What’s up with WhatsApp? A Critical Analysis of Mobile Instant Messaging Research in Language Learning

Abstract

This paper is devoted to exploring the way how the mobile instant messaging WhatsApp is deployed to enhance the learning of a second or foreign language. Therefore, this study set out to investigate the empirical studies related to WhatsApp and language learning published in peer-reviewed journals. Thirty-seven studies were selected after a four-phase article identification procedure and a systematic review was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of WhatsApp on language learning. The analysis focused on the keywords, sample sizes, participants, data sets, duration, and language learning benefits of the studies. The results have shown that WhatsApp has been used diversely in language learning. The studies found evidence that WhatsApp can be used to improve the four language skills (i.e. reading, listening, writing, and speaking), integrated language skills, and vocabulary. Moreover, WhatsApp was found to be effective in increasing motivation and language attitudes, fostering learner autonomy, increasing interaction, and lowering language anxiety. The study also provided future research directions and recommendations for practice concerning how to appropriately employ mobile instant messaging in language learning.

Keywords

• WhatsApp,Mobile instant messaging,Mobile phones,Language learning,EFL

References

1. Aburezeq, I. M., & Ishtaiwa, F. F. (2013). The impact of WhatsApp on interaction in an Arabic language teaching course. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 6(3), 165-180.
2. Ahmed, S. T. S. (2019). Chat and learn: Effectiveness of using Whatsapp as a pedagogical tool to enhance EFL learners’ reading and writing skills. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 8(2), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v2i2.6419
3. Alghamdy, R. Z. (2019). The impact of mobile language learning (WhatsApp) on EFL context: Outcomes and perceptions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p128
4. Al-Hamad, R. F., Al-Jamal, D. A. H., & Bataineh, R. F. (2019). The effect of MALL instruction on teens' writing performance. Digital Education Review , 35, 289-298.
5. Allagui, B. (2014). Writing through WhatsApp: An evaluation of students’ writing performance. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 8(3/4), 216-231. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.067022
6. Alsaleem, B. I. A. (2013). The effect of "WhatsApp" electronic dialogue journaling on improving writing vocabulary word choice and voice of EFL undergraduate Saudi students. Arab World English Journal, 4(3), 213-225.
7. Alzubi, A. A., & Kaur, M. S. (2018). The impact of social strategies through smartphones on the Saudi learners’ socio-cultural autonomy in EFL reading context. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018143958
8. Amry, A. B. (2014). The impact of Whatsapp mobile social learning on the achievement and attitudes of female students compared with face to face learning in the classroom. European Scientific Journal, 10(22), 116-136.

