BibTex RIS Cite

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY

Year 2011, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 283 - 292, 01.12.2011

Abstract

The majority of the heads of the contemporary enterprises realize the existence of the problems connected with the imperfect management system. This work classifies the acting approaches to the construction of the enterprise management system. The comparison of advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, evaluated from the point of their influence on the enterprise controllability was performed in the course of the classification. The work analyses the reason of appearing new approaches to the enterprise management system and special attention paid to the comparison of the functional and process structures of management and to the evolution of the latter one. The management system is considered to be controllable, if to every management action corresponds strictly determined state of the object parameters, and this system is considered to be uncontrollable or not enough controllable, if the management object changes its parameters spontaneously. Therefore, the task of the enterprise administration is to choose the management system that will take into account the enterprise specification and provide its best controllability

References

  • Deming, W.E. (1988), Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
  • Center for Advanced Engineering Study. Hammer, M. (2003), The Agenda: What Every Business Must Do to Dominate the Decade, Three Rivers Press.
  • Hammer, M., Champy, J. (2003), Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for
  • Business Revolution, Harper Paperbacks. Smith, H., Fingar, P. (2002), Business Process Management: The Third Wave, Meghan-Kiffer Press.
  • Smith, H., Fingar, P. (2003), IT Doesn't Matter? Business Processes Do, Meghan- Kiffer Press.
Year 2011, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 283 - 292, 01.12.2011

Abstract

References

  • Deming, W.E. (1988), Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
  • Center for Advanced Engineering Study. Hammer, M. (2003), The Agenda: What Every Business Must Do to Dominate the Decade, Three Rivers Press.
  • Hammer, M., Champy, J. (2003), Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for
  • Business Revolution, Harper Paperbacks. Smith, H., Fingar, P. (2002), Business Process Management: The Third Wave, Meghan-Kiffer Press.
  • Smith, H., Fingar, P. (2003), IT Doesn't Matter? Business Processes Do, Meghan- Kiffer Press.
There are 5 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA24SC73DV
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Rostislav Kopitov This is me

Lev Faingloz This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 3 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kopitov, R., & Faingloz, L. (2011). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(2), 283-292.
AMA Kopitov R, Faingloz L. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY. IJBMS. December 2011;3(2):283-292.
Chicago Kopitov, Rostislav, and Lev Faingloz. “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 3, no. 2 (December 2011): 283-92.
EndNote Kopitov R, Faingloz L (December 1, 2011) COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 3 2 283–292.
IEEE R. Kopitov and L. Faingloz, “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY”, IJBMS, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 283–292, 2011.
ISNAD Kopitov, Rostislav - Faingloz, Lev. “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 3/2 (December 2011), 283-292.
JAMA Kopitov R, Faingloz L. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY. IJBMS. 2011;3:283–292.
MLA Kopitov, Rostislav and Lev Faingloz. “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, 2011, pp. 283-92.
Vancouver Kopitov R, Faingloz L. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE ENTERPRISE CONTROLLABILITY. IJBMS. 2011;3(2):283-92.