THE IMPACT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND CONTINGENT REWARD LEADERSHIP STYLES ON INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOUR: MEDIATING ROLE OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE QUALITY

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 69 - 79, 01.06.2010

Omer Turunc Mazlum Celık Akif Tabak Mehmet Kabak

Abstract

Innovation is utmost factor of organizational success during the period of unbelievable global competition. Innovation is generally triggered by leader’s strategic behaviors and leadership styles are decisive in organizations’ vision and mission nowadays. Employee’s innovation perception and also innovative behavior have an important role at the execution process of innovation. From this aspect, determination of factors which effect innovative behavior is an important research area. The paper focus on the determination of leader-member exchange quality’s (LMX) mediator role at the effects of transformational and contingent reward leadership’s style, at private and public sector, to employee’s innovative behaviors

Keywords

Transformational Leadership, Contingent Reward Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange Quality, Innovative Behavior

References

• Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator Mediator Variable Distinction in Social
• Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
• Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1990) The Implications of Transactional and Transformational
• Leadership for Individual, Team, and Organizational Development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–72. Bass, B.M. (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press, New York.
• Bettencourt, L. A. (2004). Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: The Direct and Moderating İnfluence of Goal Orientation, Journal of Retailing 80, 165–180
• Graen, George B., Liden, Robert C., & Hoel, William. (1982). Role of Leadership in The Employee Withdrawal Process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 868–872
• Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With The SIMPLIS
• Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientific International Software. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Mackenzie, Scott B., Podsakoff, Philip M., & Rich, Gregory A. (2001). Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Salesperson Performance. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 115–134.
• Mumford, M.D., Scott, G.M., Gaddis, B. & Strange, J.M. (2002) Leading Creative People:
• Orchestrating Expertise and Relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–50. Podsakoff, Philip M., Mackenzie, Scott B., & Bommer, William H. (1996). Transformational
• Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership As Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259– Podsakoff, Philip M., Todor, William D., Grover, Richard A., & Huber, Vandra. (1984).
• Situational Moderators of Leader Reward and Punishment Behaviors: Fact Or Fiction? Organizational Behavior Andhuman Performance, 34(1), 21–63. Podsakoff, Philip, Mackenzie, M., Moorman, Scott B., & Fetter, Robert H. (1990).
• Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers’ Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. Scott, S.U. & Bruce, R.A. (1994) Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of
• Individual Innovation in The Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607 Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Business, Canada: John Wiley ve Sons, Inc.
• Sosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J. & Kahai, S.S. (1997) Effects of Leadership Style and Anonymity on
• Group Potency and Effectiveness in A Group Decision Support System Environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89–103. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: Temel İlkeler ve Lisrel Uygulamaları, Ekinoks, Ankara.