THE OVERALL OUTLOOK OF FAVORITISM IN ORGANIZATIONS: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Abstract

It is a fact that favoritism has become an important subject matter as corporations and both governmental and non-governmental organizations become more concerned with ethical issues. However, the relevant literature seems to be rivened with many overlapping and vague concepts such as nepotism, cronyism, clientelism, patronage etc. We are aware of the fact that redefining concepts already in currency is a difficult, if not snobbish, task. Therefore, we attempt to review the literature and point out their appropriate definitions for organizational theory. In doing so we also developed a more complete picture by placing the relevant concepts in a customized X-Y axis. We hope that researchers and students of organizational behavior and ethics will find it useful in clarifying their steps when dealing with these concepts

Keywords

• Favoritism, Nepotism, Cronyism

References

1. Akalan, Abdullah Recai (2006), Türk Kamu Hizmetinde İyi Yönetim ve Yolsuzlukla
2. Mücadele, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Konya. Aközer, Mehmet (2003), “Kamuoyu Gözüyle Kamuda Yolsuzluk”, Görüş, Aralık, ss.14
3. Aktan, Coşkun Can (1992), Politik Yozlaşma ve Kleptokrasi: 1980-1990 Türkiye
4. Deneyimi, İstanbul: Alfa Yayıncılık. Aktan, Coşkun Can (1997), “Siyasal Patoloji ve Siyasal Yozlaşma”, Yeni Türkiye, Sayı:14, Mart-Nisan, ss.1063-1076.
5. Aktan, Coşkun Can (1999), Ahlaki Yeniden Yapılanma ve Toplam Ahlaka Doğru: 3
6. Siyasal Ahlak. İstanbul: Arı Düşünce ve Toplumsal Gelişim Derneği Yayınları. Aktan, Coşkun Can (2001), Yolsuzlukla Mücadele Stratejileri, Ankara: Hak-İş Yayınları.
7. Akyüz Ünal (2009), “Siyaset ve Ahlak”, Yasama Dergisi, Sayı:11, Ocak, Şubat, Mart, Nisan, ss.93-129.
8. Arya, Anil ve Jonathan Glovery (2003), “Real Options, Conflicting Valuations, and Favoritism”, Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol. 3, No. 1 Article 17.