9. Andujar, A. (2016). Benefits of mobile instant messaging to develop ESL writing. System, 62, 63–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.004
10. Andújar-Vaca, A., & Cruz-Martínez, M. S. (2017). Mobile instant messaging: Whatsapp and its potential to develop oral skills. Media Education Research Journal, 25(50), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-04
11. Ashiyan, Z., & Salehi, H. (2016). Impact of WhatsApp on learning and retention of collocation knowledge among Iranian EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies,7(5), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.5p.112
12. Avci, H., & Adiguzel, T. (2017). A case study on mobile-blended collaborative learning in an English as a foreign language (EFL) Context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). 44-58. https://doi.org/10.28945/2051
13. Awada, G. (2016). Effect of WhatsApp on critique writing proficiency and perceptions toward learning. Journal of Cogent Education, 3, 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1264173
14. Baffour-Awuah, E. (2015). Institutional case-based study on the effect of research methods on project work in the curriculum of mechanical engineering programmes in Ghanaian polytechnics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 20–32.
15. Basal, A., Yilmaz, S., Tanriverdi, A., & Sari, L. (2016). Effectiveness of mobile applications in vocabulary teaching. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7, 47–59.
16. Bataineh, R. F., Al-Hamad, R. F., & Al-Jamal, D. A. (2018). Gender and EFL writing: Does WhatsApp make a difference? Teaching English with Technology, 18(2), 21-33.
17. Bataineh, R. B., Baniabdelrahman, A. A., & Khalaf, K. M. B. (2018). The effect of e-mail and WhatsApp on Jordanian EFL learners' paraphrasing and summarizing skills. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 14(3), 131-148.
18. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). An introduction to rethinking pedagogy. In H. Beetham, & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. London: Routledge.
19. Bensalem, E. (2018). The impact of WhatsApp on EFL students' vocabulary learning. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 23-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.2 Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
20. Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). Whatsapp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217-231. https://doi.org/10.28945/2051
21. Bozoglan, H., & Gok, D. (2017) Effect of mobile-assisted dialect awareness training on the dialect attitudes of prospective English language teachers, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(9), 772-787, https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1260572
22. British Council (2013). Turkey national needs assessment of state school English language teaching. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org.tr/sites/default/files/turkey_national_needs_assessment_ of_state_school_english_language_teaching.pdf
23. Bull, S., & Reid, E. (2004). Individualised revision material for use on a handheld computer. In J. Attewell &, C. Savill-Smith (Eds.), Learning with mobile devices: Research and development (pp. 35-42). London, UK: Learning Skills and Development Agency.
24. Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages.
25. Çetinkaya, L., & Sütçü, S. S. (2018). The effects of Facebook and WhatsApp on success in English vocabulary instruction. J Comput Assist Learn, 34, 504–514. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12255
26. Dewi, S. R. (2019). Utilizing WhatsApp application for teachıng integrated English (a case study at Unıversity of Technology Yogyakarta). Refleksi Edukatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 9(2), 164-171.
27. Fageeh, A. (2013). Effects of MALL applications on vocabulary acquisition and motivation. Arab World English Journal, 4(4), 420–447
28. Fattah, S. F. E. S. A. (2015). The effectiveness of using WhatsApp messenger as one of mobile learning techniques to develop students’ writing skills. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(32), 115-127.
29. Fauzi, I., & Angkasawati, P. (2019). The use of listenıng logs through Whatsapp in improving listening comprehension of EFL students. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 4(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v4i1.6773
30. Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008-2011. British Journal of Educational Technology 43(5), 783-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
31. Gourova, E., Asenova, A., & Dulev, P. (2013). Integrated platform for mobile learning, In D. Sampson, P. Isaias, J. M. Spector., & D. Ifenthaler (eds.), Ubiquitous and mobile learning in the digital age (pp. 67-92). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3329-3_5
32. Graves, M. F. (2000). A vocabulary program to complement and bolster a middle grade comprehension program. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 116-135). New York: Teachers College Press.
33. Han, T., & Keskin, F. (2016). Using a mobile application (WhatsApp) to reduce EFL speaking anxiety. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 12, 29-50. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.243
34. Hattem, D., & Lomicka, L. (2016). What the tweets say: A critical analysis of Twitter research in language learning from 2009 to 2016. E-learning and Digital Media, 13(1-2), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016672350
35. Hazaea, A. N., & Alzubi, A. A. (2016). The effectiveness of using mobile on EFL learners’ reading practices in Najran University. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p8
36. Hazaea, A., & Alzubi, A. (2018). Impact of mobile assisted language learning on learner autonomy in EFL reading context. Journal of Language and Education, 4(2), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-2-48-58
37. Hine, N., Rentoul, R., & Specht, M. (2004). Collaboration and roles in remote field trips. In J. Attewell & C. Savill-Smith (Eds.), Learning with mobile devices: Research and development (pp. 69-72). London, UK: Learning Skills and Development Agency.
38. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
39. Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2013). Understanding and implementing the CLT (Communicative Language Teaching) paradigm. RELC Journal, 34(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400102
