BibTex RIS Cite

Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 0 - 0, 12.01.2017

Abstract

This paper is focused on comparing three different immobilized yeast fermentations performance and impact of substrate inhibition on the process. The yeast used for this study was a brewing strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The immobilization techniques used were: entrapment and capsulation method in alginate and immobilization in gelatin structure. Objective of this study was to make a comparison in terms of specific growth rate of microorganisms and kinetic constants.  Fermentations were performed also in different substrate concentrations to study substrate inhibition effect. Fermentations were carried out on beer wort in constant conditions.

As a result we conclude that the capsulated yeast fermentation was almost similar to the free cell process. Substrate inhibition effect was stronger on high concentration substrate fermentation but was noticed a reduced effect of substrate inhibition on immobilized yeast fermentation process compared to free cell performance, as a result of a reduced diffusion effect due to support matrix.(Key words: Fermentation rate, Immobilized yeast, Entrapment, Capsulation, Gel immobilization, Substrate inhibition effect)

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 0 - 0, 12.01.2017

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Vilma Gurazi This is me

Luljeta Xhagolli This is me

Rozana Troja This is me

Terkida Vaso This is me

Dafina Karaj This is me

Publication Date January 12, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Gurazi, V., Xhagolli, L., Troja, R., Vaso, T., et al. (2017). Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology, 3(1).
AMA Gurazi V, Xhagolli L, Troja R, Vaso T, Karaj D. Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition. IJCST. June 2017;3(1).
Chicago Gurazi, Vilma, Luljeta Xhagolli, Rozana Troja, Terkida Vaso, and Dafina Karaj. “Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition”. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology 3, no. 1 (June 2017).
EndNote Gurazi V, Xhagolli L, Troja R, Vaso T, Karaj D (June 1, 2017) Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology 3 1
IEEE V. Gurazi, L. Xhagolli, R. Troja, T. Vaso, and D. Karaj, “Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition”, IJCST, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017.
ISNAD Gurazi, Vilma et al. “Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition”. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology 3/1 (June 2017).
JAMA Gurazi V, Xhagolli L, Troja R, Vaso T, Karaj D. Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition. IJCST. 2017;3.
MLA Gurazi, Vilma et al. “Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition”. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017.
Vancouver Gurazi V, Xhagolli L, Troja R, Vaso T, Karaj D. Impact of Three Different Immobilization Techniques on Batch Fermentation Performance and Substrate Inhibition. IJCST. 2017;3(1).