Experimental Investigation of CSS Assisted by Gas-viscosity Reducer Co-Injection with Different Types of Wells and Heavy Oil

Year 2019, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 9, 31.03.2019

Wei Zhao , Huiqing Lıu Chuan Lu Jing Wang Lin Meng Ruihong Zhong

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.485188

Abstract

The efficiency of conventional thermal recovery methods is limited due to heat loss, steam overlapping and other serious problems. Steam injection assisted by various additives, such as no-condensable gas, solvent and surfactant, has proved to be an effective and beneficial method to improve thermal oil recovery. However, based on literature review, few systematic and comprehensive explanation of the mechanism of the compound system of gas-chemical agent and the application criteria. In this paper, 3D physical experiments with different types of wells and heavy oil were conducted. The additives consist of nitrogen and viscosity reducer (VR). Different injection fluid combinations (single gas, single VR and gas-VR co-injection), fluid injection configurations (gas-steam and gas+steam, VR-steam and VR+steam,) were designed to study the effects of the compound system on oil recovery, oil-steam ratio and oil production rate. The results indicated that steam injection assisted by gas-VR performs well in enhancing the thermal recovery. Some conclusions are drawn according to the variation curves of characteristic parameters. The effects of the compound system still worked and increased the oil recovery after different injection patterns. Meanwhile, the cumulative SOR decreased to the different extent after the corresponding processes sequentially. The distribution of temperature showed that gas-VR co-injection not only inhibited steam overlapping, which promoted the horizontal expansion of the steam chamber but also reduced the viscosity of heavy oil significantly. More oil was produced due to the gas expansion energy. In summary, this work provides a practical understanding of CSS assisted by gas-VR co-injection and optimizing of the injection schemes for different types of reservoirs.

Keywords

Cyclic steam stimulation, EOR, Viscosity reducer, Non-condensable gas

References

• Reference1 C.A. Connally, Jr., J.E. Marberry. Steam Flood Pilot, Nacatoch Sand-Troy Field, Arkansas. SPE-4758-MS presented at Improved Oil Recovery Symposium of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME: 22–24 April, (1974) Tulsa, Okla, USA. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4758-MSReference2Cai, Y. C., et al. A study on the technology of steam - hot water - nitrogen compound drive after steam channeling in steam flooding. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 316-317, 854-859. (2013) DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.316-317.854.Reference3Decker, A. M., & Flock, D. L. Thermal stability and application of emulsion composed blocking agents for steamflooding. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 27(4), 69-78.Reference4Erincik, M. Z., Qi, P., Balhoff, M. T., & Pope, G. A. (2017, October 9). New Method to Reduce Residual Oil Saturation by Polymer Flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI:10.2118/187230-MSReference5 Gates, I. D., & Chakrabarty, N. Design of the steam and solvent injection strategy in expanding-solvent steam-assisted gravity drainage. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 47(9),(2008), 12-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/08-09-12-CSReference6Jha, K. N. (1986). A laboratory study of heavy oil recovery with carbon dioxide. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 25(2), 54-63. (1988) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/SS-85-04.Reference7Liu, Q., Dong, M., & Ma, S. Alkaline surfactant flood potential in western Canadian heavy oil reservoirs. SPE/doe Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. (2006) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/99791-MSReference8Lu, C., Liu, H., Liu, Q., Lu, K., & Wang, L. Research on the Effect of Non-Condensable Gas and Viscosity Reducer for Better SAGD Performance. (2014) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/170026-MS.Reference9Lu, C., Liu, H., & Zhao, W. Visualized study of displacement mechanisms by injecting viscosity reducer and non-condensable gas to assist steam injection. Journal of the Energy Institute, 90(1). (2015) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2015.10.005Reference10Lu, C., Liu, H., Zhao, W., Lu, K., Liu, Y., & Tian, J., et al. Experimental investigation of in-situ emulsion formation to improve viscous-oil recovery in steam-injection process assisted by viscosity reducer. Spe Journal, 22(1). (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/181759-PA.Reference11Lyu, X., et al., "Visualized study of thermochemistry assisted steam flooding to improve oil recovery in heavy oil reservoir with glass micromodels." Fuel 218: 118-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.007Reference12Miller, J. S., & Jones, R. A. A Laboratory Study to Determine Physical Characteristics of Heavy Oil After CO2 Saturation. SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers. (1981) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/9789-MSReference13Pujol L and Boberg T C. Scaling accuracy of laboratory steam flooding models. Paper SPE 4191 Presented at the SPE California Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California. (1972) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/4191-MSReference14Qi, P., Ehrenfried, D. H., Koh, H., & Balhoff, M. T. Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation in Sandstone Cores by Use of Viscoelastic Polymers. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2017). DOI:10.2118/179689-PAReference15Rojas, G. A. Dynamics of subcritical co2/brine floods for heavy-oil recovery. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(1), (1988) 35-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/13598-PA.Reference16 S.R. Upreti, A. Lohi, R.A. Kapadia, et al., Vapor extraction of heavy oil and bitumen: a review, Energy Fuels 21 (3) (2007) 1562-1574. DOI: 10.1021/ef060341jReference17Wang, Y., Ge, J. J., Jiang, P., Zhang, G. C., & Du, Y. Mechanism and Feasibility Study of Nitrogen Assisted Cyclic Steam Stimulation for Ultra-Heavy Oil Reservoir. (2013) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/165212-MSReference18 Zhang Xia, Zhang Xialin. Optimization Study of Production-Injection Ratio for Steam Flooding. IPTC-16458-MS presented at International Petroleum Technology Conference, (2013)26-28 March, Beijing, China. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/16458-MS