CONTENT ANALYSIS OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS RELATED TO MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISOR TOOTH MANIPULATION

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today video sharing platforms on Internet like Youtube has become an important source of information in many areas like health. purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the suitability, usefulness, and quality of Youtube video contents related to 'Maxillary Central Incisive Tooth Manipulation’ used by dentistry students for first-year preclinical education. MATERIAL and METHODS: A scoring system consisting of 10 parameters was used to asses the video content quality. The viewership, likes, comments, reliability of information, global quality scores(GQS), and video duration were recorded for evaluation with parameters by two dentists according to the uploader (dentist, dentistry student, dental technician) and the information content (high, medium, poor quality). Group comparisons were analysed using the Kruskal Wallis H and post-hoc Tamhane’s T2 test. RESULTS: 20 relevant videos were classified as 55% high(GQS 4.7±0.6), 35% medium(GQS 3.3±1.6), and 10% considered poor quality(GQS 1.0±0). Evaluated according to their quality, no significant difference was found between the parameters except GQS(p=0.013). The videos are as follows, in order of their sources: dentists(n=6,30%), dentistry students(n=11,55%) and dental technicians(n=3,15%). CONCLUSION: The fact that there was no difference in the viewing and popularity of useful and misleading videos revealed that the high quality video could not be chosen by the video viewers. In this study, it was concluded that dentistry students should pay particular attention to the video provider while providing video access to support their preclinical education. Health academics and health institutions need to increase studies on 'pre-clinical practice courses' and try to raise awareness by uploading more useful and systematic videos to the internet/YouTube.

Keywords

• dental education
• digital technology
• E-health
• Internet
• YouTube

MAXİLLER SANTRAL KESİCİ DİŞ YONTUSUİLE İLGİLİ YOUTUBE VİDEOLARININ İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Abstract

AMAÇ: Günümüzde internet üzerindeki Youtube ve benzeri video paylaşım platformları sağlık gibi birçok alanda önemli bir bilgi kaynağı haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, diş hekimliği öğrencilerinin 1. sınıf klinik öncesi eğitim için kullandıkları 'Maxiller Santral Kesici Diş Yontusu' ile ilgili Youtube içeriklerin uygunluğunu, kullanışlılığını ve kalitesini değerlendirmektir. MATERYAL ve METOD: Video içerik kalitesini değerlendirmek için 10 parametreden oluşan bir puanlama sistemi kullanıldı. Videoların kaynağına (diş hekimi, diş hekimliği öğrencisi, diş teknisyeni) ve bilgi içeriğine (yüksek, orta, düşük kalite) göre grup karşılaştırmaları Kruskal Wallis H ve post-hoc Tamhane T2 testi kullanılarak analiz edildi. BULGULAR: Çalışmada 20 ilgili video %55 yüksek (GQS 4,7±0,6), %35 orta (GQS 3,3±1,6) ve %10'u düşük kaliteli (GQS 1,0±0) olarak sınıflandırıldı. Kalitelerine göre değerlendirildiğinde, GQS dışındaki parametreler arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı(p=0,013). Videolar yükleyicilerine göre diş hekimleri(n=%6,30), diş hekimliği öğrencileri(n=%11,55) ve diş teknisyenleri(n=%3,15) şeklindedir. SONUÇLAR : Yararlı ve yanıltıcı videoların izlenme ve popülaritesinde bir fark olmaması video izleyicileri tarafından kaliteli videonun seçilemediğini ortaya koymuştur. Çalışmamızda diş hekimliği öğrencilerinin preklinik eğitimlerine destek amacıyla video erişimini sağlarken özellikle video sağlayıcısına dikkat etmesi gerekliliği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Sağlık akademisyenleri ve sağlık kurumlarının 'klinik öncesi uygulama dersleri' ile ilgili çalışmaları artırması ve internete/YouTube'a daha faydalı ve sistemli videolar yükleyerek farkındalık yaratmaya çalışması gerekmektedir.

Keywords

• dijital teknoloji
• E-sağlık
• YouTube
• Internet
• dental eğitim

References

1. 1. Korkmaz YN, Buyuk SK. YouTube as a Patient-Information Source for Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(3):327-332.
2. 2. Ceylan H., Demir G. & Elri, Z.. Internet speed issue of Turkey . International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research 2021;3(2):121-132 .
3. 3. Alp Y., Kaleci D. Student feedback on the use of videos on YouTube as educational material. International Journal of Active Learning, 2018; 3(1):57-68.
4. 4. Smith PE, McGuire J, Falci M, Poudel DR, Kaufman R, Patterson MA, et al. Analysis of YouTube as a source of information for diabetic foot care. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2019;109:122- 6. 5. Vardarlıer P. & Öztürk C. The role of health communication and social media channels in health promotion. Sosyolojik Düşün , 2020;5(1):1-18.
5. 6. Telli S. G., Altun D.. Coronavirüs ve çevrimiçi (online) eğitimin önlenemeyen yükselişi. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020;3(1):25-34.
6. 7. Özdal ÖZ, Bozkurt AP, Gaş S. Potential Patient Education of YouTube Videos Related to Wisdom Tooth Surgical Removal. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:e481-4.
7. 8.Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016;22:202-8.
8. 9. Ayranci F, Buyuk SK, Kahveci K. Are YouTube™ videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020:S2468-7855(20):30091-4.

9. 10. Savoldi F, Yeung AWK, Tanaka R, Mohammad Zadeh LS, Montalvao C, Bornstein MM, et al. Dry Skulls and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for Teaching Orofacial Bone Anatomy to Undergraduate Dental Students. Anat Sci Educ .2021;14(1):62–70.
10. 11.Akaltan KF. Diversity of preclinical and clinical education in dentistry. Selcuk Dental Journal, 2019;6(5), 37-51.
11. 12. Giuliani M, Lajolo C, Clemente L, Querqui A, Viotti R, Boari A, et al. Is manual dexterity essential in the selection of dental students? Br Dent J .2007;203(3):149–55.
12. 13. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e82469
13. 14. Duman C. YouTube™ quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. Int J Dent Hyg 2020;18:261-7.
14. 15. Singh AG., Singh S, Singh PP. "YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis ,a wakeup call?." The Journal of rheumatology 2012;39(5):899-903.
15. 16. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;21:173-94.
16. 17. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan H. YouTube as a patient‐ information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2016;49:1194-200.
17. 18. Bozkurt AP, Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ. YouTube video analysis as a source of information for patients on impacted canine. Int Orthod. 2019;17:769-75.
18. 19. Kaya D. I. , Aktı A. , Najafi F. , Karakaya K. Evaluation Of The Videos About Intraoral Devices For Bruxism On YouTube. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2022;9(1):167-172.
19. 20.Yağcı F. Evaluation of YouTube as a source of information about digital dentistry. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2021;8(2):296-302.
20. 21. Demirsoy K, Kaplan M, Büyük S. Evaluation of Information Reliability and Quality of Youtube™ Videos About White Spot Lesions. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;12(1):87-94.
21. 22. Kieser J., Livingstone V., Meldrum A. Professional storytelling in clinical dental anatomy teaching. Anatomical sciences education. 2008;1(2):84-89.
22. 23. De Azevedo, Renato A. "Optimizing quality of dental carving by preclinical dental students through anatomy theory reinforcement." Anatomical sciences education. 2018;11(4):377-384.