Retrospective Evaluation of Mandibular Canal Position with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Individuals aged 7-18

Year 2021, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 31 - 38, 29.12.2021

Hatice Kübra Başkan Emin Caner Tümer Beyhan Başkan Özlem Akyüz Begeç

Abstract

Aim:In our study, in individuals aged 7-18, according to gender and age, using cone beam computed tomography
images (CBCT); This study was carried out retrospectively in order to obtain more detailed information about the
differences in the distance of the mandibular canal to the surrounding anatomical structures, to guide dentistry
applications such as endodontic treatment and surgical procedures and to prevent complications.
Material and Method:This study, tomography images of 120 individuals who met our research criteria were
divided into 6 groups according to age, and measurements were made in 240 hemi-mandibles. Measurements related
to the mandibular canal; Evaluated on CBCT data. The differences between the groups were examined with various
statistical tests.
Results:Statistically significant differences were determined between gender and age groups in some parameters
in the measurements performed on the mandibular canal (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found
between the right and left sides of the individual in all of the measurements we performed (p>0.05).
Conclusion:Our study, the mean values of the anatomical points measured were determined. We believe that
these values can be a guide in pediatric and general dentistry practices.

Keywords

Mandibular canal, cone beam computed tomography, retrospective study.

7-18 Yaş Arası Bireylerde Mandibular Kanal Konumunun Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile Retrospektif Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmamız 7-18 yaş aralığındaki bireylerde cinsiyet ve yaşa göre, konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi
görüntüleri kullanılarak (KIBT); mandibular kanalın çevre anatomik yapılara olan uzaklık farklılıkları hakkında daha
detaylı bilgi elde edilmesi ile endodontik tedavi, cerrahi işlemler gibi diş hekimliği uygulamalarında rehber olunması
ve komplikasyonların önlenebilmesi amacıyla retrospektif olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda, araştırma kriterlerimize uygun 120 bireyin tomografi görüntüsü yaşa göre 6
gruba ayrılmış ve 240 hemi-mandibulada ölçümler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Mandibular kanal ile ilgili ölçümler; KIBT
verileri üzerinde değerlendirilmiştir. Gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar çeşitli istatistiksel testler ile incelenmiştir.
Bulgular: Mandibular kanal ile ilgili gerçekleştirilen ölçümlerde bazı parametrelerde cinsiyet ve yaş grupları
arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar belirlendi (p<0,05). Gerçekleştirdiğimiz ölçümlerin tümünde bireyin
sağ ve sol tarafı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık tespit edilmedi (p>0,05).
Sonuç: Çalışmamızda, ölçümü yapılan anatomik noktalara ilişkin ortalama değerler tespit edilmiştir. Bu
değerlerin çocuk ve genel diş hekimliği uygulamalarında rehber olabileceği kanaatindeyiz

Keywords

Mandibular kanal, konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi, retrospektif çalışma.

