Note
BibTex RIS Cite

An Investigation on Radiation Protection and Shielding Properties of 16 Slice Computed Tomography (CT) Facilities

Year 2018, , 37 - 40, 02.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.408231

Abstract

One of the fundamental principles of radiation
protection is distance factor. In CT facilities maximum dose occurs near gantry
and dose rate is decreases by distance. To know the rate of reduction of the
amount of dose that distance is very important for radiation protection
procedure especially for apply criterias of International Commission on
Radiological Protection (ICRP) on radiation protection. This technical study
aimed to investigate the backscattered dose amount from 16 Slice CT devices for
verification of radiation protection measures in several CT facilities and also
to evaluate the shielding properties of walls of operating room and patient
waiting room. This technical study has been performed in Goztepe Education and
Research Hospital, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Haydarpasa
Education and Research Hospital, Beykoz Education and Research Hospital and
Sancaktepe Education and Research Hospital, respectively. In this study, we
measured the dose rates from the gantry until exit door and behind the door.
The results showed that, backscattered dose amount has been decreased by
distance. We obtained only background radiation in radiographer room and
patient waiting room.  The results showed
also that radiation protection requirements are maximized in investigated
hospitals.
It can be concluded that,
recent method can be applied for various CT facilities for optimum radiation
protection studies which also in discussion with ICRP and IAEA for better
radiation protection and shielding in radiology clinics.

References

  • [1] Wall B.F., Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical x-ray examinations. The British Journal of Radiology, 1997. 70: 437-439.
  • [2] Z. Neeman et.al., CT Fluoroscopy Shielding Decreases in Scattered Radiation for the Patiendt and Operator. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006 Dec; 17(12): 1999–2004.
  • [3] Stoeckelhuber BM, Leibecke T, Schulz E, et al., Radiation dose to the radiologist’s hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2005. 28:589–594
  • [4] D.Richard et.al.,.Patient and Personnel Exposure during CT Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures. RSNA Radiology V. 2000, 216 (1).
  • [5] V.Every, R.J. Petty. Measurements of computed tomography radiation scatter. Australas Phys.Eng. Sci. Med.1992, 15(1) pp.15-24.
  • [6] Stoeckelhuber BM, Leibecke T, Schulz E, et al. (2005). Radiation dose to the radiologist’s hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 28: pp. 589–594.
  • [7] M.Salvado et.al.,(2005). Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 114(1-3):364-8.
Year 2018, , 37 - 40, 02.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.408231

Abstract

References

  • [1] Wall B.F., Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical x-ray examinations. The British Journal of Radiology, 1997. 70: 437-439.
  • [2] Z. Neeman et.al., CT Fluoroscopy Shielding Decreases in Scattered Radiation for the Patiendt and Operator. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006 Dec; 17(12): 1999–2004.
  • [3] Stoeckelhuber BM, Leibecke T, Schulz E, et al., Radiation dose to the radiologist’s hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2005. 28:589–594
  • [4] D.Richard et.al.,.Patient and Personnel Exposure during CT Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures. RSNA Radiology V. 2000, 216 (1).
  • [5] V.Every, R.J. Petty. Measurements of computed tomography radiation scatter. Australas Phys.Eng. Sci. Med.1992, 15(1) pp.15-24.
  • [6] Stoeckelhuber BM, Leibecke T, Schulz E, et al. (2005). Radiation dose to the radiologist’s hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 28: pp. 589–594.
  • [7] M.Salvado et.al.,(2005). Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 114(1-3):364-8.
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Huseyin Ozan Tekin

Baris Cavlı This is me 0000-0002-0997-3488

Elif Ebru Altunsoy This is me 0000-0002-0997-3488

Tugba Manıcı This is me 0000-0002-0997-3488

Ceren Ozturk This is me 0000-0002-0997-3488

Hakki Muammer Karakas This is me 0000-0002-0997-3488

Publication Date July 2, 2018
Submission Date March 21, 2018
Acceptance Date May 18, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

APA Tekin, H. O., Cavlı, B., Altunsoy, E. E., Manıcı, T., et al. (2018). An Investigation on Radiation Protection and Shielding Properties of 16 Slice Computed Tomography (CT) Facilities. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 4(2), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.408231

Cited By



Computation of Neutron Coefficients for B2O3 reinforced Composite
International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1290497


Assessment of Gamma Ray Shielding Properties for Skin
International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1247867




































Simulation of Neutrons Shielding Properties for Some Medical Materials
International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1032359



Fast Neutrons Shielding Properties for HAP-Fe2O3 Composite Materials
International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1012039




Gamma ray shielding parameters of barium tetra titanate (BaTi4O9) ceramic
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
Yonca Yahsi Çelen
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06376-6





Determination of the Radiation Dose Level in Different Slice Computerized Tomography
International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
Osman GÜNAY
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.595645