Clinical Research
BibTex RIS Cite

Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible with the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Year 2022, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 7 - 10, 29.04.2022

Mehmet Emin Doğan Eda Didem Yalçın

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the relationship of dental implants made in the
mandible with the lingual foramen by typing according to the safety margin.
Material method: In our study, images taken with a Planmeca 3D Mid (ProMax, Helsinki, Finland) cone-beam
computed tomography device between 2017-2021 were used. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to examine the
suitability of the available data for normal distribution. Relationships between categorical variables were calculated
with the 'Chi-square test'.
Results: Cone beam computed tomography images of 450 implants in the mandible were evaluated in multiplanar
planes in a total of 250 patients, 110 (44%) men and 140 (56%) women. According to the evaluation of the implants
with the lingual foramen, type 1; 0 (0.0%), type 2; 3 (0.7%), type 3; It was determined as 30 (6.7%).
Conclusion: No relationship was observed with the lingual foramen in 92.7% of the implants. There was no
statistically significant difference between the lingual foramen and typing according to gender.

Keywords

Cone beam computed tomography mandible dental implant lingual foramen

References

  • 1. McDonnell D, Nouri MR, Todd M. The mandibular lingual foramen: a consistent arterial foramen in the middle of the mandible. J Anat. 1994;184( 2):363.
  • 2. Tagaya A, Matsuda Y, Nakajima K, Seki K, Okano T. Assessment of the blood supply to the lingual surface of the mandible for reduction of bleeding during implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(4):351-5.
  • 3. Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Liang X, Martens W, Mraiwa N, Adriaensens P, et al. Neurovascularization of the anterior jaw bones revisited using highresolution magnetic resonance imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(5):683-93.
  • 4. Pommer B, Tepper G, Gahleitner A, Zechner W, Watzek G. New safety margins for chin bone harvesting based on the course of the mandibular incisive canal in CT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(12):1312-6.
  • 5. Liang X, Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Vandewalle G. Lingual foramina on the mandibular midline revisited: a macroanatomical study. Clin Anat. 2007;20(3):246-51.
  • 6. Madeira MC, Percinoto C, Maria das Graças MS. Clinical significance of supplementary innervation of the lower incisor teeth: a dissection study of the mylohyoid nerve. . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978;46(5):608-14.
  • 7. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. Clinical assessment and surgical implications of anatomic challenges in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(4):219-25.
  • 8. Lascala C, Panella J, Marques M. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCTNewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(5):291-4.
  • 9. Sbordone L, Menchini-Fabris G, Toti P, Sbordone C, Califano L, Guidetti F. Clinical survey of neurosensory side-effects of mandibular parasymphyseal bone harvesting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(2):139-45.
  • 10. Fokas G, Vaughn VM, Scarfe WC, Bornstein MM. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:393-415.
  • 11. Celik E. İmplant Uygulamalarında Diagnostik Protezler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont-Special Topics. 2016;2(3):45-51.
  • 12. Liaw K, Delfini RH, Abrahams JJ. Dental Implant Complications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015; 36: 427-33.
  • 13. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(4).
  • 14. Langland OE, Langlais RP. Early pioneers of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80(5):496-511.
  • 15. Genc T. Radiological Evaluation of Anatomical Structures and Variations in Maxilla and Mandible Before Dental Implant Treatment. 2014.

Year 2022, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 7 - 10, 29.04.2022

Mehmet Emin Doğan Eda Didem Yalçın

Abstract

References

  • 1. McDonnell D, Nouri MR, Todd M. The mandibular lingual foramen: a consistent arterial foramen in the middle of the mandible. J Anat. 1994;184( 2):363.
  • 2. Tagaya A, Matsuda Y, Nakajima K, Seki K, Okano T. Assessment of the blood supply to the lingual surface of the mandible for reduction of bleeding during implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(4):351-5.
  • 3. Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Liang X, Martens W, Mraiwa N, Adriaensens P, et al. Neurovascularization of the anterior jaw bones revisited using highresolution magnetic resonance imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(5):683-93.
  • 4. Pommer B, Tepper G, Gahleitner A, Zechner W, Watzek G. New safety margins for chin bone harvesting based on the course of the mandibular incisive canal in CT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(12):1312-6.
  • 5. Liang X, Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Vandewalle G. Lingual foramina on the mandibular midline revisited: a macroanatomical study. Clin Anat. 2007;20(3):246-51.
  • 6. Madeira MC, Percinoto C, Maria das Graças MS. Clinical significance of supplementary innervation of the lower incisor teeth: a dissection study of the mylohyoid nerve. . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978;46(5):608-14.
  • 7. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. Clinical assessment and surgical implications of anatomic challenges in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(4):219-25.
  • 8. Lascala C, Panella J, Marques M. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCTNewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(5):291-4.
  • 9. Sbordone L, Menchini-Fabris G, Toti P, Sbordone C, Califano L, Guidetti F. Clinical survey of neurosensory side-effects of mandibular parasymphyseal bone harvesting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(2):139-45.
  • 10. Fokas G, Vaughn VM, Scarfe WC, Bornstein MM. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:393-415.
  • 11. Celik E. İmplant Uygulamalarında Diagnostik Protezler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont-Special Topics. 2016;2(3):45-51.
  • 12. Liaw K, Delfini RH, Abrahams JJ. Dental Implant Complications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015; 36: 427-33.
  • 13. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(4).
  • 14. Langland OE, Langlais RP. Early pioneers of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80(5):496-511.
  • 15. Genc T. Radiological Evaluation of Anatomical Structures and Variations in Maxilla and Mandible Before Dental Implant Treatment. 2014.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Mehmet Emin Doğan This is me

Eda Didem Yalçın This is me

Publication Date April 29, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Doğan, M. E., & Yalçın, E. D. (2022). Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible with the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research, 2(1), 7-10.
AMA Doğan ME, Yalçın ED. Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible with the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. HRU Int J Dent Oral Res. April 2022;2(1):7-10.
Chicago Doğan, Mehmet Emin, and Eda Didem Yalçın. “Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible With the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography”. HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research 2, no. 1 (April 2022): 7-10.
EndNote Doğan ME, Yalçın ED (April 1, 2022) Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible with the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research 2 1 7–10.
IEEE M. E. Doğan and E. D. Yalçın, “Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible with the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography”, HRU Int J Dent Oral Res, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2022.
ISNAD Doğan, Mehmet Emin - Yalçın, Eda Didem. “Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible With the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography”. HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research 2/1 (April 2022), 7-10.
JAMA Doğan ME, Yalçın ED. Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible with the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. HRU Int J Dent Oral Res. 2022;2:7–10.
MLA Doğan, Mehmet Emin and Eda Didem Yalçın. “Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible With the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography”. HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, pp. 7-10.
Vancouver Doğan ME, Yalçın ED. Investigation of the Relationship of Dental Implants in the Mandible with the Lingual Foramen by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. HRU Int J Dent Oral Res. 2022;2(1):7-10.
 Download Cover Image