BibTex RIS Cite

DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY

Year 2011, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 31 - 38, 01.06.2011

Abstract

The purpose of study is to search for the basic characteristics of the relationships
between the Turkish culture and the degree of implementing the principles of
corporate governance in Turkish companies. The study involves an analysis and
an assessment of corporate governance practices in Turkey in terms of Turkish
cultural concepts and dimensions. After the analysis, it is observed that not only
small companies but also big-sized firms work still as “family business”.
Moreover some problems have been identified about this relationship. These
include interpenetration of management, stakeholders and family, not seeing the
family as independent entity from the company, unconsciousness of
institutionalization, difficulty of the process from entrepreneurship management
style to professional management style and lack of sharing knowledge and
decisions by family members with other stakeholders and so on. In conclusion, we
can say that a large part of the obstacles to the development of corporate
governance in Turkey are based on the traditional structure and culture of
organizations. In order to solve these problems, the level of institutionalization is
needed to be raised.

References

  • Aktan, Coşkun Can (2011), http://www.sobiadacademy.net/sobem/e- yonetim/kurumsal-yonetim/anasayfa-corporate.htm, [Accessed: 29.03.2011].
  • Ararat, Melisa and Ugur, Mehmet (2001), “Corporate Governance in Turkey: An
  • Overview and Some Policy Recommendations”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.58-75. Arsoy, Aylin Poroy and Crowther, David (2008), “Corporate Governance in
  • Turkey: Reform and Convergence”, Social Responsibility, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp.407- Aysan, Mustafa (2008), “Chapter 7: Culture and Corporate Governance: The Turkish Case”, (in: Güler Aras and David Crowther-Eds., Culture and Corporate
  • Governance), Leicester: Social Responsibility Research Network, pp.124-146. Corporate Governance Report: Boards in Turbulent Times (2009), Heidrick and Struggles.
  • Corporate Governance in Turkey: A Pilot Study, OECD, Paris, 2004.
  • Haniffa, Roszaini and Cooke Terence (2002), “Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations”, Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp.317-349.
  • Hofstede, Geert (2001), Culture’s Consequences, Sage Publications.
  • Kurumsal Yonetim Ilkeleri (2003), Sermaye Piyasasi Kurulu, Ankara.
  • Kurumsal Yonetim En Iyi Uygulama Kodu: Yonetim Kurulunun Yapisi ve Isleyisi (2002), Turk Sanayicileri ve Isadamlari Dernegi, Istanbul.
  • Li, Jiatao and Harrison, Richard (2008), “Corporate Governance and National
  • Culture: A Multi-country Study”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp.607- Licht, Amir, Goldschmidt, Chanan and Schwartz, Shalom (2005), “Culture, Law and Corporate Governance”, International Review of Law and Economics, No. 25, pp.229-255.
  • Licht, Amir, Goldschmidt, Chanan and Schwartz (2001), Culture, Law and Finance: Cultural Dimensions of Corporate Governance Laws, Social Science Research Network.
  • Mallin, Christine (Ed.) (2011), Handbook on International Corporate Governance:
  • Country Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing: Second Edition, Massachusetts. Mbuya, John Chibaya (2009), Corporate Governance and Culture, Dr John
  • Chibaya Mbuya Publication. Monks, Robert and Minow, Nell (2008), Corporate Governance, John Wiley and Sons Publications.
  • OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (2004), Organization for Economic
  • Cooperation and Development, Paris. Public Disclosure Platform: Corporate Governance Index (2011), http://www.kap.gov.tr/yay/GenelBilgiler/Endeksler.aspx#XKURY, [Accessed: 03.2011].
  • Salacuse, Jeswald (2003), “Corporate Governance, Culture and Convergence:
  • Corporations American Style or with a European Touch”, 9 Law & Bus. Rev. Am. Sargut, Selami (2001), Kulturlerarasi Farklilasma ve Yonetim, Istanbul: Imge
  • Kitabevi, Genisletilmis 2.Baski. Turkish Corporate Governance Map (2005), The Boston Consulting Groups,
  • Publications of Corporate Governance Association of Turkey. Turkish Management Culture and Corporate Governance: A Comparative Study (2006), TKYD Istanbul Bilgi University Research Report.
Year 2011, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 31 - 38, 01.06.2011

