Heat energy transport characteristics of microchannel reactors for hydrogen production by steam-methanol reforming on copper-based catalysts

Year 2023, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 57 - 66, 30.06.2023

Junjie Chen

https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1060520

Abstract

Numerical simulations are carried out to understand the heat energy transport characteristics of microchannel reactors for hydrogen production by steam-methanol reforming on copper-based catalysts. Enthalpy analysis is performed and the evolution of energy in the oxidation and reforming processes is discussed in terms of reaction heat flux. The effects of solid thermal conductivity, gas velocity, and flow arrangement on the thermal behavior of the reactor is evaluated in order to fully describe the thermal energy change in the reactor. The results indicate that the thermal behavior of the reactor depends upon the thermal properties of the walls. The change in enthalpy is of particular importance in exothermic and endothermic reactions. The net enthalpy change for oxidation and reforming is negative and positive, but the net sensible enthalpy change is always positive in the reactor. The wall
heat conduction effect accompanying temperature changes is important to the autothermal design and self-sustaining operation of the reactor. The solid thermal conductivity is of great importance in determining the operation and efficiency of the reactor. The reaction proceeds rapidly and efficiently only at high solid thermal conductivity. The reaction heat flux for oxidation and reforming is positive and negative. The change in flow arrangement significantly affects the reaction heat flux in the reactor. The parallel flow design is advantageous for purposes of enhancing heat transfer and avoiding localized hot spots.

Keywords

Hydrogen production, thermal properties, reforming reactions, oxidation reactions, flow arrangements, heat fluxes.

