​THE IMPACT OF THE BLACK SEA COASTAL ROAD ON THE COASTAL CITIES; A COMPARISON OF GİRESUN AND ORDU

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 68 - 79, 01.04.2018

Özgür Demirkan Selin Karaibrahimoğlu Ayhan Usta

Abstract

The presence of 'coast' or 'sea' gives the city its own character, while it enriches the urban space in terms of functionality and also differentiates its conceptual dimensions. From a functional point of view, coasts are evaluated as a part of city that hosts different fields such as social and cultural activities, entertainment, recreation, trade, accommodation, etc. Incedayı, 2006 ; and from a conceptual perspective, coast is defined as a space bordered by water and land components or the interface between these two components Timmerman and White 1997 . Therefore, the 'coastal cities', which have unique identity to the coast with a unique urban identity and culture, have unique problems. These problems are the concepts that explain the functional and conceptual value of the coast as well as the interrelated concepts in itself, such as the focal point of coast, components that generate coastal cities, loosing the coast, presence of human on the coast and the interventions on coastal cities. Particularly, the transport decisions as a result of bad plans and similar interventions on the coast "loose the coast" and cause the "loss of unique values for coastal cities". Recently, the 'Black Sea Coastal Road' where man-made interventions and their results have been clearly monitored has been the topic of much debate in this context. This led to the loss of the coastal city identity of all Black Sea cities except for Ordu . The cities that had existence with the coast have moved far away from the coast because of the coastal road and this had a negative impact on urban life in terms of coast and city integration, and the life was transformed into a different concept. The coastal morphology, which is the main determinant of the urban and spatial structure, has been distorted and a new coastal morphology has been established with the filling areas Usta, 2016 For these reasons, it has been determined that the study of Giresun and Ordu cities, which are located in close proximity to each other but where the coastal road passes through different axes according to the shore, is discussed in the context of the shore-specific 'functional' and 'conceptual' parameters. These parameters will be evaluated through comparative analysis tables including headlines such as 'order, movement, transportation, nature, topography, focus, perception, culture, identity' for both cities. In this way, it is aimed to discuss the results of urban unplanned interventions in the context of 'city and urban'

Keywords

coast, coastal city, black sea coastal road, urban

References

• Bekdemir, Ü., 2000. Giresun Kent Coğrafyası, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Orta Öğretim Sosyal Alanlar Eğitimi ABD, Erzurum.
• Bekdemir, Ü., 2007. Karadeniz Kıyı Kentleri (Samsun-Hopa Arası), Çizgi Kitapevi, Konya.
• Bender, R.,1993.Where the City Meets the Shore, in Waterfronts, A New Frontier for Cities on Water, pp.351, ed. Rinio Bruttomesso, Citta’ d Acqua, Venice.
• Duru, B. 2001. Kıyı Yönetiminde Bütüncül Yaklaşımlar ve Ulusal Kıyı Politikası. Basılmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kent ve Çevre Bilimleri ABD, Ankara.
• Emecen, F., 2009. Kaleden liman kentine: Giresun Şehrinin tarihi gelişim sürecine dair kısa notlar. Giresun ve Doğu Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Sempozyum Bildirileri: 9-11 Ekim, Giresun, s.33-39.
• Erkök, F., 2001. Kentsel Bileşenleri ve Kıyı Kenti Kimliği Bağlamında İstanbul’un Öznel ve Nesnel Değerlendirmesi, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Fidan, N., 1991. “Antalya Kıyı Bandında Yer Alan Turizm Yatırım Alanlarının Çevre Üzerine Etkileri”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Hudson, B.,1996. Cities on the Shore, The Urbn Littoral Frontier, Pinter, London, NY.
• İncedayı, D., 2006. Kültür Politikası ve Kıyılar, Mimarist Dergisi, Yıl:6, Sayı:19, 38-44.
• Mancuso, F., 1990. The Venetian Case, Marco Polo.
• Mumford, L., 1961. The City in History; its Origins, its Transformations and its Prospects, Secker&Warburg, London.
• Öztan, Y.,1976. Kıyılarımız ve Korunması, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Dergisi, Sayı: 2.
• Timmerman, P. & White, R., 1997. “Megahydropolis: Coastal Cities in the Contex of Global Environmental Change”, Global Environmental Change, Vol:7, Issue:3.
• Torre, L., 1989. “ Waterfront Development”, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
• URL 1 http://www.kgm.gov.tr/sayfalar/kgm/sitetr/projeler/karadenizsahilyolu.aspx
• URL 2 http://www.arkitera.com/soylesi/860/ayhan-usta-ile-soylesi
• URL 3 http://www.ordu.gov.tr/ordunun-tarihcesi
• URL 4 http://www.giresun.gov.tr/cografya1
• Uzun, O., 1990. Çevre Tasarımında Su Kullanımı, Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı, No:48, Adana.
• Yılmaz, C., 2009. “Karadeniz Sahil Yolunun Kıyı Kentleri Üzerine Etkileri Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye Coğrafyası Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, (TÜCAUM) V.Ulusal Coğrafya Sempozyumu 2008, (16-17 Ekim 2008), Bildiriler Kitabı, (147-157), Ankara.
• Zorlu, T.ve Aydıntan, E.ve Engin, E., 2010. Kentsel Müdahale, Kent Kimliği: Tanjant Ve Karadeniz Sahil Yollarının Trabzon Kent Kimliğine Etkileri, Mimarlık Dergisi, Sayı: 352.