9. Araslı, H., Bavik, A. ve Ekiz, E. H (2006), “The Effects of Nepotism on Human Resource
10. Management, The Case of Three, Four and Five Star Hotels In Northern Cyprus”, International Journal of Sociologie and Social Policy, Vol.26, No.7/8, pp.295-308. Araslı, Hüseyin ve Mustafa Tümer (2008), “Nepotism, Favoritism and Cronyism: A study of their effects on job stress and job satisfaction in the banking industry of north Cyprus”,
11. Social Behavior and Personality, Vol.36, No.9, pp.1237-1250.
12. Asunakutlu, Tuncer ve Umut Avcı (2010), “Aile İşletmelerinde Nepotizm Algısı ve İş
13. Tatmini İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt.15, No.2, ss. 93-109. Ateş, Özgür (2005), Aile Şirketleri: Değişim ve Süreklilik, Ankara Sanayi Odası,
14. Bayhan, Vehbi (2002), “Demokrasi Ve Sivil Toplum Örgütlerinin Engelleri: Patronaj Ve Nepotizm, C.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt. 26, No. 1, ss.1-13.
15. Beaupre, Martin G. and Ursula Hess (2003), “In My Mind, We All Smile: A Case of In- group Favoritism”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, pp. 371–377.
16. Bozkurt, Veysel (2000), Püritanizmden Hedonizme Yeni Çalışma Etiği, Bursa: Alesta Yayınevi.
17. Brandts, Jordi and Carles Sola (2010), “Personal relations and their effect on behavior in an organizational setting: An experimental study”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.73, pp. 246–253.
18. Cottingham, John (1986), “Partiality, Favouritism and Morality”, The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 144, pp.357-373.
19. Dasborough, T. Marie; Neal, M. Ashkanasy; Eugene Y.J. Tee and H.M. Tse Herman (2009), “What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 20, pp.571–585.
20. Eliaçık, Elif (2009), Yolsuzlukları Önlemede Uluslararası Deneyimler Ve Türkiye
21. Uygulaması, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Kadir Has Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Genç, Kurtuluş ve Y. Yahya Deryal (2006), “Orta ve Doğu Karadeniz’de Aile
22. İşletmelerinde Yönetim ve Organizasyon Sorunlarına İlişkin Bir Araştırma”, 2. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi Kongre Kitabı, 14-15 Nisan, ss.399-410. İyiişleroğlu, Salih Cem (2006), Aile Şirketleri: Adana ve Çevresinde Faaliyet Gösteren
23. Aile Şirketlerinde Nepotizm Uygulamasının Tesbitine Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kayabaşı, Yeltekin (2005), Politik Yozlasmaya Çözüm Olarak Anayasal İktisat,
24. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Khatri, Naresh and Eric W K Tsang (2003), “Antecedents and consequences of cronyism in organizations”, Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 289-303.
25. Khatri, Naresh; Cheng Ya Wen, Lee Wan Fuei, and Tjeng Ai Geok (2008), “Cronyısm:
26. Antecedents And Consequences”, SABRE Working Papers, 10-99, 1-46. Kwon, Illoong (2006), “Endogenous Favoritism in Organizations”, The B.E. Journal of
27. Theoretical Economics, 2006, vol. 6, issue 1
28. Lee, Joon-Suk (2008), “Favoritism in asymmetric procurement auctions”, International
29. Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 26, pp.1407–1424.
30. Lewis, Amy C. and Steven J. Sherman (2003), “Hiring you makes me look bad: Social- identity based reversals of the in-group favoritism effect”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 90, pp.262–276.
31. Loewe, Markus; Blume, Jonas and Johanna Speer (2008), “How Favoritism Affects the Business Climate: Empirical Evidence from Jordan”, Mıddle East Journal, Vol.62, No.2, pp.259-276.
32. Oceja L. V. and Fern´andez-Dols J. M. (2001), “Perverse Effects of Unfulfilled Norms: A
33. Look at the Roots of Favoritism”, Social Justice Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.289-303. Olson, Michael A.; Crawford Matthew T. and Will Devlin (2009), “Evidence for the underestimation of implicit in-group favoritism among low-status groups”, Journal of
34. Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.45, pp. 1111–1116.
35. Otten, Sabine and Dirk Wentura (2001), “Self-Anchoring and In-Group Favoritism: An
36. Individual Profiles Analysis”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 37, pp.525–532. Ören, Kenan (2007), “Sosyal Sermayede “Güven” Unsuru ve İşgücü Performansına
37. Etkisi”, Kamu-İş, Cilt. 9, No.1, ss.71-90. Özler, H., Ergun, D. Ö. ve G. E. Gümüştekin, (2007), “Aile İşletmelerinde Nepotizmin
38. Gelişim Evreleri ve Kurumsallaşma”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt. 17, ss.437-450. Özsemerci, Kemal (2002), “Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Yolsuzluklar, Nedenleri, Zararları ve Çözüm Önerileri”, Basılmamış Tez, Ankara, www.sayistay.gov.tr/yayin/elek/ekutupana2.asp?id=409
39. Öztürk, A.Turan (2008), ”Değişen Çağın Aile İşletmelerinde Kurum Kültürünün
40. Yerleştirilmesinde Profesyonel Yöneticilerden Beklentiler”, Çankaya Üniversitesi Fen- Edebiyat Fakültesi, ss.109-116. Ponzo Michela and Scoppa Vincenzo (2010), ”The use of informal networks in Italy:
41. Efficiency or favoritism?”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol.39, pp. 89–99. doi:10.1016/ j.socec.2009.07.007
42. Prendergast, Canice and Robert H. Topel (1996), “Favoritism in Organizations”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.104, No.5, pp. 958-978.
43. Randall D. Smith; Nancy DiTomaso; George F. Farris and Rene Cordero (2001),
44. “Favoritism, Bias, and Error in Performance Ratings of Scientists and Engineers: The Effects of Power, Status, and Numbers”, Sex Roles, Vol.45, No. 5/6, pp.337-358. Taylor E. Shelley; Peplau, Anne Letitia and O. David Sears (2010), Sosyal Psikoloji,
45. (Çev. Ali Dönmez), B.2., Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. Falk Armin and Zehnder Christian (2007), “Discrimination and In-group Favoritism in a
46. Citywide Trust Experiment, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich”, Working Paper, No. 318.