Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Disturbance Rejection Performance Comparison of PSO and ZN Methods for Various Disturbance Frequencies

Year 2023, , 17 - 19, 31.03.2023
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1202255

Abstract

In this study Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) control of brushed DC Motor is analyzed. The parameters of the PID controller are tuned with two different approaches, namely Ziegler-Nichols (ZN) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The system is tested under sinusoidal disturbance of varying frequencies in order to evaluate and compare disturbance rejection performances. It is shown that PSO approach has clearly higher performance compared with ZN approach for all disturbance frequencies. Simulations are done using Python programming language with trapezoid rule for differentiation and integration. Results are given in both figures and tables. Comments are done on results and future study is planned.

References

  • K. Khandani, A. A. Jalali and M. Alipoor, (2009). Particle Swarm Optimization based design of disturbance rejection PID controllers for time delay systems. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, pp. 862-866, doi: 10.1109/ICICISYS.2009.5358043.
  • R. A. Krohling and J. P. Rey, (2001). Design of optimal disturbance rejection PID controllers using genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(1);78-82. doi: 10.1109/4235.910467.
  • H.E.A.Ibrahima, F.N.Hassan, Anas O.Shomer. (2014) Optimal PID control of a brushless DC motor using PSO and BF techniques. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2(5);391-398.
  • Baoye Song, Yihui Xiao and Lin Xu (2020). Design of fuzzy PI controller for brushless DC motor based on PSO–GSA algorithm, Systems Science & Control Engineering, 8(1);67-77. DOI: 10.1080/21642583.2020.1723144.
  • Yazgan H, Yener F, Soysal S, Gür A, (2019). Comparison Performances of PSO and GA to Tuning PID Controller for the DC Motor, Sakarya University Journal of Science, 23(2); 162-174.
  • Ziegler J G, Nichols N B, 1942, Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 64(11);759-765.
  • Akyol S, Alataş B, (2012). Current Swarm Intelligence Optimization Algorithms. Nevşehir University Journal of Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 1(1);36-50.
Year 2023, , 17 - 19, 31.03.2023
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1202255

Abstract

References

  • K. Khandani, A. A. Jalali and M. Alipoor, (2009). Particle Swarm Optimization based design of disturbance rejection PID controllers for time delay systems. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, pp. 862-866, doi: 10.1109/ICICISYS.2009.5358043.
  • R. A. Krohling and J. P. Rey, (2001). Design of optimal disturbance rejection PID controllers using genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(1);78-82. doi: 10.1109/4235.910467.
  • H.E.A.Ibrahima, F.N.Hassan, Anas O.Shomer. (2014) Optimal PID control of a brushless DC motor using PSO and BF techniques. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2(5);391-398.
  • Baoye Song, Yihui Xiao and Lin Xu (2020). Design of fuzzy PI controller for brushless DC motor based on PSO–GSA algorithm, Systems Science & Control Engineering, 8(1);67-77. DOI: 10.1080/21642583.2020.1723144.
  • Yazgan H, Yener F, Soysal S, Gür A, (2019). Comparison Performances of PSO and GA to Tuning PID Controller for the DC Motor, Sakarya University Journal of Science, 23(2); 162-174.
  • Ziegler J G, Nichols N B, 1942, Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 64(11);759-765.
  • Akyol S, Alataş B, (2012). Current Swarm Intelligence Optimization Algorithms. Nevşehir University Journal of Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 1(1);36-50.
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Celal Onur Gökçe 0000-0002-5247-7850

Volkan Durusu 0000-0001-7726-5435

Ridvan Unal 0000-0001-6842-7471

Publication Date March 31, 2023
Submission Date November 10, 2022
Acceptance Date January 17, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Gökçe, C. O., Durusu, V., & Unal, R. (2023). Disturbance Rejection Performance Comparison of PSO and ZN Methods for Various Disturbance Frequencies. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 9(1), 17-19. https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1202255