Comparative Analysis of Single, Double and Quad Electric Vehicle Powertrain Systems

Abstract

Electric vehicles offer a promising solution to solving environmental problems related to air pollution. The typical powertrain design of an electric vehicle includes a relatively high-speed-low-torque electric motor integrated with some mechanical system to transmit the output mechanical energy to the wheels, such as the gearbox, transmission and differential. Different drivetrain configurations with single, double and quad electric motors can be used in electric vehicles. In this study, it is aimed to compare the effects of different powertrain configurations on the acceleration performance, range and energy consumption of the electric vehicle. Single, dual and quad motor electric vehicle powertrain systems were simulated with MATLAB Simulink according to the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). The Volvo XC40 Recharge electric car was used as the reference vehicle with the same vehicle characteristics, battery type/capacity and the same total power output by changing only the electric motor powertrain configurations. It has been determined that quadruple electric motor powertrain configuration has lower energy consumption, longer range and better acceleration performance than the single and double electric motor powertrain configurations.

Keywords

• Acceleration performance
• Electric vehicles
• Energy consumption
• Powertrain
• Range

References

1. EA – International Energy Agency. IEA – International Energy Agency; www.iea.org. https://www.iea.org/
2. Sorniotti A, Holdstock T, Pilone GL, Viotto F, Bertolotto S, Everitt ME, Barnes R, Stubbs B, Westby M. Analysis and simulation of the gearshift methodology for a novel two-speed transmission sys-tem for electric powertrains with a central motor. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Auto-mobile Engineering. 2012;226(7):915–929.
3. Husain I. Electric and hybrid vehicles: design fundamentals. CRC press;2010.
4. Ehsani M, Gao Y, Longo S, Ebrahimi K. Modern electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles. CRC press;2018.
5. Sorniotti A, Holdstock T, Everitt M, Fracchia M, Viotto F, Caval-lino C, Bertolotto S. A novel clutchless multiple-speed transmis-sion for electric axles. International Journal of Powertrains. 2013;2(2-3):103–131.
6. Roozegar M, Angeles J. The optimal gear-shifting for a multi-speed transmission system for electric vehicles. Mechanism and Machine Theory. 2017;116:1–13.
7. Mousavi MSR, Boulet B. Modeling, simulation and control of a seamless two-speed automated transmission for electric vehicles. In 2014 IEEE American Control Conference. 2014;3826–3831.
8. Walker PD, Abdul Rahman S, Zhu B, Zhang N. Modelling, simu-lations, and optimisation of electric vehicles for analysis of trans-mission ratio selection. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2013;5: 340435.

9. Jones, W. D. (2007). Putting Electricity Where the Rubber Meets the Road [News]. IEEE Spectrum. 2007;44(7):18–20.
10. Ruan J, Song Q. A novel dual-motor two-speed direct drive battery electric vehicle drivetrain. IEEE Access, 2019;7,54330–54342.
11. De Pinto S, Camocardi P, Chatzikomis C, Sorniotti A, Bottiglione F, Mantriota G, Perlo P. On the comparison of 2- and 4-wheel-drive electric vehicle layouts with central motors and single- and 2-speed transmission systems. Energies. 2020;13,3328.
12. Yurdaer, E., & Kocakulak, T. (2021). Comparison of energy consumption of different electric vehicle power systems using fuzzy logic-based regenerative braking. Eng Perspect, 1(1), 11-21.
13. Volvo Cars. (n.d.). Volvo Cars. https://www.volvocars.com/
14. Barlow TJ, Latham S, McCrae IS, Boulter PG. A reference book of driving cycles for use in the measurement of road vehicle emis-sions. TRL Published Project Report;2019.