40. Jafari, S., & Chalak, A. (2016). The role of WhatsApp in teaching vocabulary to Iranian EFL learners at junior high school. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p85512
41. Kartal, G., & Korucu-Kis, S. (2019). The use of Twitter and Youglish for the learning and retention of commonly mispronounced English words. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09970-8
42. Kartal, G., & Özmen, K. S. (2018). An investigation of the professional development agenda of Turkish EFL student teachers. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(3),7-17. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.8.3.14498
43. Kheryadi, K. (2018). The implementation of “WHATSAPP” as a media of English language teaching. Loquen: English Studies Journal,10(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v10i2.685
44. Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students' academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3),643-680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799
45. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language Learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20, 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335
46. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580
47. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge.
48. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615725
49. Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: An experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113706
50. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Liu, G. Z., Lu, H. C., & Lai, C. T. (2016). Towards the construction of a field: The developments and implications of mobile assisted language learning (MALL). Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31(1), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu070
52. Liu, P. L. (2016). Mobile English vocabulary learning based on concept mapping strategy. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 128–140.
53. Maher, J. M., Markey, J. C., & Ebert-May, D. (2013). The other half of the story: effect size analysis in quantitative research. CBE Life Sci Educ, 12, 345–351.
54. Minalla, A. A. (2018). The effect of WhatsApp chat group in enhancing EFL learners’ verbal interaction outside classroom contexts. English Language Teaching, 11(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n3p1
55. Moreira, F., Ferreira, M. J., Pereira, C., & Durão, N. (2016). Collaborative learning supported by mobile devices: A case study in Portuguese High Education Institutions. In Á. Rocha, A.M. Correia, S. Costanzo & L.P. Reis (Eds.), New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31307-8_16
56. Mwakapina, J. W., Mhandeni, A. S., & Nyinondi, O. S. (2016). WhatsApp mobile tool in second language learning: Opportunities, potentials and challenges in higher education settings in Tanzania. International Journal of English Language Education, 4(2), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v4i2.9711
57. Perraton, H. (2000). Rethinking the research agenda. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.5
58. Piccardo, E., North, B., & Goodier, T. (2019). Broadening the scope of language education: Mediation, plurilingualism, and collaborative learning: The CEFR companion volume. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1612.
59. Punch, K. F. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: SAGE.
60. Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 544-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12057
61. Rambe, P., & Chipunza, C. (2013). Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively generated re-sources: A case of WhatsApp instant messaging at a South African University. International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology for Education (ICAICTE). https://doi.org/10.2991/icaicte.2013.66
62. Samaie, M., Mansouri Nejad, A., & Qaracholloo, M. (2018). An inquiry into the efficiency of WhatsApp for self‐ and peer‐assessments of oral language proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12519
63. Saritepeci, M., Duran, A. & Ermiş, U. F. (2019). Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09893-4
64. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
65. Seipel, B. E. (2011). The role of implicit learning in incidental vocabulary acquisition while reading (Unpublished Dissertation), University of Minnesota, MN.
66. Selwyn, N., & Grant, L. (2009). Researching the realities of social software use-an introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902921907
67. Shamsi, A. F., Altaha, S., & Gilanlioglu, I. (2019). The role of m-learning in decreasing speaking anxiety for EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 2(1), 276-282.
68. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00177
69. Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 82-119.
70. Sun, S., Pan, W., & Wang, L. L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 989-1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019507
71. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning. Educational Research Review, 16, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001
72. Şahan, Ö., Çoban, M., & Razı, S. (2016). Students learn English idioms through WhatsApp: Extensive use of smartphones. Journal of Education Faculty, 18(2), 1230-1251. https://doi.org/10.17556/jef.72045
73. Ta’amneh, M. A. A. A. (2017). The effect of using WhatsApp messenger in learning English language among university students. International Research in Education, 5(1), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v5i1.10801.
74. Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary about L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of the input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716401002041
75. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
76. Wahyuni, S., & Febianti, K. (2019). The use of WhatsApp group discussion to improve students’ writing achievement. Indonesian Educational Administration and Leadership Journal (IDEAL), 1(1), 45-51.
77. Yavuz, F. (2016). Do smartphones spur or deter learning: A WhatsApp case study, International Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(3), 408-415, https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890551