References

• [1] T.Y. Amiri, K. Ghasemzageh, and A. Iulianelli. Membrane reactors for sustainable hydrogen production through steam reforming of hydrocarbons: A review. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, Volume 157,2020, Article Number: 108148.
• [2] S. Sá, H. Silva, L. Brandão, J.M. Sousa, and A. Mendes. Catalysts for methanol steam reforming-A review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Volume 99, Issues 1-2, 2010, Pages 43-57.
• [3] I. Dincer, Green methods for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. Volume 37, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 1954-1971.
• [4] N.Z. Muradov and T.N. Veziroǧlu. From hydrocarbon to hydrogen-carbon to hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 30, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 225-237.
• [5] V. Tacchino, P. Costamagna, S. Rosellini, V. Mantelli, and A. Servida. Multi-scale model of a top-fired steam methane reforming reactor and validation with industrial experimental data. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 428, 2022, Article Number: 131492.
• [6] M. Tutar, C.E. Üstün, J.M. Campillo-Robles, R. Fuente, S. Cibrián, I. Arzua, A. Fernández, and G.A. López. Optimized CFD modelling and validation of radiation section of an industrial top-fired steam methane reforming furnace. Computers & Chemical Engineering, Volume 155, 2021, Article Number: 107504.
• [7] J. Wang, S. Wei, Q. Wang, and B. Sundén. Transient numerical modeling and model predictive control of an industrial-scale steam methane reforming reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 46, Issue 29, 2021, Pages 15241-15256.
• [8] M. Taji, M. Farsi, and P. Keshavarz. Real time optimization of steam reforming of methane in an industrial hydrogen plant. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 43, Issue 29, 2018, Pages 13110-13121.
• [9] D.M. Fadzillah, S.K. Kamarudin, M.A. Zainoodin, and M.S. Masdar. Critical challenges in the system development of direct alcohol fuel cells as portable power supplies: An overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 44, Issue 5, 2019, Pages 3031-3054.
• [10] Y. Wang, D.F.R. Diaz, K.S. Chen, Z. Wang, and X.C. Adroher. Materials, technological status, and fundamentals of PEM fuel cells - A review. Materials Today, Volume 32, 2020, Pages 178-203.
• [11] X. Zhang, Y. Jin, D. Li, and Y. Xiong. A review on recent advances in micro-tubular solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 506, 2021, Article Number: 230135.
• [12] M.S. Alias, S.K. Kamarudin, A.M. Zainoodin, and M.S. Masdar. Active direct methanol fuel cell: An overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 45, Issue 38, 2020, Pages 19620-19641.
• [13] M. Luo, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, C.S. Chin, H. Ran, M. Fan, K. Du, and Q. Shuai. Cold start investigation of fuel cell vehicles with coolant preheating strategy. Applied Thermal Engineering, Volume 201, Part B, 2022, Article Number: 117816.
• [14] X. Wei, J. Leng, C. Sun, W. Huo, Q. Ren, and F. Sun. Co-optimization method of speed planning and energy management for fuel cell vehicles through signalized intersections. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 518, 2022, Article Number: 230598.
• [15] M.A. Rakib, J.R. Grace, C.J. Lim, and S.S.E.H. Elnashaie. Steam reforming of heptane in a fluidized bed membrane reactor. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 195, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 5749-5760.
• [16] M.E.E. Abashar. Steam reforming of n-heptane for production of hydrogen and syngas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 38, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 861-869.
• [17] S. Park, J. Yoo, S.J. Han, J.H. Song, E.J. Lee, and I.K. Song. Steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for hydrogen production over nickel-boron-alumina xerogel catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 42, Issue 22, 2017, Pages 15096-15106.
• [18] Y. Bang, S.J. Han, J.G. Seo, M.H. Youn, J.H. Song, and I.K. Song. Hydrogen production by steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG) over ordered mesoporous nickel-alumina catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 37, Issue 23, 2012, Pages 17967-17977.
• [19] Y. Wang, K. Sun, S. Zhang, L. Xu, G. Hu, and X. Hu. Steam reforming of alcohols and carboxylic acids: Importance of carboxyl and alcoholic hydroxyl groups on coke properties. Journal of the Energy Institute, Volume 98, 2021, Pages 85-97.
• [20] Y. Li, L. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Q. Liu, S. Zhang, Q. Liu, G. Hu, Y. Wang, and X. Hu. Steam reforming of the alcohols with varied structures: Impacts of acidic sites of Ni catalysts on coking. Applied Catalysis A: General, Volume 584, 2019, Article Number: 117162.
• [21] Y. Guo, H. Li, and H. Kameyama. Steam reforming of kerosene over a metal-monolithic alumina-supported Ru catalyst: Effect of preparation conditions and electrical-heating test. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 66, Issue 23, 2011, Pages 6287-6296.
• [22] L.A. Chick, O.A. Marina, C.A. Coyle, and E.C. Thomsen. Effects of temperature and pressure on the performance of a solid oxide fuel cell running on steam reformate of kerosene. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 236, 2013, Pages 341-349.
• [23] M. Koga and T. Watanabe. Plate type reformer. United States Patent Number: 5015444, Assignee: Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Date of Patent: May 14, 1991, Application Number: 7.243334.
• [24] A. Igarashi, C. Fukuhara, S. Takeshita, C. Nishino, and M. Hanawa. Apparatus and method for preparing reformed gas by means of electroless plating. United States Patent Number: 5167865, Assignee: Mitsubishi Petrochemical Engineering Company Limited, Tokyo, Date of Patent: December 1, 1992, Application Number: 7.574099.
• [25] C. Fukuhara and A. Igarashi. Performance simulation of a wall-type reactor in which exothermic and endothermic reactions proceed simultaneously, comparing with that of a fixed-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 60, Issue 24, 2005, Pages 6824-6834.
• [26] Y. Kawamura, N. Ogura, T. Yamamoto, and A. Igarashi. A miniaturized methanol reformer with Si-based microreactor for a small PEMFC. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 61, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1092-1101.
• [27] T. Ioannides and X.E. Verykios. Development of a novel heat-integrated wall reactor for the partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas. Catalysis Today, Volume 46, Issues 2-3, 1998, Pages 71-81.
• [28] A. Piga and X.E. Verykios, An advanced reactor configuration for the partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas. Catalysis Today, Volume 60, Issues 1-2, 2000, Pages 63-71.
• [29] D.A. Loffler, C.E. Faz, V. Sokolovskii, and E. Iglesia. Catalytic separator plate reactor and method of catalytic reforming of fuel to hydrogen. United States Patent Publication Number: 20020168308, Publication Date: November 14, 2002, Application Number: 09972142.
