COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN LOW-INCOME COMMUNITY DESIGN IN THAILAND

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 31 - 37, 01.03.2018

Sadanu Sukkasame

Abstract

This paper focuses on a complex community design and community upgrading project in Thailand and reconsiders the role of the community architect as designer, coordinator, and planner to achieve people’s participation in the community design. The Mettatham community occupied the land of a Thai temple many years ago. After a period of negotiation, an agreement was reached to rent and share the land between the community and other low income living nearby. Land sharing and settlement upgrading were employed to achieve a win-win compromise. The project was financed by the Baan Mankong Programme BMP under the Thai Community Organizations Development Institute CODI . I was appointed to lead the project as a community architect. This paper examines how a participatory design approach can contribute to solving housing problems and promote sustainability for the future. A participatory design approach to build 56 housing units was undertaken through community design workshops and meetings. Working and interacting closely with people who experience poverty and have great ambition to improve their living conditions is the key to engaging with the poor. Employing simple tools and flexible budgets opened new methods and collaborations within the community and people became increasingly involved in the process to ensure their needs were met

Keywords

Community architect, community participation, low-income community, sustainability

References

• AMUNDSEN, C., 1982. Community Participation. Design Quarterly, (117): 24–27.
• BOTES, L., & Van Rensburg, D., 2000. Community participation in development: Nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal, 35(1): 41–58.
• GOUGH, K. & KELLETT, P., 2001. Housing Consolidation and Home-based Income Generation: Evidence from
• Self-help Settlements in Two Colombian Cities. Cities, 18(4): 235–247. HAMDI, N., 1991. Housing without houses: participation, flexibility, enablement. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
• LUCK, R., 2003. Dialogue in participatory design. Design Studies, 24(6): 523–535.
• SANOFF, H., 2000. Community participation methods in design and planning. Chichester: Wiley.
• SANOFF, H., 2007. Special issue on participatory design. Design Studies, 28(3): 213–215.
• SHENG, Y., 1987. Promoting community participation through training: The DANIDA/UNCHS training programme. Habitat International, 11(4): 77–86.
• SOEN, D., 1981. Citizen and Community Participation in Urban Renewal and Rehabilitation—Comments on
• Theory and Practice. Community Development Journal 16(2): 105–118. TALÒ, C., Mannarini, T., & Rochira, A., 2014. Sense of Community and Community Participation: A Meta
• Analytic Review. Social Indicators Research 117(1): 1–28. UN-HABITAT., 2004. Urban Land for All. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
• UN-HABITAT., 2005. Financing Urban Shelter: Global Report on Human Settlement. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
• UN-HABITAT., 2008a. Housing the Poor in Asian Cities, Land: A Crucial Element in Housing the Urban Poor. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
• UN-HABITAT., 2008b. Quick Guides for Policy Makers, Housing the Poor in Asia Cities. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
• UN-HABITAT., 2009. Community Development Fund in Thailand. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
• WILLIAMS, J., 2006. Community Participation. Policy Studies, 27(3): 197–217.