Agricultural Tractor Cabin Safety Analysis and Test Correlation

Abstract

Tractors are important vehicles for agricultural fields and they are widely used. Even if they do not be in the traffic due to their intended use, safety of the driver is important if the tractor is rollover. In tractor, the impact energy is provided by cabin or protective profile structure during rollover. Safety test conditions have been established by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) by determining the loads that may occur in case of rollover. According to the standard which developed by OECD, the effects of the energy to be generated during rollover or impact on the structure are examined by performing tests under the specified loads. In this study, static loading test of tractor cabins is simulated by finite element method according to the ISO 3471 standart. Tractor cabin finite element models have been prepared with HyperMesh and HyperCrash software. Nonlinear explicit analysis of the model was performed under the loads applied during the test. . The analysis were carried out using RADIOSS software, based on the operating principle of the load carrying mechanism in order to simulate the test loads. The finite element model is limited to the frame connection points and the deformations are examined for three loading conditions. According to the results which are obtained from the test, the finite element analysis of the designed cabin was also validated.

Keywords

• OECD,ROPS,Agricultural Tractors,Cabin Strength,ISO 3471

References

1. Murphy, D. J., (2002). Summary of Fatal Farm Incidents, 34 Incidents, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Ag-ricultural and Biological Engineering.
2. Shende R., Kshirsagar V.P. Shelke.(2016). Design and Op-timization of Tractor Roll Over Protective Structure, IJDER, 4(3), 933-939.
3. Oecd Code 4, (2005), Standard Code for the Official Testing of Protective Structures on Agricultural and Forestry Trac-tors. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Devel-opment.
4. Lenain R., Hugo E., Langle T., (2010). Sensitivity of the Absorbed Energy into a ROPS During a Rollover Situation: Comparison to the Security Level Proposed into OECD Code 4. International Conference on Agricultural Engineer-ing.
5. Blanco D., Martin C., Ortalde A., (2016). Virtual ROPS and FOPS Testing on Agricultural Tractors According to OECD Standard Code 4 and 10. 14th International LS-DYNA Users Conference.
6. Bargetti S., Robolotti F., Rota F., (2015). Development of a Model for the Simulation of ROPS Tests on Agricultural Tractors Cabin: Numerical Models and Experimental Verifi-cation. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applica-tions, 5(9), 76-86.
7. Molari G., Badodi M., Guarnieri A., (2010). FEM Analy-sis of ROPS for Agricultural Self-Moving Machines. Inter-national Conference Ragusa.
8. Myers, M. L., (2000). Prevention Effectiveness of Rollover Protective Structures, Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 6(1): 29-40.

9. Silleli H., Taşbaş H., Çay İ.C., (2009). Tarım ve Orman Traktörlerinde Ön Sert Bölgenin Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(2), 166-172
10. ISO 3471, (2008). Earth-moving machinery – Roll-over protective structures – Labrotary tests and per-formance requirements. International Standard.
11. ISO 3164, (1995). Earth-moving machinery – La-boratory evaluations of protective structures- Specifi-cations for deflection limiting volume. International Standard.
12. Wang, S., Huang, Y., Xiao, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, H., (2017). A Modified Johnson-Cook Model for Hot Deformation Behavior of 35CrMo Steel. Metals, 7(9), 337.