• [30] D. Loffler. Systems and methods for generating hydrogen from hycrocarbon fuels. United States Patent Publication Number: 20050229491, Applicant: Nu Element, Inc., Tacoma, Washington, Publication Date: October 20, 2005, Application Number: 11.050371.
• [31] A.L. Tonkovich, G. Roberts, S.T. Perry, S.P. Fitzgerald, R.S. Wegeng, Y. Wang, D. Vanderwiel, and J.L. Marco. Integrated reactors, methods of making same, and methods of conducting simultaneous exothermic and endothermic reactions. United States Patent Number: 9452402, Assignee: Battelle Memorial Institute, Richland, Washington, Publication Date: September 27, 2016, Application Number: 14.053500.
• [32] A.L. Tonkovich, G.L. Roberts, S.T. Perry, and S.P. Fitzgerald. Methods of conducting simultaneous exothermic and endothermic reactions. United States Patent Number: 6969506, Assignee: Battelle Memorial Institute, Richland, Washington, Publication Date: November 29, 2005, Application Number: 10.076875.
• [33] R.C. Brown. Process intensification through directly coupled autothermal operation of chemical reactors. Joule, Volume 4, Issue 11, 2020, Pages 2268-2289.
• [34] A.Y. Tonkovich, S. Perry, Y. Wang, D. Qiu, T. LaPlante, and W.A. Rogers. Microchannel process technology for compact methane steam reforming. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 59, Issues 22-23, 2004, Pages 4819-4824.
• [35] S. Roychowdhury, T. Sundararajan, and S.K. Das. Conjugate heat transfer studies on steam reforming of ethanol in micro-channel systems. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Volume 139, 2019, Pages 660-674.
• [36] A.L.Y. Tonkovich, B. Yang, S.T. Perry, S.P. Fitzgerald, and Y. Wang. From seconds to milliseconds to microseconds through tailored microchannel reactor design of a steam methane reformer. Catalysis Today, Volume 120, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 21-29.
• [37] A. Tonkovich, D. Kuhlmann, A. Rogers, J. McDaniel, S. Fitzgerald, R. Arora, and T. Yuschak. Microchannel technology scale-up to commercial capacity. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Volume 83, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 634-639.
• [38] A. Gavriilidis, P. Angeli, E. Cao, K.K. Yeong, and Y.S.S. Wan. Technology and applications of microengineered reactors. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Volume 80, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 3-30.
• [39] M.S. Mettler, G.D. Stefanidis, and D.G. Vlachos. Enhancing stability in parallel plate microreactor stacks for syngas production. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 66, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1051-1059.
• [40] C. Cao, N. Zhang, D. Dang, and Y. Cheng. Numerical evaluation of a microchannel methane reformer used for miniaturized GTL: Operating characteristics and greenhouse gases emission. Fuel Processing Technology, Volume 167, 2017, Pages 78-91.
• [41] J.J. Lerou, A.L. Tonkovich, L. Silva, S. Perry, and J. McDaniel. Microchannel reactor architecture enables greener processes. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 65, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 380-385.
• [42] D.M. Murphy, A. Manerbino, M. Parker, J. Blasi, R.J. Kee, and N.P. Sullivan. Methane steam reforming in a novel ceramic microchannel reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 38, Issue 21, 2013, Pages 8741-8750.
• [43] M. Baldea and P. Daoutidis. Dynamics and control of autothermal reactors for the production of hydrogen. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 62, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 3218-3230.
• [44] M. Zanfir and A. Gavriilidis. Influence of flow arrangement in catalytic plate reactors for methane steam reforming. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Volume 82, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 252-258.
• [45] G. Kolios, J. Frauhammer, and G. Eigenberger. Autothermal fixed-bed reactor concepts. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 55, Issue 24, 2000, Pages 5945-5967.
• [46] T.P. Tiemersma, T. Kolkman, J.A.M. Kuipers, and M.V.S. Annaland. A novel autothermal reactor concept for thermal coupling of the exothermic oxidative coupling and endothermic steam reforming of methane. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 203, 2012, Pages 223-230.
• [47] M.S. Herdem, M. Mundhwa, S. Farhad, and F. Hamdullahpur. Catalyst layer design and arrangement to improve the performance of a microchannel methanol steam reformer. Energy Conversion and Management, Volume 180, 2019, Pages 149-161.
• [48] N. Engelbrecht, R.C. Everson, D. Bessarabov, and G. Kolb. Microchannel reactor heat-exchangers: A review of design strategies for the effective thermal coupling of gas phase reactions. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, Volume 157, 2020, Article Number: 108164.
• [49] T.L. Reitz, S. Ahmed, M. Krumpelt, R. Kumar, and H.H. Kung. Characterization of CuO/ZnO under oxidizing conditions for the oxidative methanol reforming reaction. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, Volume 162, Issues 1-2, 2000, Pages 275-285.
• [50] B.A. Peppley, J.C. Amphlett, L.M. Kearns, and R.F. Mann. Methanol-steam reforming on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts. Part 2. A comprehensive kinetic model. Applied Catalysis A: General, Volume 179, Issues 1-2, 1999, Pages 31-49.
• [51] G.-G. Park, D.J. Seo, S.-H. Park, Y.-G. Yoon, C.-S. Kim, and W.-L. Yoon. Development of microchannel methanol steam reformer. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 101, Issues 1-3, 2004, Pages 87-92.
• [52] G.-G. Park, S.-D. Yim, Y.-G. Yoon, C.-S. Kim, D.-J. Seo, and K. Eguchi. Hydrogen production with integrated microchannel fuel processor using methanol for portable fuel cell systems. Catalysis Today, Volume 110, Issues 1-2, 2005, Pages 108-113.
• [53] X. Chu, X. Zeng, T. Zheng, W. Zhuang, Y. Yang, W. Zhou, and Y. Hong. Structural design and performance research of methanol steam reforming microchannel for hydrogen production based on mixing effect. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 45, Issue 41, 2020, Pages 20859-20874.
• [54] W. Lu, R. Zhang, S. Toan, R. Xu, F. Zhou, Z. Sun, and Z. Sun. Microchannel structure design for hydrogen supply from methanol steam reforming. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 429, 2022, Article Number: 132286.
• [55] G.D. Stefanidis, D.G. Vlachos, N.S. Kaisare, and M. Maestri. Methane steam reforming at microscales: Operation strategies for variable power output at millisecond contact times. AIChE Journal, Volume 55, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 180-191.
• [56] G.D. Stefanidis and D.G. Vlachos. Millisecond methane steam reforming via process and catalyst intensification. Chemical Engineering & Technology, Volume 31, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1201-1209.
• [57] M. Zanfir and A. Gavriilidis. Catalytic combustion assisted methane steam reforming in a catalytic plate reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 58, Issue 17, 2003, Pages 3947-3960.
• [58] C. Cao, D. Dang, Y. Li, J. Xu, and Y. Cheng. Managing temperature uniformity of thermally integrated micro reformers with different axial dimensions: A detailed numerical study. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, Volume 132, 2018, Pages 218-228.