Evaluation of FMS Scores of Competitive CrossFit Athletes by Gender

Year 2023, , 134 - 141, 25.10.2023

Yeliz Yol

https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1351767

Abstract

Functional Movement Screening System (FMS) is a testing and assessment protocol used to evaluate the body movement and movement capacity of athletes or physically active individuals. Analysis of FMS scores by gender can provide important information to personalize training programs, identify weak points, and improve the movement quality of athletes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the FMS scores of competitive CrossFit athletes according to gender. A total of 22 athletes, 14 males with a mean age of 26.79±5.16 years and 8 females with a mean age of 32.38±3.74 years participated in the study. Participants were administered the FMS™ test consisting of seven tasks (per the FMS™ manual). In the analysis of the data, after the normality distribution was made, the Man-Whitney U test was performed for the data that did not show the normal distribution in an independent two-group comparison. A statistically significant difference was found in the right(p=0.04) and left (p=0.04) shoulder mobility score, shoulder mobility final score (p=0.01), and active straight leg raise score-right (p=0.02) measurements of the athletes according to gender. As a result, females were found to have higher 'shoulder mobility' and 'active straight leg raising' scores than males on a movement basis. In addition, the total FMS scores were found to be above average for both genders.

Keywords

Crossfit, FMS, Gender, Injury prevention

Ethical Statement

"Müsabik Crossfit Sporcularının Cinsiyete Göre FMS Skorlarının Değerlendirilmesi" başlıklı proje önerisi kurul tarafından etik açıdan uygun bulunmuştur.

Supporting Institution

SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ- HAMİDİYE BİLİMSEL ARAŞTIRMALAR ETİK KURULU

Project Number

23/494

References

• Bardenett, S.M., Micca, J.J., DeNoyelles, J.T., Miller, S.D., Jenk, D.T., Brooks, G.S. (2015). Functional movement screen normative values and validity in high school athletes: Can the FMS be used as a predictor of injury? Int J Sports Phys Ther;10(3):303-308.
• Chorba, R.S., Chorba, D.J., Bouillon, L.E., Overmyer, C.O., Landis, J.A. (2010). Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 5(2):47-54
• Claudino, J.G., Gabbett, T.J., Bourgeois, F., et al. (2018). Crossfit overview: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Open; 26;4(1):11
• Clifford, C. (2016). The Founder Of Crossfit Credits His Success To One Simple Secret. In: CNBC.
• Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B. (2006). Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther;1:62–72.
• Cook, G., Burton, M., Hoogenboom, B., Voight, M. (2014). Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function. Int J Sports Phys Ther; 9(3):396-409.
• Feito, Y., Heinrich, K. M., Butcher, S. J., and Poston, W. S. C. (2018). High-intensity functional training (HIFT): Definition and research implications for improved fitness. Sports; 6(3):76.
• Frost, D. M., Beach, T. A., Callaghan, J. P., And McGill, S. M. (2012). Using the Functional Movement Screen™ to evaluate the effectiveness of training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research;26(6),1620-1630.
• Gulgin, H., Hoogenboom, B. (2014). The functional movement screening (FMS)™: an inter-rater reliability study between raters of varied experience. Int J Sports Phys Ther; 9:14–20.
• Kiesel, K.B., Plisky, P.J., Voight, M.L. (2007). Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen. N Am J Sports Phys Ther;2(3):147-158.
• Letafatkar, A., Hadadnezhad, M., Shojaedin, S., Mohamadi, E. (2014). Relationship between functional movement screening score and history of injury. Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2014;9(1):21-27.
• Needham, R.A., Chockalingam, N. (2015). The effect of an intervention program on functional movement screen test scores in mixed martial arts athletes. J Strength Cond Res;29:219–25.
• Rodriguez, M.A., Garcia-Calleja, P., Terrados, N., Crespo, I., Del Valle, M., Olmedillas, H. (2021). Injury in CrossFit(R): a systematic review of epidemiology and risk factors. Phys Sportsmed; 1-8.
• Sarıçam, H., Madan, M., And Soykan, A. (2022). The structure and culture of Crossfit as a fitness trend in Turkey.Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences ;24(1):16-22.
• Shim, S. S., Confino, J. E., Vance, D. D. (2023). Common orthopaedic injuries in crossfit athletes. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons;31 (11):557-564.
• Stracciolini, A., Quinn, B., Zwicker, R. L., Howell, D. R., and Sugimoto, D. (2020). Part I: CrossFit-related injury characteristics presenting to sports medicine clinic. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine; 30(2):102-107.
• Summitt, R.J., Cotton, R.A., Kays, A.C., Slaven, E.J. (2016). Shoulder injuries in individuals who participate in crossfit training. Sports Health; 8(6):541-546.
• Szajkowski, S., Dwornik, M., Pasek, J., And Cieślar, G. (2023). Risk Factors for Injury in CrossFit®-A Retrospective Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;20(3), 2211
• Toledo, R., Dias, M.R., Souza, D., et al. (2021). Joint and muscle injuries in men and women CrossFit(R) training participants. Phys Sportsmed; 50:1–7.
• Weisenthal, B.M., Beck, C.A., Maloney, M.D., DeHaven, K.E., Giordano, B.D. (2014). Injury rate and patterns among crossfit athletes. Orthop J Sports Med; 2(4):2325967114531177.