Abstract

References

  • Aktan, Coşkun Can (2011), http://www.sobiadacademy.net/sobem/e- yonetim/kurumsal-yonetim/anasayfa-corporate.htm, [Accessed: 29.03.2011].
  • Ararat, Melisa and Ugur, Mehmet (2001), “Corporate Governance in Turkey: An
  • Overview and Some Policy Recommendations”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.58-75. Arsoy, Aylin Poroy and Crowther, David (2008), “Corporate Governance in
  • Turkey: Reform and Convergence”, Social Responsibility, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp.407- Aysan, Mustafa (2008), “Chapter 7: Culture and Corporate Governance: The Turkish Case”, (in: Güler Aras and David Crowther-Eds., Culture and Corporate
  • Governance), Leicester: Social Responsibility Research Network, pp.124-146. Corporate Governance Report: Boards in Turbulent Times (2009), Heidrick and Struggles.
  • Corporate Governance in Turkey: A Pilot Study, OECD, Paris, 2004.
  • Haniffa, Roszaini and Cooke Terence (2002), “Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations”, Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp.317-349.
  • Hofstede, Geert (2001), Culture’s Consequences, Sage Publications.
  • Kurumsal Yonetim Ilkeleri (2003), Sermaye Piyasasi Kurulu, Ankara.
  • Kurumsal Yonetim En Iyi Uygulama Kodu: Yonetim Kurulunun Yapisi ve Isleyisi (2002), Turk Sanayicileri ve Isadamlari Dernegi, Istanbul.
  • Li, Jiatao and Harrison, Richard (2008), “Corporate Governance and National
  • Culture: A Multi-country Study”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp.607- Licht, Amir, Goldschmidt, Chanan and Schwartz, Shalom (2005), “Culture, Law and Corporate Governance”, International Review of Law and Economics, No. 25, pp.229-255.
  • Licht, Amir, Goldschmidt, Chanan and Schwartz (2001), Culture, Law and Finance: Cultural Dimensions of Corporate Governance Laws, Social Science Research Network.
  • Mallin, Christine (Ed.) (2011), Handbook on International Corporate Governance:
  • Country Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing: Second Edition, Massachusetts. Mbuya, John Chibaya (2009), Corporate Governance and Culture, Dr John
  • Chibaya Mbuya Publication. Monks, Robert and Minow, Nell (2008), Corporate Governance, John Wiley and Sons Publications.
  • OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (2004), Organization for Economic
  • Cooperation and Development, Paris. Public Disclosure Platform: Corporate Governance Index (2011), http://www.kap.gov.tr/yay/GenelBilgiler/Endeksler.aspx#XKURY, [Accessed: 03.2011].
  • Salacuse, Jeswald (2003), “Corporate Governance, Culture and Convergence:
  • Corporations American Style or with a European Touch”, 9 Law & Bus. Rev. Am. Sargut, Selami (2001), Kulturlerarasi Farklilasma ve Yonetim, Istanbul: Imge
  • Kitabevi, Genisletilmis 2.Baski. Turkish Corporate Governance Map (2005), The Boston Consulting Groups,
  • Publications of Corporate Governance Association of Turkey. Turkish Management Culture and Corporate Governance: A Comparative Study (2006), TKYD Istanbul Bilgi University Research Report.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA67VY44JR
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ayşegül Özbebek This is me

Esra Kılıçarslan Toplu This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özbebek, A., & Kılıçarslan Toplu, E. (2011). DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(1), 31-38.
AMA Özbebek A, Kılıçarslan Toplu E. DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY. IJBMS. June 2011;3(1):31-38.
Chicago Özbebek, Ayşegül, and Esra Kılıçarslan Toplu. “DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 3, no. 1 (June 2011): 31-38.
EndNote Özbebek A, Kılıçarslan Toplu E (June 1, 2011) DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 3 1 31–38.
IEEE A. Özbebek and E. Kılıçarslan Toplu, “DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY”, IJBMS, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2011.
ISNAD Özbebek, Ayşegül - Kılıçarslan Toplu, Esra. “DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 3/1 (June 2011), 31-38.
JAMA Özbebek A, Kılıçarslan Toplu E. DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY. IJBMS. 2011;3:31–38.
MLA Özbebek, Ayşegül and Esra Kılıçarslan Toplu. “DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, 2011, pp. 31-38.
Vancouver Özbebek A, Kılıçarslan Toplu E. DOES CULTURE MATTER FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY. IJBMS. 2011;3(1):31-8.