IMPROVING THE ABSORBTION OF EUROPEAN FUNDS BY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: CASE STUDY ROMANIAN CITY-HALLS

Abstract

Currently, the main source of financing regional development programs are European grants. There are some factors that affect the access of the Romanian local administration to these funds and our paper aims to identify the causes of inclusion or exclusion of certain communities from them. We explored four main factors that can influence the level of EU funds absorption: human resouces, problems of mayor’s offices, investment experience and public-private partnerships. The results of our research based on more than 60 city halls of cities larger than 10,000 inhabitants from Romania, reveal the factors that hold them back from obtaining the funds needed so much in order to develop efectively. The study proposes solutions in order to eliminate or reduce these risk factors.

Keywords

• public administration, european funds, development, risk

References

1. Băcanu, B. (2008), Organizaţia publică: teorie şi management, Iaşi: Polirom
2. Capra, F. (1984), The Turning Point: Science, Society and the Rising Culture, Bantam
3. Craciun, C., & Collins, P. (2008), Public Policy Management, Bucuresti: Polirom
4. Davis, I. (2007), Government as a business, McKinsey Quarterly
5. Dick, L. (2001), Ghidul Uniunii Europene, Bucureşti: Teora
6. Drucker, P. F. (2001), Management Challenges for the 21st Century, New York: HarperBusiness
7. European Comission (2010), Bugetul Uniunii Europene, pe scurt, Luxemburg: Oficiul pentru Publica ii al Uniunii Europene
8. Farazmand, A. (2009), “Building Administrative Capacity for the Age of Rapid

9. Globalization: A Modest Prescription for the Twenty-First Century”, Public Administrative Review, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1007-1020
10. Friedman, T. (2005), The World is Flat, New York: Straus and Giroux
11. Hans, W.A. (2009), Public-Private Partnership in Infrastructure Development - Case
12. Studies from Asia and Europe, Weimar: Bauhaus-Universität Weimar Iftimoaie, C. (2000), Relatii externe ale administra iei publice locale, Bucuresti: Editura Economica
13. Jantsch, E. ( 1980), The Self-Organizing Universe, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press
14. Kappeler, A., and Nemoz, M. (2010), Public-private partnerships in europe – before and during the recent financial crisis, European Investment Bank
15. Layne, C. (2006), “The Unipolar Illusion Revisited. The Coming End of The United
16. States Unipolar Movement”, International Security, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 7-41
17. Matei, L., and Matei, A. I. (2008), “Globalization and Europeanization - A Projection on a European Model of PublicAdministration”, Theoretical and Applied Economics, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 33-52
18. Ministry of Municipal Affairs (1999), Public Private Partnership: A Guide for Local
19. Government, British Columbia Morgan, G. (2006). Images of Organization, Sage Publications CA: Thousand Oaks
20. Neamtu, B., & Dragos, D. C. (2007), “Reforming local administration in Romania:
21. Trends and obstacles”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 929-648
22. Peters, B. G. (2001), The Future of Governing, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas
23. Pons, E. (1995), Les Tsiganes en Roumanie: des citoyens a part entiere?, Editions L'Harmattan
24. Schein, E.H. (1992), Organizational Culture and Leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
25. Soros Foundation Romania (2010), Autorităţile locale faţă în faţă cu fondurile europene, Bucureşti
26. Vass, I. (2009), Parteneriatele public-private, cheia programelor anticriză, Curierul Naţional, no. 5355
27. Weick, K. E. and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001), Managing the Unexpected, San Francisco: Jossy Bass