
significantly affected the percent leaf retention and rooting. Cuttings without
axillary shoot retained more leaves and gave higher rooting percentage than
cuttings with 2 axillary shoots. Successfully regenerated cuttings with 1 and 2
axillary shoots retained had bigger leaves 30 days after potting than cuttings
without axillary shoot. There was no significant interaction effect of rooting
medium temperature manipulation and type of cuttings on the regeneration of
Eugenia stem cuttings and the performance of regenerated cuttings after potting 

Keywords

Eugenia myrtifolia, stem cuttings, bottom heat, type of cuttings

References

• AMINAH, H. 1997. Influence of irradiance on water relations and carbon flux during rooting of Sorea leprosula leafy stem cuttings. Tree Physiol 17: 445-452.
• CAMERON, R. W., R. S. HARRISON- MURRAY, K. CAMPFORT, K. KESTERS and L. J. KNIGHT. 2005. The influence of branches and leaf area on rooting and development of Contnus coggygria cv. Royal Purple cuttings. Annals of Applied Biology. Int. Journal. Retrieved from: https;//doi. Org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00392.
• CHONG, C. 2003. Influence of bottom heat and mulch on rooting of evergreeens cuttings. Combined Proceedings International Plant propagators Society. Volume53. P. 496-499.
• COSTA, J. M. 2002. The role of leaf in growth dynamic and rooting of leafy stem cuttings of rose. Thesis of Wageningen University. ISBN 5808-687-9.
• DAVIS, T. D. and , J. R. POTTER.1981. Current photosynthate as a limiting factor in adventitious root formation in leay cuttings. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 106, 278-282.
• DAVIS, T. D. and , J. R. POTTER.1989. Relations between carbohydrate, water status and adventitious root formation in leafy pea cuttings rooted under various levels of atmospheric CO2 and relative humidity. Physiol Plant 77:185-190
• DE BONA, C. M. and L.A. BIASI. 2010. Influence of leaf retention on cutting propagation of Lavandula dentata L. Rev. Ceres vol.57 no.4 Viçosa.
• DYKEMAN, B. 1976. Temperature relationship in root initiation and development of cuttings. Comb. Proc. Intl. Plant. Prop. Soc. 26:201-207.
• GRANGE, R. and K. LOACH. 1983. Environmental factors affecting water loss from leafy cuttings in different propagation systems. J. Hort. Sci. 58:1-7.
• HAISSIG, B.E. and H. T. DAVIS. 1986. Metabolic processes in the adventitious rooting of cuttings. In: MB Jackson (ed) New root formation in plants and cuttings. Long Ashton Research Station of Bristol, UK. Pp.141-19086
• HARTMANN, H. T., D.E. KESTER, and F. T. DAVIES. 1990. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. 6th ed. Prentice Hall Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A.
• HARTMANN, H. T., D.E. KESTER, and F. T. DAVIES. 1997. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. 7th ed. Prentice Hall Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A.
• HARTMANN, H. T., D.E. KESTER, and F. T. DAVIES. 2011. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. 8th ed. Prentice Hall Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A.
• HUNTER, S. L, F.A. BLAZICH, T.G. RANNEY, and S. L. WARREN. 1997. Propagation of Carolina sapphire smooth Arizona cypress’ by stem cuttings: effects of growth stage, type of cutting, and IBA treatment. J. Environ. Hort. Science. 130; 295-301.
• KESTER, D. E. 1970. Temperature and propagation. Comb. Proc. Intl. Plant. Prop. Soc. 20:153-63.
• LEBRUN, R. R. and A. N. TOUSSAINT, and J. ROGGEMANS. 1998. Description of Syzgium paniculatum Gaertn. ‘ Vaerlaine’ and its propagation by stem cuttings. Scientia Horticulturae, 75: 103-111.
• LOACH, K.1988. Water relations and adventitious rooting. In; TD Davies. BE Haiaissig, N. Sankla (ed), Adventitious root formation in cuttings. Discorides Pres, Portland Oregon. Pp. 102-116.
• MALIK, N. , J. PEREZ and M. KUNTA. 2012. The effect of leaf presence on the rooting of stem cutting of bitter melon and on changes in polyamine levels. Agricultural Sciences, 3, 936-940. Retrieved from: doi: 10.4236/as.2012.37114.
• MARCOTRIAGIANO, M. and MCGLEW. 1990. Laboratory exercise demonstrating the importance of leaves in the rooting of herbaceous stem cuttings. Hort. Sci. 25(11):1441-1442.
• MCGROATY, M. 2015. The Gardeners Secret Handbooks. “Using bottom heat to propagate your cuttings”. Retrieved from: freeplant.com/bottomheat.htm. Visited: 2018- May 15.
• MCMULLEN, S. 2011. Planting a Eugenia cutting. Propagation handbook-basic technique gardeners. SFGates homeguides. Retrieved from: homeguides.sfgates.com/planting-eugenia-cutting-81481.html.
• MITCHELL, R. G. 2012. The effect of bottom heat on rooting Pinus patula and Pinus elliotti x Pinus caribaea stem cuttings in South Africa. Southern Africa Forestry Journal. Volume 196, 2002-Issue 1. Retrieved from: https;//doi.org/10.1080/20702620.2002.10434614. Accessed: 2018-January 25.
• NEWTON, A. C., P. N. MUTHOKA. and J. M. DICK. 1992. The influence of leaf area on the rooting physiology of leafy stem cuttings of Terminalia spinosa Eng. Trees 6: 210-215.
• OFORI, D. A., A. C. NEWTON and J. GRACE. 1996. Vegetative propagation of Milcia excelsa by leafy stem cuttings: effects of auxin concentration, leaf area and rooting medium. For Ecol Mang. 84; 39-48.
• REUVENI, O., and M RAVIV. 1980. Importance of leaf retention to rooting of avocado cuttings. J. Amer. Soc Hort Sci. 106 (20: 127-130).
• RYAN, G., E. F. FROLICH, and T. P. KINSELLA. 1958. Some fctors influencing rooting of grafted cuttings. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 72:454-61SAMISH, R. M. and P. SPIEGEL. 1957. The influence of nutrition of the mother vine on the rooting of cuttings. Ktavin 8; 93-100.
• TOUSSAINT, A. N., A. LEBRUN, and J. ROGGEMANS. 1991. Cutting and in vitro propagation of Eugenia smithii Poir. Acta Horticulturae 314. 77-83.
• WU, H. C. 2011. Roles of starch and phenolic compounds vegetative propagation of Protea cynaroides stem cuttings. Retrieved from: www.semanticscholar.org. Visited: 2018-May 26.