References

• 1. Cartes G, Garay I, Deana NF, Navarro P, Alves N. Mandibular Canal Course and the Position of the Mental Foramen by Panoramic X-Ray in Chilean Individuals. Biomed Res Int. 2018: 1-10.
• 2. Fehrenbach M. J, Herring SW. Illustrated Anatomy Of The Head AndNeck. 5 th ed. 2015: 197-226.
• 3. Mayil M, Keser G, Pekiner FN. Maksillofasiyal Bölgedeki Anatomik Noktaların CBCT Görüntüleri. Clinical And Experimental HealthSciences. 2015;4(4): 232-240.
• 4. Koivisto T, Chiona D, Milroy LL, McClanahan SB, Ahmad M, Bowles WR. Mandibular Canal Location: Cone-beam Computed TomographyExamination. J Endod.2016;42(7):1018-1021.
• 5. Fanibunda K, Whitworth J, Steele J. The Management Of Thermomechanically Compacted Gutta Percha Extrusion In The Inferior Dental Canal. BrDent J. 1998;184(7):330-332.
• 6. Escoda-Francoli J, Canalda-Sahli C, Soler A, Figueiredo R, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior Alveolar Nerve Damage Because Of OverextendedEndodontic Material: A Problem Of Sealer Cement Biocompatibility? J Endod. 2007;33(12):1484-1489.
• 7. Yılmaz Z, Uzunoglu E, Erdogan O. Kök Kanal Dolgu Patının Mandibular Kanala Taşması Sonucu Oluşan Inferior Alveolar Sinir Hasarı: Bir Vaka Raporu. Türk Endod J. 2016; 1(2): 91-95.
• 8. Renton T, Dawood A, Shah A, Searson L, Yilmaz Z. Post-ImplantNeuropathy Of The Trigeminal Nerve. A Case Series. BrDent J. 2012;212(11):1-6.
• 9. Güneşer MB. Periapikal Enfeksiyonun Sebep Olduğu Mental Sinirin Geçici Parestezisi: Olgu Sunumu. Selcuk Dent J. 2016; 3(3): 135-139.
• 10. Yeler H, Ozec L, Kilic E. Infection-Related Inferior Alveolar AndMental Nerve Paresthesia. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(4): 313-316.
• 11. Nance R, Tyndall D, Levin LG, Trope M. Identification Of Root CanalsIn Molars By Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography. Int Endod J. 2000;(4):392-396.
• 12. Polland KE, Munro S, Reford G, Lockhart A, Logan G, Brocklebank L, et al. The Mandibular Canal Of The Edentulous Jaw. Clinical AnatomyThe Official Journal of the American Association of Clin Anat. 2001;14(6):445-452.
• 13. Gerlach NL, Ghaeminia H, Bronkhorst EM, Berge SJ, Meijer GJ, Maal TJ. Accuracy Of Assessing The Mandibular Canal On Cone-BeamComputed Tomography: A Validation Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(4):666-671.
• 14. Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen K. Factors AffectingNeurosensory Disturbance After Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal SplitOsteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(11):1234-1239.
• 15. Walter JJ, Gregg J. Analysis Of Postsurgical Neurologic Alteration InThe Trigeminal Nerve. J Oral Surg. (American Dental Association: 1965). 1979;37(6):410-414.
• 16. Turvey TA. Intraoperative Complications Of Sagittal Osteotomy Of TheMandibular Ramus: Incidence And Management. J Oral MaxillofacSurg. 1985;43(7):504-509.
• 17. Hur MS, Kim HC, Won SY, Hu KS, Song WC, Koh KS, Et Al. Topography And Spatial Fascicular Arrangement Of The Human Inferior Alveolar Nerve. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(1):88-95.
• 18. Khorshidi H, Raoofi S, Ghapanchi J, Shahidi S, Paknahad M. ConeBeam Computed Tomographic Analysis Of The Course And Position Of Mandibular Canal. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017;16(3):306-311.
• 19. Cantekin K, Sekerci AE, Miloglu O, Buyuk SK. Identification Of TheMandibular Landmarks In A Pediatric Population. Med Oral Patol OralCir Bucal. 2014;19(2):136-141.
• 20. Hwang K, Lee WJ, Song YB, Chung IH. Vulnerability Of The InferiorAlveolar Nerve And Mental Nerve During Genioplasty: An Anatomic Study. J Craniof Surg. 2005;16(1):10-14.
• 21. Massey ND, Galil KA, Wilson TD. Determining Position Of The Inferior Alveolar Nerve Via Anatomical Dissection And MicroComputed Tomography In Preparation For Dental Implants. J Can Dent Assoc. 2013;79(d39):1-7.
• 22. De Oliveira Junior MR, Saud ALS, Fonseca DR, De-Ary-Pires B, PiresNeto MA, de Ary-Pires R. Morphometrical Analysis Of The Human Mandibular Canal: A CT Investigation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33(4):345-352.
• 23. Levine MH, Goddard AL, Dodson TB. Inferior Alveolar Nerve Canal Position: A Clinical And Radiographic Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(3):470-474.
• 24. Kilic C, Kamburoğlu K, Ozen T, Balcioglu H, Kurt B, Kutoglu T, et al. ThePosition Of The Mandibular Canal And Histologic Feature Of The Inferior Alveolar Nerve. Cin Anat. 2010;23(1):34-42.
• 25. Chen JC-H, Lin L-M, Geist JR, Chen J-Y, Chen C-H, Chen Y-K. A Retrospective Comparison Of The Location And Diameter Of The Inferior Alveolar Canal At The Mental Foramen And Length Of The Anterior Loop Between American And Taiwanese Cohorts Using CBCT. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(1):11-18.
• 26. Chirita A. The Position Of The Mandibular Canal Between The Mandibular Cortical Plates: A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Anal-Ysis. Ann Dentist Oral Dis 2018;1:101-108.
• 27. Hsu J-T, Huang H-L, Fuh L-J, Li R-W, Wu J, Tsai M-T, et al. Location Of The Mandibular Canal And Thickness Of The Occlusal Cortical Bone At Dental Implant Sites In The Lower Second Premolar And First Molar. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013:1-8.
• 28. Kieser J, Kieser D, Hauman T. The course and distribution of the inferior alveolar nerve in the edentulous mandible. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16(1):6-9.
• 29. Sekerci AE, Sahman H. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analyses Of The Position And Course Of The Mandibular Canal: Relevance ToThe Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy. Biomed Res Int. 2014:1-11.
• 30. De Oliveira Gamba T, Alves MC, Haiter-Neto F. Analysis Of SexualDimorphism By Locating The Mandibular Canal In Images Of ConeBeam Computed Tomography. Journal Of Forensic Radiology AndImaging 2014;2(2): 72-76.
• 31. Kalabalik F, Aytuğar E. Localization of the Mandibular Canal in a Turkish Population: a Retrospective Cone-Beam ComputedTomography Study. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019;10(2):1-7.
• 32. Narayana K, Vasudha S. Intraosseous Course Of The Inferior Alveolar (Dental) Nerve And Its Relative Position In The Mandible. Indian J DentRes. 2004;15(3):99-102