Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 397 - 408, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1711318

Abstract

Hybrid Energy Storage Systems (HESS), combining batteries, super capacitors, and flywheel energy storage systems (FESS), enhance electric vehicle (EV) performance by improving energy efficiency and extending battery lifespan. This study presents a comparative analysis of Pareto-based Multi-Objective Optimization (PMO) and Multi-Verse Optimization (MVO) for energy management across high-speed, city, and mixed driving conditions. Modelling and simulations were carried out using MATLAB/Simulink, with optimization algorithms implemented through custom MATLAB scripts. MVO demonstrates superior performance in both energy allocation and battery stress reduction. For high-speed driving, it achieves an average energy consumption of 54.19 kWh/100 km, while city and mixed cycles record 15.36 kWh/100 km and 9.88 kWh/100 km, respectively. Compared to PMO, MVO reduces battery energy usage by 15.3% and energy losses by 18.98%, while increasing FESS utilization by over 40%. In city driving, FESS contribution rises from 4.00 kWh to 12.18 kWh, reducing battery dependency significantly. Regenerative braking efficiency remains constant at 76.92% across all profiles, indicating stable energy recovery. The findings highlight that PMO and traditional methods tend to underutilize FESS, especially in stop-and-go traffic. MVO effectively redistributes energy by dynamically engaging FESS and super capacitors, minimizing battery cycling and thermal load. This contributes to improved system efficiency, better urban driving performance, and lower carbon impact. These results establish MVO as a highly effective and computationally efficient approach for real-time EV energy management and fuel-equivalent savings.

References

  • [1] Wang C, Liu R, Tang A. Energy management strategy of hybrid energy storage system for electric vehicles based on genetic algorithm optimization and temperature effect. J Energy Storage. 2022;50:104314. doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.104314
  • [2] Yu H, Castelli-Dezza F, Cheli F, Tang X, Hu X, Lin X. Dimensioning and power management of hybrid energy storage systems for electric vehicles with multiple optimization criteria. arXiv. 2018;1801.07183. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1801.07183
  • [3] Xu B, Shi J, Li S, Li H, Wang Z. Energy consumption and battery aging minimization using a Q-learning strategy for a battery/ultracapacitor electric vehicle. arXiv. 2020;2010.14115. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2010.14115
  • [4] Wangsupphaphol A, Phichaisawat S, Nik Idris NR, Jusoh A, Muhamad ND, Lengkayan R. A systematic review of energy management systems for battery/supercapacitor electric vehicle applications. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):11200. doi:10.3390/su151411200
  • [5] Wang P, Zhao H. Energy management control strategies for energy storage systems in electric vehicles: An overview. Energy Storage. 2023;5(6):e573. doi:10.1002/est2.573
  • [6] Kumar N, Singh B. Energy management system based hybrid energy storage system using supercapacitor for electric vehicles. J Energy Storage. 2023;50:104123. doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.104123
  • [7] Li J, Chen Z. Optimizing hardware configuration for solar-powered energy storage systems in electric vehicles. Sci Rep. 2023;13:80219. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-80219-2
  • [8] Smith A, Jones B. A rule-based energy management system of experimental battery/supercapacitor hybrid energy storage system for electric vehicles. Energy Convers Manag. 2023;245:114623. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114623
  • [9] Zhao L, Wang Y. The control of lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors in hybrid energy storage systems for electric vehicles. Int J Energy Res. 2023;47(2):7150. doi:10.1002/er.7150
  • [10] Lemian D, and Bode F. Battery-Supercapacitor Energy Storage Systems for Electrical Vehicles: A Review. Energies 2022;15(15):5683. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155683
  • [11] Zhang Y, Wang C. Battery-supercapacitor energy storage systems for electric vehicles: A review. Energies. 2023;15(15):5683. doi:10.3390/en15155683
  • [12] Chen M, Zhang J. Review of battery-supercapacitor hybrid energy storage systems for electric vehicles: Configurations, control strategies, and future directions. Energy Rep. 2023;9:1841–60. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.123
  • [13] Liu H, Li X. A systematic review of energy management systems for battery/supercapacitor hybrid energy storage in electric vehicles. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):11200. doi:10.3390/su151411200
  • [14] Rehman S, Liao Z. Energy management strategies of battery-ultracapacitor hybrid energy storage system for electric vehicles: Issues and solutions. Energy Storage Mater. 2022;45:104–23. doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.005
  • [15] Dhand A, Pullen K. Optimal energy management for a flywheel-assisted battery electric vehicle. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng. 2015;229(12):1672–82. doi:10.1177/0954407014562861
  • [16] Kuo JK, Hsieh HK. Research of flywheel system energy harvesting technology for fuel cell hybrid vehicles. Fuel Cells. 2013;13(6):1234–41. doi:10.1002/fuce.201300067
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Hybrid and Electric Vehicles and Powertrains
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Najmuddin Jamadar 0000-0001-7732-2495

Suhani Jamadar 0000-0003-2839-8447

Publication Date September 30, 2025
Submission Date June 1, 2025
Acceptance Date July 9, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Jamadar, N., & Jamadar, S. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, 9(3), 397-408. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1711318
AMA Jamadar N, Jamadar S. Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles. IJASTECH. September 2025;9(3):397-408. doi:10.30939/ijastech.1711318
Chicago Jamadar, Najmuddin, and Suhani Jamadar. “Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9, no. 3 (September 2025): 397-408. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech. 1711318.
EndNote Jamadar N, Jamadar S (September 1, 2025) Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9 3 397–408.
IEEE N. Jamadar and S. Jamadar, “Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles”, IJASTECH, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 397–408, 2025, doi: 10.30939/ijastech..1711318.
ISNAD Jamadar, Najmuddin - Jamadar, Suhani. “Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9/3 (September2025), 397-408. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech. 1711318.
JAMA Jamadar N, Jamadar S. Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles. IJASTECH. 2025;9:397–408.
MLA Jamadar, Najmuddin and Suhani Jamadar. “Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, 2025, pp. 397-08, doi:10.30939/ijastech. 1711318.
Vancouver Jamadar N, Jamadar S. Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles. IJASTECH. 2025;9(3):397-408.


International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology (IJASTECH) is published by Society of Automotive Engineers Turkey

by.png