​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY

Volume: 3 Number: 2 April 1, 2018
  • Stıne Dalager Nıelsen

​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to undertake a theoretical discourse on preservation and adaptation of recent past built heritage through an analysis of two case study projects. This involves challenging the current ideological separation between recent built heritage and “classical” conservation with particular focus on their diverging relationships to authenticity and appraisal. The paper will discuss two case studies, the first, a 1930s carpark, “Palægaragerne”, in Copenhagen Elgaard Architecture and the second, a 1970s student accommodation building, “The Florey”, in Oxford Avanti Architects , which reflect the author's work in practice with recent past heritage. Furthermore, the paper will compare national regulation in the UK and in Denmark and show how they relate to key international guidelines on the subject matter. Here, a particular focus will be on their interpretation of the Burra Charter Australia ICOMOS Burra Charter, 2013 and the Nara Charter of Authenticity ICOMOS 1994 and how this may have affected the different project outcomes. The two exploratory case studies contained in the paper will be used to exemplify current regulation and practice in the field and the findings will summarise methodological and legislative shortcomings and recommended updates of these. General findings of the paper indicate, that heritage bodies tend to emphasise the overall appearance of recent past heritage rather than the originality of the fabric. Appraisals are based on general assumptions that most materials of this era are of a lesser quality and importance and therefore replaceable. This touches upon the core ethics of traditional conservation practice: The question of authenticity. Is it acceptable to replace original fabric of a listed building due to improved, technical solutions currently available, that were not possible at the time of construction? Or should we merely preserve/improve what is built? The paper concludes that there is a need for a more comprehensive understanding of our resent past as a historic and aesthetic periods in its own right. This includes appraisal of typical material uses, maintenance requirements, tectonics and guidance on diagnosing problems and systematically working through repair options as practised in traditional conservation including dedicated training at an international level

Keywords

References

  1. Australia ICOMOS Burra Charter, 2013, “The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance”, 2013
  2. Avanti Architects (2015), “Florey Building, Heritage Impact Statement” December 2015
  3. Berman, Alan (2010), “Jim Stirling and the Red Triology. Three Radical Buildings”, Francis Lincoln Publishers Ltd, 2010
  4. Bold, J., Larkham, P., Pickard (2017), ”Authentic Reconstruction; Authenticity, Architecture and the Built Heritage”, Bloomsbury Academic, 2017
  5. Digan, Katie (2015), “Places of Memory: The case of the House of the Wannsee Conference” Palgrave Macmillan, 2015
  6. DOCOMOMO-UK (2017) “James Dunnet Writes” https://www.docomomo.uk/
  7. English Heritage (2013), ”Practical Building Conservation Vol 3: Concrete”, Ashgate 2013
  8. Jencks, Charles (1973) “Modern Movements in Architecture”, Penguin Books, 1973

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Stıne Dalager Nıelsen This is me

Publication Date

April 1, 2018

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Nıelsen, S. D. (2018). ​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, 3(2), 88-101. https://izlik.org/JA96NR22FR
AMA
1.Nıelsen SD. ​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. 2018;3(2):88-101. https://izlik.org/JA96NR22FR
Chicago
Nıelsen, Stıne Dalager. 2018. “​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 3 (2): 88-101. https://izlik.org/JA96NR22FR.
EndNote
Nıelsen SD (April 1, 2018) ​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 3 2 88–101.
IEEE
[1]S. D. Nıelsen, “​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY”, International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 88–101, Apr. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA96NR22FR
ISNAD
Nıelsen, Stıne Dalager. “​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 3/2 (April 1, 2018): 88-101. https://izlik.org/JA96NR22FR.
JAMA
1.Nıelsen SD. ​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. 2018;3:88–101.
MLA
Nıelsen, Stıne Dalager. “​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, Apr. 2018, pp. 88-101, https://izlik.org/JA96NR22FR.
Vancouver
1.Stıne Dalager Nıelsen. ​THE RECENT PAST & THE QUESTION OF AUTHENTICITY. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies [Internet]. 2018 Apr. 1;3(2):88-101. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA96NR22FR